Limitations for Change Detection in Multiple Gabor Targets

We investigate the limitations on the ability to detect when a target has changed, using Gabor targets as simple quantifiable stimuli. Using a partial report technique to equalize response variables, we show that the log of the Weber fraction for detecting a spatial frequency change is proportional to the log of the number of targets, with a set-size effect that is greater than that reported for visual search. This is not a simple perceptual limitation, because pre-cueing a single target out of four restores performance to the level found when only one target is present. It is argued that the primary limitation on performance is the division of attention across multiple targets, rather than decay within visual memory. However in a simplified change detection experiment without cueing, where only one target of the set changed, not only was the set-size effect still larger, but it was greater at 2000 msec ISI than at 250 msec ISI, indicating a possible memory component. The steepness of the set-size effects obtained suggests that even moderate complexity of a stimulus in terms of number of component objects can overload attentional processes, suggesting a possible low-level mechanism for change blindness.

[1]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  D. Regan Storage of spatial-frequency information and spatial-frequency discrimination , 1985 .

[3]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Limited-capacity mechanisms of visual discrimination , 1998, Vision Research.

[4]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[5]  Kenneth C. Scott-Brown,et al.  Comparison Blindness , 2000 .

[6]  Martin Lages,et al.  Spatial frequency discrimination: Visual long-term memory or criterion setting? , 1998, Vision Research.

[7]  R. Blake,et al.  Memory for visual motion. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  H. Orbach,et al.  Contrast discrimination, non–uniform patterns and change blindness , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  J P Thomas,et al.  Parallel processing in visual short-term memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  L. Kasner,et al.  The paradoxical effect of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) in endotoxin-induced uveitis. , 1993, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  J. Palmer Set-size effects in visual search: The effect of attention is independent of the stimulus for simple tasks , 1994, Vision Research.

[12]  G. Brelstaff,et al.  Is the Richness of Our Visual World an Illusion? Transsaccadic Memory for Complex Scenes , 1995, Perception.

[13]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[14]  D. Simons In Sight, Out of Mind: When Object Representations Fail , 1996 .

[15]  Billy Lee,et al.  Contrast Transfer Characteristics of Visual Short-term Memory , 1996, Vision Research.

[16]  M. Hayhoe,et al.  Integration of Form across Saccadic Eye Movements , 1991, Perception.

[17]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE: The Need for Attention to Perceive Changes in Scenes , 1997 .

[18]  A. Noest,et al.  Nonspatial Visual Attention Explained by Spatial Attention Plus Limited Storage , 1996, Perception.

[19]  J. Palmer Attention in Visual Search: Distinguishing Four Causes of a Set-Size Effect , 1995 .

[20]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[21]  D. E. Irwin Memory for position and identity across eye movements. , 1992 .

[22]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Mud splashes render picture changes invisible , 1996 .

[23]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[24]  Svem Magnussen,et al.  High-Fidelity Perceptual Long-Term Memory , 1994 .

[25]  M. Wright,et al.  The Discrimination of Dynamic Orientation Changes in Gratings , 1995, Perception.

[26]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Stimulus-specific mechanisms of visual short-term memory , 1991, Vision Research.

[27]  M. Greenlee,et al.  Perfect visual short-term memory for periodic patterns , 1990 .