Characterizing the information content of a newly hatched chick's first visual object representation.

How does object recognition emerge in the newborn brain? To address this question, I examined the information content of the first visual object representation built by newly hatched chicks (Gallus gallus). In their first week of life, chicks were raised in controlled-rearing chambers that contained a single virtual object rotating around a single axis. In their second week of life, I tested whether subjects had encoded information about the identity and viewpoint of the virtual object. The results showed that chicks built object representations that contained both object identity information and view-specific information. However, there was a trade-off between these two types of information: subjects who were more sensitive to identity information were less sensitive to view-specific information, and vice versa. This pattern of results is predicted by iterative, hierarchically organized visual processing machinery, the machinery that supports object recognition in adult primates. More generally, this study shows that invariant object recognition is a core cognitive ability that can be operational at the onset of visual object experience.

[1]  James J DiCarlo,et al.  A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Justin N. Wood Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Giorgio Vallortigara,et al.  Core knowledge of object, number, and geometry: A comparative and neural approach , 2012, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[4]  Tomaso Poggio,et al.  Trade-Off between Object Selectivity and Tolerance in Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Retinotopy of the face aftereffect , 2008, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Trade-off between curvature tuning and position invariance in visual area V4 , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  How position dependent is visual object recognition? , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[8]  James J. DiCarlo,et al.  How Does the Brain Solve Visual Object Recognition? , 2012, Neuron.

[9]  Harvey J Karten,et al.  Neocortical Evolution: Neuronal Circuits Arise Independently of Lamination , 2013, Current Biology.

[10]  N. Logothetis,et al.  View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.

[11]  Davide Zoccolan,et al.  Multifeatural Shape Processing in Rats Engaged in Invariant Visual Object Recognition , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Gabriel Horn,et al.  Pathways of the past: the imprint of memory , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[13]  A. Ishai,et al.  Recollection- and Familiarity-Based Decisions Reflect Memory Strength , 2008, Frontiers in systems neuroscience.

[14]  A. Gelman Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models (comment on article by Browne and Draper) , 2004 .

[15]  J. Piaget The construction of reality in the child , 1954 .

[16]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[17]  J. Kruschke Doing Bayesian Data Analysis: A Tutorial with R and BUGS , 2010 .

[18]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  High-level visual object representations are constrained by position. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.