Applications of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI in Oncology Drug Development

Approximately one third of the American and European population will develop cancer at some time in their lives. The incidence of cancer increases with age, and among middle-aged people cancer is the single greatest cause of mortality. Currently the major treatment options are surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal modulation. Despite the tremendous improvements in cancer treatment over the past few decades, survival rates for many cancers are still poor and cytotoxic chemotherapy is usually accompanied by signifi cant toxicity. There remains a huge unmet medical need for better cancer therapies. Entirely novel anti-cancer drugs are under development. With the explosion in our understanding of the molecular biology of cancer, hundreds of potential molecular targets have been identifi ed for anticancer drugs beyond the traditional antiproliferative agents. Potential drug targets have been identifi ed in receptors, enzymes and associated biochemical pathways, in areas such as angiogenesis and tumour perfusion, the cell cycle, apoptosis, invasion and growth factors. Targets identifi ed in angiogenesis and the tumour vasculature (Cristofanilli et al. 2002) include the signalling pathways responsible for the growth of new blood vessels, together with factors required for the survival and structural integrity of immature endothelium. Vascular targets are particularly attractive, since effects on a small number of endothelial cells may affect the nutrition of a large number of tumour cells and, because the cancer cell itself is not targeted, the problem of resistance may be reduced. Medicinal chemists and molecular biologists have been highly successful at devising candidate drugs with good activity in preclinical testing against targets in the tumour vasculature. Dozens of such molecules are now in clinical trial, and hundreds more are in pre-clinical evaluation. These candidate drugs include orally bioavailable, rationally designed, small organic molecules, as well as biological agents that would typically require parenteral administration, for example neutralising antibodies. The clinical development of these newer types of agent poses new challenges. Unlike antiproliferative drugs, they will not inevitably show acute dose-limiting toxicity. In addition the anti-angiogenic compounds are likely to be cytostatic rather than cytotoxic, and thus tumour stabilisation rather than response is a more probable outcome, at least with monotherapy. Considerable ingenuity may be required to devise a development programme that effectively identifi es the best candidate drug molecule CONTENTS

[1]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  L. Blumenson,et al.  Angiogenesis and dynamic MR imaging gadolinium enhancement of malignant and benign breast lesions , 1997, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  M. van Glabbeke,et al.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors , 2000, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  N. Rege,et al.  ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline: guideline for good clinical practice. , 2001, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[5]  L. Lesko,et al.  Use of biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development and regulatory decision making: criteria, validation, strategies. , 2001, Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology.

[6]  M V Knopp,et al.  Angiogenic activity of cervical carcinoma: assessment by functional magnetic resonance imaging-based parameters and a histomorphological approach in correlation with disease outcome. , 1998, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[7]  G Brix,et al.  Tumor microcirculation evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging predicts therapy outcome for primary rectal carcinoma. , 2001, Cancer research.

[8]  G. Peters,et al.  Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and SU5416 in patients with solid tumors. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[9]  M. Miyazaki,et al.  Dynamic-enhanced MRI predicts metastatic potential of invasive ductal breast cancer , 2002, Breast cancer.

[10]  J. Debatin,et al.  MR angiography with a new rapid‐clearance blood pool agent: Initial experience in rabbits , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  J. Waterton,et al.  Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to evaluate acute treatment with ZD6474, a VEGF signalling inhibitor, in PC-3 prostate tumours , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[12]  J. Lewin,et al.  A phase I pharmacokinetic and translational study of the novel vascular targeting agent combretastatin a-4 phosphate on a single-dose intravenous schedule in patients with advanced cancer. , 2002, Cancer research.

[13]  L. Ellis,et al.  Development of biologic markers of response and assessment of antiangiogenic activity in a clinical trial of human recombinant endostatin. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  G Brix,et al.  Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. , 1998, Cancer research.

[15]  P J Drew,et al.  Microvessel density in invasive breast cancer assessed by dynamic gd‐dtpa enhanced MRI , 1997 .

[16]  D B Kopans,et al.  Dynamic echo-planar imaging of the breast: experience in diagnosing breast carcinoma and correlation with tumor angiogenesis. , 1997, Radiology.

[17]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Angiogenesis modulation in cancer research: novel clinical approaches , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[18]  F Frouin,et al.  Reduced capillary perfusion and permeability in human tumour xenografts treated with the VEGF signalling inhibitor ZD4190: an in vivo assessment using dynamic MR imaging and macromolecular contrast media. , 2003, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[19]  G Brix,et al.  Angiogenesis of uterine cervical carcinoma: characterization by pharmacokinetic magnetic resonance parameters and histological microvessel density with correlation to lymphatic involvement. , 1997, Cancer research.

[20]  J P Logue,et al.  Tumour oxygenation levels correlate with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters in carcinoma of the cervix. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  R. Matsubayashi,et al.  Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. , 2000, Radiology.

[22]  Donald W Kufe,et al.  Phase I clinical trial of recombinant human endostatin administered as a short intravenous infusion repeated daily. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  N. Thacker,et al.  Breath‐hold perfusion and permeability mapping of hepatic malignancies using magnetic resonance imaging and a first‐pass leakage profile model , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[24]  H Baddeley,et al.  Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance scanning as a predictor of response to accelerated radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[25]  M. Knopp,et al.  Cervical carcinoma: standard and pharmacokinetic analysis of time-intensity curves for assessment of tumor angiogenesis and patient survival. , 1999 .

[26]  A. Jackson,et al.  Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in newly presenting glioma. , 2003, The British journal of radiology.

[27]  Jamal Zweit,et al.  Molecular imaging and biological evaluation of HuMV833 anti-VEGF antibody: implications for trial design of antiangiogenic antibodies. , 2002, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[28]  P. Doevendans,et al.  Visualisation of cell death in vivo in patients with acute myocardial infarction , 2000, The Lancet.

[29]  L D Buadu,et al.  Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. , 1996, Radiology.

[30]  R. Blasberg,et al.  Imaging brain tumor proliferative activity with [124I]iododeoxyuridine. , 2000, Cancer research.

[31]  L. Ellis,et al.  Phase I study of recombinant human endostatin in patients with advanced solid tumors. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  O Salonen,et al.  MRI enhancement and microvascular density in gliomas. Correlation with tumor cell proliferation. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[34]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[35]  J. Witjes,et al.  Evaluation of chemotherapy in advanced urinary bladder cancer with fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[36]  A. Padhani,et al.  Effects of 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid on human tumor microcirculation assessed by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  M. Kitajima,et al.  Characterization of Breast Masses by Dynamic Enhanced MR Imaging , 1999, Acta radiologica.

[38]  S. Williams,et al.  Assessment of anti-angiogenic and anti-vascular therapeutics using Magnetic Resonance Imaging: recommendations for appropriate methodology for clinical trials. , 2003 .

[39]  J R Griffiths,et al.  Tumour dose response to the antivascular agent ZD6126 assessed by magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  R. Murakami,et al.  Role of dynamic MRI in the evaluation of head and neck cancers treated with radiation therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.