Optimization of the Cross-Sectional Geometry of Auxetic Dowels for Furniture Joints

In this study, the aim was to optimize the cross-sectional geometry of auxetic dowels for furniture joints. For this purpose, two different sizes of auxetic dowels were chosen, one for frame- and the other for panel-type furniture joints for designing the cross-sectional geometry. Auxetic patterns that are created on the cross-sectional area cause deficiency of the materials, and this phenomenon decreases the modulus of elasticity (MOE) and increases the member stress. Accordingly, maximum MOE values and minimum Poisson’s ratio levels were determined for the optimum strength-auxetic behavior relation by means of a Monte Carlo method. Furthermore, Poisson’s ratio of the optimized dowel’s cross-section was confirmed with experimental tests, numerical analyses and analytical calculations. As a result, Poisson’s ratio values were obtained as negative values and confirmed, which means the dowels designed in this study had auxetic behavior. In conclusion, it could be said that studies should be conducted on the performance of auxetic dowels in both frame and panel furniture joints.

[1]  M. R. Bahubalendruni,et al.  Auxetic Mechanical Metamaterials and their Futuristic Developments: A state-of-art Review , 2022, Materials Today Communications.

[2]  Ali Kasal,et al.  Weight-strength optimization of wooden household chairs based on member section size , 2022, Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología.

[3]  J. Smardzewski,et al.  Analysis of the Internal Mounting Forces and Strength of Newly Designed Fastener to Joints Wood and Wood-Based Panels , 2021, Materials.

[4]  Lin-Bo Mei,et al.  Structural Optimization in Civil Engineering: A Literature Review , 2021, Buildings.

[5]  J. Smardzewski,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of mounting force of auxetic dowels for furniture joints , 2021, Engineering Structures.

[6]  J. Smardzewski,et al.  Experimental and Numerical Study on Withdrawal Strength of Different Types of Auxetic Dowels for Furniture Joints , 2020, Materials.

[7]  Jack Chin Pang Cheng,et al.  Reinforced concrete structural design optimization: A critical review , 2020 .

[8]  Hyun-Cheol Song,et al.  Cellular Auxetic Structures for Mechanical Metamaterials: A Review , 2020, Sensors.

[9]  Guangyue Xu,et al.  China’s energy consumption in construction and building sectors: An outlook to 2100 , 2020 .

[10]  Suprabeet Datta,et al.  A review on optimization techniques used in civil engineering material and structure design , 2020 .

[11]  J. Smardzewski.  Wooden sandwich panels with prismatic core – Energy absorbing capabilities , 2019 .

[12]  J. Smardzewski.  Experimental and numerical analysis of wooden sandwich panels with an auxetic core and oval cells , 2019 .

[13]  Jerzy Smardzewski,et al.  Strength and stiffness of new designed externally invisible and demountable joints for furniture cases , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[14]  Jarkko Niiranen,et al.  Structural optimization employing isogeometric tools in Particle Swarm Optimizer , 2019, Journal of Building Engineering.

[15]  J. Smardzewski,et al.  Response of wood-based sandwich beams with three-dimensional lattice core , 2019, Composite Structures.

[16]  Jerzy Smardzewski,et al.  Numerical modelling of new demountable fasteners for frame furniture , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[17]  Na Liu,et al.  OPTIMAL DESIGN OF A FURNITURE FRAME BY REDUCING THE VOLUME OF WOOD , 2019 .

[18]  J. Smardzewski,et al.  Auxetic Lattice Truss Cores Fabricated of LayWood , 2018, BioResources.

[19]  Girish Krishnan,et al.  Qualitative Analysis and Conceptual Design of Planar Metamaterials with Negative Poisson's Ratio , 2018 .

[20]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Auxetic metamaterials and structures: a review , 2018 .

[21]  Yi Min Xie,et al.  Auxetic nail: Design and experimental study , 2018 .

[22]  Rémi Bardenet,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 2013, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[23]  Huiyuan Guan,et al.  OPTIMAL DESIGN OF STRETCHERS POSITIONS OF MORTISE AND TENON JOINT CHAIR , 2018 .

[24]  G. Allaire,et al.  Geometric constraints for shape and topology optimization in architectural design , 2017 .

[25]  Hyo Seon Park,et al.  Design technology based on resizing method for reduction of costs and carbon dioxide emissions of high-rise buildings , 2017 .

[26]  J. Smardzewski,et al.  Mathematical models and experimental data for HDF based sandwich panels with dual corrugated lightweight core , 2017 .

[27]  Yachi Zhang,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF L-SHAPED CORNER DOWEL JOINT IN PINE USING FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS WITH TAGUCHI METHOD , 2016 .

[28]  Jerzy Smardzewski,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Externally Invisible Furniture Joints Made of Wood-Based Composites , 2015 .

[29]  Umar Ansari,et al.  Review of Mechanics and Applications of Auxetic Structures , 2014 .

[30]  M. Brun,et al.  Auxetic two-dimensional lattices with Poisson's ratio arbitrarily close to −1 , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  Colin Gagg,et al.  Cement and concrete as an engineering material: an historic appraisal and case study analysis , 2014 .

[32]  Antonio J. Nebro,et al.  A survey of multi-objective metaheuristics applied to structural optimization , 2014 .

[33]  Yaochu Jin,et al.  Evolutionary truss layout optimization using the vectorized structure approach , 2013, 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[34]  J. Smardzewski.  Auxetic springs for seating , 2013 .

[35]  G. Johnes,et al.  Performance trends in the construction industry worldwide: an overview of the turn of the century , 2013 .

[36]  J. Smardzewski.  Elastic properties of cellular wood panels with hexagonal and auxetic cores , 2012 .

[37]  F. Scarpa,et al.  The transverse elastic properties of chiral honeycombs , 2010 .

[38]  Andrew Alderson,et al.  The in-plane linear elastic constants and out-of-plane bending of 3-coordinated ligament and cylinder-ligament honeycombs , 2010 .

[39]  Jerzy Smardzewski,et al.  OPTIMISATION OF A SOFA FRAME IN THE INTEGRATED CAD-CAE ENVIRONMENT , 2008 .

[40]  Serdar Ulubeyli,et al.  PHYSICAL FACTORS AFFECTING PRODUCTIVITY OF TURKISH CONSTRUCTION WORKERS , 2006 .

[41]  Donald Garlotta,et al.  A Literature Review of Poly(Lactic Acid) , 2001 .

[42]  J Smardzewski,et al.  FEM algorithm for chair optimisation , 2001 .

[43]  Scott Ferson,et al.  What Monte Carlo methods cannot do , 1996 .

[44]  K. Evans.  Auxetic polymers: a new range of materials , 1991 .

[45]  Julian L. Simon,et al.  Resampling: A Tool for Everyday Statistical Work , 1991 .

[46]  K. Wojciechowski,et al.  Constant thermodynamic tension Monte Carlo studies of elastic properties of a two-dimensional system of hard cyclic hexamers , 1987 .

[47]  R. Lakes.  Foam Structures with a Negative Poisson's Ratio , 1987, Science.

[48]  Alexander G. Kolpakov,et al.  Determination of the average characteristics of elastic frameworks , 1985 .

[49]  P. Diaconis,et al.  Computer-Intensive Methods in Statistics , 1983 .