Spatial control of membrane receptor function using ligand nanocalipers

The spatial organization of membrane-bound ligands is thought to regulate receptor-mediated signaling. However, direct regulation of receptor function by nanoscale distribution of ligands has not yet been demonstrated, to our knowledge. We developed rationally designed DNA origami nanostructures modified with ligands at well-defined positions. Using these 'nanocalipers' to present ephrin ligands, we showed that the nanoscale spacing of ephrin-A5 directs the levels of EphA2 receptor activation in human breast cancer cells. Furthermore, we found that the nanoscale distribution of ephrin-A5 regulates the invasive properties of breast cancer cells. Our ligand nanocaliper approach has the potential to provide insight into the roles of ligand nanoscale spatial distribution in membrane receptor–mediated signaling.

[1]  K. Senti,et al.  Ephrin-A2 reverse signaling negatively regulates neural progenitor proliferation and neurogenesis. , 2005, Genes & development.

[2]  Samara L. Reck-Peterson,et al.  Tug-of-War in Motor Protein Ensembles Revealed with a Programmable DNA Origami Scaffold , 2012, Science.

[3]  A. Lane,et al.  Eph receptors discriminate specific ligand oligomers to determine alternative signaling complexes, attachment, and assembly responses. , 1998, Genes & development.

[4]  J. Dennis,et al.  Plasma membrane domain organization regulates EGFR signaling in tumor cells , 2007, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  A. Turberfield,et al.  DNA-templated protein arrays for single-molecule imaging. , 2011, Nano letters.

[6]  S. Langermann,et al.  Differential EphA2 epitope display on normal versus malignant cells. , 2003, Cancer research.

[7]  Mark Bathe,et al.  A primer to scaffolded DNA origami , 2011, Nature Methods.

[8]  Elena B. Pasquale,et al.  Eph receptors and ephrins in cancer: bidirectional signalling and beyond , 2010, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[9]  M. Greenberg,et al.  Regulation of EphA4 Kinase Activity Is Required for a Subset of Axon Guidance Decisions Suggesting a Key Role for Receptor Clustering in Eph Function , 2005, Neuron.

[10]  Geoff P. O’Donoghue,et al.  Supported Membranes Embedded with Fixed Arrays of Gold Nanoparticles , 2011, Nano letters.

[11]  T. Pawson,et al.  EphB receptor activity suppresses colorectal cancer progression , 2005, Nature.

[12]  L. Johnston,et al.  Nanoscale Imaging of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Clustering , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  E. Jones,et al.  An extracellular steric seeding mechanism for Eph-ephrin signaling platform assembly , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[14]  P. W. Janes,et al.  Recruitment of Eph receptors into signaling clusters does not require ephrin contact , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  P. W. Janes,et al.  Architecture of Eph receptor clusters , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Andrea I. McClatchey,et al.  Spatial regulation of receptor tyrosine kinases in development and cancer , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  S. Goff,et al.  Dissociation of EphB2 Signaling Pathways Mediating Progenitor Cell Proliferation and Tumor Suppression , 2009, Cell.

[18]  P. Rothemund.  Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Hao Yan,et al.  Programmable DNA self-assemblies for nanoscale organization of ligands and proteins. , 2005, Nano letters.

[20]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes , 2009, Nature.

[21]  DNA-scaffolded nanoparticle structures , 2007 .

[22]  N. Seeman.  Nanomaterials based on DNA. , 2010, Annual review of biochemistry.

[23]  R. Neve,et al.  A conditional feedback loop regulates Ras activity through EphA2. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[24]  A. Acker-Palmer,et al.  Spatial organization of transmembrane receptor signalling , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Jennifer L. Cutter,et al.  EphA2 mediates ligand-dependent inhibition and ligand-independent promotion of cell migration and invasion via a reciprocal regulatory loop with Akt. , 2009, Cancer cell.

[26]  Hao Yan,et al.  Self-assembled DNA nanostructures for distance-dependent multivalent ligand-protein binding. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[27]  S. Fujimoto,et al.  Ephexin4 and EphA2 mediate cell migration through a RhoG-dependent mechanism , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[28]  Wael Mamdouh,et al.  Single-molecule chemical reactions on DNA origami. , 2010, Nature nanotechnology.

[29]  U. Landegren,et al.  Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation , 2006, Nature Methods.

[30]  Shawn M. Douglas,et al.  A Logic-Gated Nanorobot for Targeted Transport of Molecular Payloads , 2012, Science.

[31]  Joe W. Gray,et al.  Restriction of Receptor Movement Alters Cellular Response: Physical Force Sensing by EphA2 , 2010, Science.

[32]  Jin Chen,et al.  Regulation of EphA2 Receptor Endocytosis by SHIP2 Lipid Phosphatase via Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-dependent Rac1 Activation* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[33]  J. Kjems,et al.  Self-assembly of a nanoscale DNA box with a controllable lid , 2009, Nature.

[34]  T Pawson,et al.  Ligands for EPH-related receptor tyrosine kinases that require membrane attachment or clustering for activity. , 1994, Science.

[35]  Kenneth S Campbell,et al.  GelBandFitter – A computer program for analysis of closely spaced electrophoretic and immunoblotted bands , 2009, Electrophoresis.

[36]  R. Adams,et al.  Eph/ephrin molecules--a hub for signaling and endocytosis. , 2010, Genes & development.

[37]  W. Debinski,et al.  Soluble monomeric EphrinA1 is released from tumor cells and is a functional ligand for the EphA2 receptor , 2008, Oncogene.