Guidance on the Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) ofgenetically modified plants

The European Commission asked the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA GMO Panel) to update its 2006 scientific opinion on Post-Market Environmental Monitoring (PMEM) of Genetically Modified Plants (GMPs). For doing so, the EFSA GMO Panel made use of the experience gained from its assessment of applications on GMPs for cultivation and considered different sources of information such as the PMEM reports on cultivated GMPs, relevant scientific literature and stakeholders comments. This scientific opinion aims to clarify the objectives, tasks, tools and requirements for PMEM. Firsly, the present document explains the scientific rationale for PMEM, including the concept of developing management and monitoring strategies based on the overall conclusions and assumptions of the Environmental Risk Assessment. Secondly, it provides examples and guidance to applicants on how to develop and implement their plans for Case-Specific Monitoring (CSM), taking into account the case-by-case character of CSM. In addition, it provides guidance to applicants on the strategy, methodology and reporting of General Surveillance (GS). Different tools and approaches to implement a plan for GS are considered. The EFSA GMO Panel proposes a holistic and integrative approach for monitoring GMPs in the EU that considers GS within a framework of general environmental protection monitoring. Finally, the EFSA GMO Panel makes proposals to risk managers for the future conduct of PMEM in the EU and suggests that access to PMEM data could be facilitated by setting-up standardised and centralised reporting centres. This scientific opinion repeals the former 2006 scientific opinion of the EFSA GMO Panel on PMEM of GMPs.

[1]  F. Graef Agro-environmental effects due to altered cultivation practices with genetically modified herbicide-tolerant oilseed rape and implications for monitoring. A review , 2011, Agronomy for Sustainable Development.

[2]  Marie-Josée Simard,et al.  A Framework for Postrelease Environmental Monitoring of Second-generation Crops with Novel Traits , 2010 .

[3]  A. Hilbeck,et al.  Identifying indicator species for post-release monitoring of genetically modified, herbicide resistant crops , 2008, Euphytica.

[4]  D. Bartsch,et al.  National coordination of GMO monitoring – a concept for Germany , 2006, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[5]  A. Gathmann National implementation plan for MON810 monitoring in Germany – A way forward to improve General Surveillance? , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[6]  Joachim Schiemann,et al.  Concept for the Realisation of a GMO Monitoring in Germany , 2003 .

[7]  Hwan-Mook Kim,et al.  Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified soybean and maize in cultivated fields and along the transportation routes of the Incheon Port in South Korea , 2009 .

[8]  J. Babcock,et al.  Three-Year Field Monitoring of Cry1F, Event DAS-Ø15Ø7-1, Maize Hybrids for Nontarget Arthropod Effects , 2009, Environmental entomology.

[9]  J. Schiemann,et al.  Farm questionnaires for monitoring genetically modified crops: a case study using GM maize. , 2008, Environmental biosafety research.

[10]  F. Graef,et al.  Determining indicators, methods and sites for monitoring potential adverse effects of genetically modified plants to the environment: the legal and conceptional framework for implementation , 2008, Euphytica.

[11]  F. Herzog,et al.  Case-specific monitoring of butterflies to determine potential effects of transgenic Bt-maize in Switzerland , 2009 .

[12]  D. Bartsch,et al.  Implication of the Environmental Liability Directive for General Surveillance – What to Protect? , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[13]  D. Andow,et al.  Evaluating Resistance to Bt Toxin Cry1Ab by F2 Screen in European Populations of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) , 2010, Journal of economic entomology.

[14]  Huilin Li,et al.  Evidence of field-evolved resistance to Cry1Ac-expressing Bt cotton in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in northern China. , 2009, Pest management science.

[15]  M. Liebman,et al.  Weed Management in Agroecosystems Ecological Approaches , 1988 .

[16]  F. Bigler,et al.  An approach for post‐market monitoring of potential environmental effects of Bt‐maize expressing Cry1Ab on natural enemies , 2009 .

[17]  J. Perry Statistical aspects of field experiments , 1997 .

[18]  Nobuyoshi Nakajima,et al.  Monitoring the occurrence of genetically modified oilseed rape growing along a Japanese roadside: 3-year observations. , 2009, Environmental biosafety research.

[19]  W. Schröder,et al.  Monitoring of Bt-Maize pollen exposure in the vicinity of the nature reserve Ruhlsdorfer Bruch in northeast Germany 2007 to 2008 , 2010 .

[20]  M. Delos,et al.  Biological surveillance programme for the monitoring of crop pests and indicators, French devices and European approach compared , 2007, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[21]  J. Memmott,et al.  Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole‐farm approach , 2007 .

[22]  J. Schiemann,et al.  Monitoring the commercial cultivation of Bt maize in Europe--conclusions and recommendations for future monitoring practice. , 2009, Environmental biosafety research.

[23]  Richard Verhoeven,et al.  Information system for monitoring environmental impacts of genetically modified organisms , 2010, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[24]  J. Schiemann,et al.  A mathematical model of exposure of non-target Lepidoptera to Bt-maize pollen expressing Cry1Ab within Europe , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[25]  L. Lotz,et al.  Inventory of observed unexpected environmental effects of genetically modified crops , 2010 .

[26]  Winfried Schröder,et al.  Cultivation of GMO in Germany: support of monitoring and coexistence issues by WebGIS technology , 2011 .

[27]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Bt Cotton and Maize on Nontarget Invertebrates , 2007, Science.

[28]  F. Graef,et al.  GMO monitoring data coordination and harmonisation at EU level – Outcomes of the European Commission Working Group on Guidance Notes supplementing Annex VII of Directive 2001/18/EC , 2009, Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit.

[29]  Proposed Definition of Environmental Damage Illustrated by the Cases of Genetically Modified Crops and Invasive Species , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[30]  F. Bigler,et al.  A conceptual framework for the design of environmental post-market monitoring of genetically modified plants. , 2005, Environmental biosafety research.

[31]  Norbert Sauberer,et al.  Setup, efforts and practical experiences of a monitoring program for genetically modified plants - an Austrian case study for oilseed rape and maize , 2011 .

[32]  Masaharu Kawata,et al.  Dispersal and persistence of genetically modified oilseed rape around Japanese harbors , 2009, Environmental science and pollution research international.

[33]  Usda-Ars,et al.  MONITORING OF RESISTANCE DEVELOPMENT TO BT COTTON IN FIELD POPULATIONS OF HELICOVERPA ARMIGERA (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) , 2009 .