New developments in low-bit rate videotelephony for people who are deaf.
暂无分享,去创建一个
G Sandini | G. Sandini | W W Woelders | H W Frowein | J Nielsen | P Questa | W. W. Woelders | H. Frowein | J. Nielsen | P. Questa
[1] A. M. Mimpen,et al. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. , 1979, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[2] F J IJsseldijk,et al. Speechreading performance under different conditions of video image, repetition, and speech rate. , 1992, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.
[3] The Effectiveness of Unimodal Versus Bimodal Presentations of Material to be Learned by Hearing-Impaired Students , 1981, American annals of the deaf.
[4] Dolf Schinkel,et al. Improved Speech Recognition Through Videotelephony: Experiments with the Hard of Hearing , 1991, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..
[5] Guido F. Smoorenburg,et al. Viseme classifications of Dutch consonants and vowels , 1994 .
[6] C M Reed,et al. A study of the tactual and visual reception of fingerspelling. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[7] George Sperling,et al. Video Transmission of American Sign Language and Finger Spelling: Present and Projected Bandwidth Requirements , 1981, IEEE Trans. Commun..
[8] The effect of vowel consonant ratio and sentence length on lipreading ability. , 1976, American annals of the deaf.
[9] F. Ferrari,et al. Space variant sensing , 1995 .
[10] Giulio Sandini,et al. Space variant imaging , 1995 .