Meningiomas with conventional MRI findings resembling intraaxial tumors: can perfusion-weighted MRI be helpful in differentiation?

IntroductionTo investigate the contribution of perfusion-weighted MRI to the differentiation of meningiomas with atypical conventional MRI findings from intraaxial tumors.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 54 meningiomas, 12 glioblastomas and 13 solitary metastases. We detected 6 meningiomas with atypical features on conventional MRI resembling intraaxial tumors. The regional cerebral blood flow (rCBV) ratios of all tumors were calculated via perfusion-weighted MRI. The signal intensity-time curves were plotted and three different curve patterns were observed. The type 1 curve resembled normal brain parenchyma or the postenhancement part was minimally below the baseline, the type 2 curve was similar to the type 1 curve but with the postenhancement part above the baseline, and the type 3 curve had the postenhancement part below the baseline accompanied by widening of the curve. Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis.ResultsOn CBV images meningiomas were hypervascular and the mean rCBV ratio was 10.58±2.00. For glioblastomas and metastatic lesions, the rCBV ratios were 5.02±1.40 and 4.68±1.54, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in rCBV ratios between meningiomas and glioblastomas and metastases (P<0.001). Only one of the meningiomas displayed a type 2 curve while five showed a type 3 curve. Glioblastomas and metastases displayed either a type 1 or a type 2 curve. None of the meningiomas showed a type 1 curve and none of the glioblastomas or metastases showed a type 3 curve.ConclusionDifferentiating meningiomas with atypical conventional MRI findings from malignant intraaxial tumors can be difficult. Calculation of rCBV ratios and construction of signal intensity-time curves may contribute to the differentiation of meningiomas from intraaxial tumors.

[1]  J. Petrella,et al.  MR perfusion imaging of the brain: techniques and applications. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  A. Guermazi,et al.  The dural tail sign--beyond meningioma. , 2005, Clinical radiology.

[3]  A L Benabid,et al.  Cerebral blood volume mapping by MR imaging in the initial evaluation of brain tumors. , 2002, Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie.

[4]  A. Mahmood,et al.  Atypical and malignant meningiomas: a clinicopathological review. , 1993 .

[5]  B. Scheithauer,et al.  Meningioma grading: an analysis of histologic parameters. , 1997, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[6]  M. Hartmann,et al.  Characterization of necrotic meningioma using diffusion MRI, perfusion MRI, and MR spectroscopy: case report and review of the literature , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[7]  M. Samii,et al.  Cystic meningiomas resembling glial tumors. , 1997, Surgical neurology.

[8]  Rising signal intensity observed in extra-axial brain tumours - a potential pitfall in perfusion MR imaging. , 2003, Singapore medical journal.

[9]  H. Budka,et al.  Classic, atypical, and anaplastic meningioma: three histopathological subtypes of clinical relevance. , 1992, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  M. Apuzzo,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of cystic meningiomas and its surgical implications. , 1995, Neurosurgery.

[11]  G Johnson,et al.  Glial neoplasms: dynamic contrast-enhanced T2*-weighted MR imaging. , 1999, Radiology.

[12]  A. Kalnin,et al.  Correlation between the degree of contrast enhancement and the volume of peritumoral edema in meningiomas and malignant gliomas , 1999, Neuroradiology.

[13]  A. Benabid,et al.  Contribution of dynamic contrast MR imaging to the differentiation between dural metastasis and meningioma , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[14]  M. Muti,et al.  Perfusion MRI in the evaluation of the relationship between tumour growth, necrosis and angiogenesis in glioblastomas and grade 1 meningiomas , 2003, Neuroradiology.

[15]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements of endothelial permeability: differentiation between atypical and typical meningiomas. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[16]  W. K. Alfred Yung.  PATHOLOGY AND GENETICS OF TUMOURS OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM , 2002 .

[17]  E. Markakis,et al.  Atypical and malignant meningiomas: evaluation of different radiological criteria based on CT and MRI. , 1996, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[18]  A. Mahmood,et al.  Atypical and Malignant Meningiomas , 1993 .

[19]  M Takahashi,et al.  Correlation of MR imaging-determined cerebral blood volume maps with histologic and angiographic determination of vascularity of gliomas. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  I. Ercan,et al.  High-grade and low-grade gliomas: differentiation by using perfusion MR imaging. , 2005, Clinical radiology.

[21]  A P Pathak,et al.  Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient‐echo and spin‐echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  O Speck,et al.  Perfusion MRI of the human brain with dynamic susceptibility contrast: Gradient‐echo versus spin‐echo techniques , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  J. Smirniotopoulos,et al.  Typical, atypical, and misleading features in meningioma. , 1991, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  Glyn Johnson,et al.  Intracranial mass lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced susceptibility-weighted echo-planar perfusion MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.