Correlation Between Immediate In-Brace Correction and Biomechanical Effectiveness of Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Study Design. Multiple brace designs were simulated using a finite element model and their biomechanical effect was evaluated. Objective. To study correlations between immediate in-brace correction of coronal curves and bending moments acting on the apical vertebrae. Summary of Background Data. Immediate in-brace correction has often been deemed as fundamental to long-term brace effect but the biomechanical explanation is unclear. Methods. Three-dimensional geometry of 3 patients was acquired using multiview radiographs and surface topography techniques. A finite element model of the patients' trunk including gravitational forces and a parametric brace model were created. Two sets of mechanical properties of the spine (stiff and flexible) were tested. Installation of the brace on the patients was simulated. Using an experimental design framework including fourteen design factors, 1024 different virtual braces were tested for each patient. For each brace, immediate in-brace correction of the coronal Cobb angles and the bending moment acting on the apical vertebrae were computed and their correlation was studied. Results. Immediate correction of coronal curves and corresponding impact on the apical vertebrae bending moments were linearly correlated (mean R2 = 0.88). The amount of immediate correction necessary to nullify the bending moment ranged between 19% and 61% with average 48% (flexible spine model) and 27% (stiff spine model). The braces corrected the apical vertebrae bending moment more in the flexible spine model. In the framework of the Hueter-Volkmann principle, the correlation between coronal immediate in-brace correction and corresponding apical bending moment can be interpreted as a correlation between immediate in-brace correction and long-term treatment outcome. The amount of immediate correction necessary to invert the bending moments, and in theory counteract the progression of the scoliotic deformity, depends on spine stiffness and spine segment. Conclusion. This study confirms the importance of immediate in-brace correction to predict long-term outcome of the treatment and provides insights in the understanding of brace biomechanics.

[1]  A. Nachemson.  Disc Pressure Measurements , 1981, Spine.

[2]  A. Kaelin,et al.  The Boston Bracing System for Idiopathic Scoliosis: Follow-up Results in 295 Patients , 1986, Spine.

[3]  S G Zachariah,et al.  Material properties of commonly-used interface materials and their static coefficients of friction with skin and socks. , 1998, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[4]  Ian A. F. Stokes,et al.  Analysis and simulation of progressive adolescent scoliosis by biomechanical growth modulation , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[5]  A B Schultz,et al.  Optimization of skeletal configuration: studies of scoliosis correction biomechanics. , 1991, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Use of the Milwaukee Brace for Progressive Idiopathic Scoliosis* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Scoliotic Spine and Pelvis From Uncalibrated Biplanar x-Ray Images , 2007, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[8]  C. L. Chen,et al.  Segment inertial properties of Chinese adults determined from magnetic resonance imaging. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[9]  H. Frost,et al.  Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 3. The hyaline cartilage modeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[10]  H. Labelle,et al.  Patient-specific mechanical properties of a flexible multi-body model of the scoliotic spine , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[11]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Accuracy assessment of human trunk surface 3D reconstructions from an optical digitising system , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[12]  M. Machida.  Cause of idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[13]  I. Stokes,et al.  Endochondral growth in growth plates of three species at two anatomical locations modulated by mechanical compression and tension , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[14]  A. Schultz,et al.  Trunk Muscle Activities in Braced Scoliosis Patients , 1989, Spine.

[15]  I. Stokes,et al.  Alterations in the growth plate associated with growth modulation by sustained compression or distraction. , 2007, Bone.

[16]  D. Katz,et al.  Factors That Influence Outcome in Bracing Large Curves in Patients With Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2001, Spine.

[17]  J. Stuart Hunter,et al.  The 2 k—p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I , 2000, Technometrics.

[18]  H Labelle,et al.  A new X-ray calibration/reconstruction system for 3D clinical assessment of spinal deformities. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[19]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Optimization method for 3D bracing correction of scoliosis using a finite element model , 2000, European Spine Journal.

[20]  J. Leong,et al.  New Prognostic Factors to Predict the Final Outcome of Brace Treatment in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1995, Spine.

[21]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Electromyography of scoliotic patients treated with a brace , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  R Vanderby,et al.  A biomechanical analog of curve progression and orthotic stabilization in idiopathic scoliosis. , 1986, Journal of biomechanics.

[23]  C. Wimmer,et al.  Estimating the final outcome of brace treatment for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis at 6-month follow-up , 2003, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[24]  Y K Liu,et al.  Inertial properties of a segmented cadaver trunk: their implications in acceleration injuries. , 1971, Aerospace medicine.

[25]  Delphine Périé,et al.  Personalized biomechanical simulations of orthotic treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[26]  D. Pearsall,et al.  Inertial properties of the human trunk of males determined from magnetic resonance imaging , 1994, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  D. Gardner-Bonneau,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Non-Operative Treatments for Idiopathic Scoliosis*† , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  F. Castro,et al.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, bracing, and the Hueter-Volkmann principle. , 2003, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  J. S. Hunter,et al.  The 2 k—p Fractional Factorial Designs Part I , 2000, Technometrics.

[30]  F Lavaste,et al.  [Geometrical modeling of the spine and the thorax for the biomechanical analysis of scoliotic deformities using the finite element method]. , 1995, Annales de chirurgie.

[31]  Yvan Petit,et al.  Assessment of the 3-D reconstruction and high-resolution geometrical modeling of the human skeletal trunk from 2-D radiographic images , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[32]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions , 2007, European Spine Journal.

[33]  D. Pearsall,et al.  Segmental inertial parameters of the human trunk as determined from computed tomography , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[34]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  A 3D visualization tool for the design and customization of spinal braces , 2007, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[35]  H. Frost.  Skeletal structural adaptations to mechanical usage (SATMU): 2. Redefining Wolff's Law: The remodeling problem , 1990, The Anatomical record.

[36]  Farida Cheriet,et al.  A versatile 3D reconstruction system of the spine and pelvis for clinical assessment of spinal deformities , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[37]  S. Weinstein,et al.  Use of the Rosenberger Brace in the Treatment of Progressive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis , 2004, Spine.

[38]  M. Lacroix,et al.  Biomechanical modelling of orthotic treatment of the scoliotic spine including a detailed representation of the brace-torso interface , 2004, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[39]  Hubert Labelle,et al.  Virtual prototyping of a brace design for the correction of scoliotic deformities , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[40]  J. Dansereau,et al.  Biomechanical simulations of the spine deformation process in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis from different pathogenesis hypotheses , 2004, European Spine Journal.

[41]  Yvan Petit,et al.  Boston Brace Correction in Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Biomechanical Study , 2003, Spine.

[42]  A. Mak,et al.  In vivo friction properties of human skin , 1999, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[43]  H Labelle,et al.  [A study of biomechanical coupling between spine and rib cage in the treatment by orthosis of scoliosis]. , 1996, Annales de chirurgie.