Conceptual and perceptual memory: retrieval orientations reflected in event-related potentials.

In memory retrieval, search can be guided by mental sets towards different subsets of the available evidence. Such retrieval orientations have been suggested to leave an imprint on event-related potentials (ERPs). The present study aimed at characterizing orientations towards perceptual and conceptual evidence in a recognition task, where pictures and words were studied. In the recognition test, items were presented in either the same format as at study or in the opposite format. A between-subjects manipulation modified the task, instructing an Exclusion group to endorse only items that preserved their format from study, and an Inclusion group to endorse both formats of a studied item. It was hypothesized that exclusion instructions would instill a perceptual and inclusion instructions a conceptual orientation. As a corollary, instructions were expected to dissociate the high end from the low end of the picture-word mirror effect. This expectation was confirmed in a behavioural experiment. In an ERP experiment, retrieval orientations were examined in their effects on correct rejections of new pictures and words. Confirming earlier findings [Hornberger, M., Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: effects of study-test similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1196-1210], a perceptual orientation was accompanied by more positive-going amplitudes over widespread areas. The difference was larger for pictures than for words, supporting behavioural evidence that new pictures are more easily rejected on perceptual grounds than are new words. The Exclusion group showed no ERP evidence of cross-format old-new effects, despite reaction times indicative of involuntary conceptual recognition. The results indicate that perceptual and conceptual retrieval orientations imprint distinct signatures on ERPs. They further suggest that the examined old-new effects in ERPs are mainly linked to voluntary aspects of memory, even in a task where involuntary memory exerts effects on reaction times.

[1]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[2]  Edward L. Wilding,et al.  An Electrophysiological Investigation of Factors Facilitating Strategic Recollection , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Yonelinas.  The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[4]  T. Penney,et al.  Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: the effects of differential encoding. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  T. Curran,et al.  Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  Malcolm W. Brown,et al.  Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Simon Dennis,et al.  ERP ‘old/new’ effects: memory strength and decisional factor(s) , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  F. Craik,et al.  The Oxford handbook of memory , 2006 .

[9]  G. Mandler.  Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[10]  C Van Petten,et al.  Word repetition in amnesia. Electrophysiological measures of impaired and spared memory. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  T. Curran.  Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  David A. Caulton,et al.  Scaling the Episodic Familiarities of Pictures and Words , 1995 .

[13]  F. Rösler,et al.  Exploring memory functions by means of brain electrical topography: A review , 2005, Brain Topography.

[14]  H. Roediger,et al.  Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Astrid M. Schloerscheidt,et al.  The impact of change in stimulus format on the electrophysiological indices of recognition , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cross-Modal Repetition Effects on the N4 , 1991 .

[17]  Jane E Herron,et al.  Strategic influences on recollection in the exclusion task: Electrophysiological evidence , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Event-related brain potentials. , 1990 .

[19]  Claire S. Birch,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence for the Modulation of Retrieval Orientation by Depth of Study Processing , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  A. Wagman.  Event-related Brain Potentials in Man , 1981 .

[21]  Ava J. Senkfor,et al.  Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval Orientation and the Control of Recollection , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  M. Rugg,et al.  Human recognition memory: a cognitive neuroscience perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Mariam Adawiah Dzulkifli,et al.  Electrophysiological indices of strategic episodic retrieval processing , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  C Ranganath,et al.  Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[26]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potential studies of memory , 2000 .

[28]  L. Reder,et al.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  D Friedman,et al.  Old/new differences in direct and indirect memory tests using pictures and words in within- and cross-form conditions: event-related potential and behavioral measures. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  J D Gabrieli,et al.  On the relationship between recognition familiarity and perceptual fluency: evidence for distinct mnemonic processes. , 1998, Acta psychologica.

[31]  B. Luka,et al.  Frontal brain activity predicts individual performance in an associative memory exclusion test. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  M. Glanzer,et al.  Encoding, repetition, and the mirror effect in recognition memory: Symmetry in motion , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[33]  M. Rugg,et al.  An event-related potential study of explicit memory on tests of cued recall and recognition , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Brain Potentials during Memory Retrieval Provide Neurophysiological Support for the Distinction between Conscious Recollection and Priming , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[35]  K. Paller.  Electrical Signals of Memory and of the Awareness of Remembering , 2004 .

[36]  W. Hockley,et al.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  D. Schacter,et al.  Memory systems of 1999 , 2000 .

[38]  Ken A Paller,et al.  The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: when a face seems familiar but is not remembered , 2004, NeuroImage.

[39]  M. W. Brown,et al.  Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  T. Curran.  Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[41]  Cyma Van Petten,et al.  Memory conjunction errors in younger and older adults: Event-related potential and neuropsychological data , 1999 .

[42]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Neural Correlates of Retrieval Orientation: Effects of StudyTest Similarity , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Rugg,et al.  Retrieval processing and episodic memory , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[46]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  The picture superiority effect: support for the distinctiveness model. , 1999, The American journal of psychology.

[47]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Interfacing mind and brain: a neurocognitive model of recognition memory. , 2000, Psychophysiology.

[48]  E. E. Johns,et al.  The effect of feature frequency on short-term recognition memory , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Leif R. Hedman,et al.  The picture superiority effect in a cross-modality recognition task , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[50]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  An electrophysiological study of cross-modal repetition priming. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[51]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Lynne M Reder,et al.  Word frequency and receiver operating characteristic curves in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process interpretation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[53]  Tim Curran,et al.  Differentiating amodal familiarity from modality-specific memory processes: an ERP study. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[54]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[55]  Michael D Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval orientation and retrieval effort , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[56]  L. Jacoby.  A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory , 1991 .

[57]  H. Roediger,et al.  Perceptual and Conceptual Processes in Implicit and Explicit Tests with Picture Fragment and Word Fragment Cues , 1995 .

[58]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.