Rationale and study design of the CardioGene Study: genomics of in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS in-stent restenosis is a major limitation of stent therapy for atherosclerosis coronary artery disease. The CardioGene Study is an ongoing study of restenosis in bare mental stents (BMS) for the treatment of coronary artery disease. The overall goal is to understand the genetic determinants of the responses to vascular injury that result in the development of restenosis in some patients but not in others. Gene expression profiling at transcriptional and translational levels provides global assessment of gene activity after vascular injury and mechanistic insight. Furthermore, the delineation of genetic biomarkers would be of value in the clinical setting of risk-stratify patients prior to stent therapy. Prospective risk stratification would allow for the rational selection of specialized treatments against the development of in-stent restenosis (ISR), such as drug-eluting stents. SETTING Patients are enrolled at two sites in the US with high-volume cardiac catheterization facilities: the William Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak, MI, USA, and the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN, USA. STUDY DESIGN Two complementary study designs are used to understand the molecular mechanisms of restenosis and the genetic biomarkers predictive of restenosis. First, 350 patients are enrolled prospectively at the time of stent implantation. Blood is sampled prior to stent placement and afterwards at 2 weeks and 6 months. The clinical outcome of restenosis is determined 6 and 12 months after stent placement. The primary outcome is clinical restenosis at 6 months. The major secondary outcome is clinical restenosis at 12 months. Second, a corollary case-control analysis will be carried out with the enrollment of an additional 250 cases with a history of recurrent restenosis after treatment with BMS. Controls for this analysis are derived from the prospective cohort. PATIENTS AND METHODS Consecutive patients presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory are screened, informed about the study and enrolled after signing the consent form. Enrollment has been completed for the prospective cohort, and enrollment of the additional group is ongoing. A standardized questionnaire is used to collect clinical data primarily through direct patient interview to assess medical history, medication use, functional status, family history, environmental factors, and social history. Further data are abstracted from the medical charts and catheterization reports. A total of 276 clinical variables are collected per individual at baseline, and 49 variables are collected at each of the 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. A Clinical Events Committee adjudicates clinical outcomes. Blood samples are processed at each clinical enrollment site using standardized operating procedures. From each blood sample, several aliquots are prepared and stored of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, granulocytes, platelets, serum, and plasma. Additionally, a portion of each patient's leukocytes is cryopreserved for future cell-line creation. Samples are frozen and shipped to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Additional materials generated in the analysis of the samples at the NHLBI are frozen and stored, including isolated genomic DNA, total RNA, reverse transcribed cDNA libraries and labeled RNA hybridization mixtures used in microarray analysis. Per individual in the prospective cohort, high-quality transcript profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells at each time of blood sampling are obtained using Affymetrix U133A microarrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Per chip, this yields 495,930 features per individual per time of sampling. This represents expression levels for 22,283 genes per patients oer time of blood sampling, including 14,500 well-characterized human genes. Proteomics of plasma is performed with multidimensional liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. Protein expression is examined similarly to mRNA expression as a measure of gene expression. Genotyping is performed in two manners. First, those genes showing differential expression at the levels of mRNA and protein are investigated using a candidate gene approach. Specific variants in known gene regulatory regions, such as promoters, are sought initially, as those variants may explain differences in expression level. Second, a genome-wide scan is used to identify genetic loci that are associated with ISR. Those regions identified are further examined for genes that show differential expression in the mRNA microarray profiling or proteomics investigations. These genes are finely investigated for candidate SNPs and other gene variants. Complementary genomic and proteomic approaches are expected to be robust. Integration of data sets is accomplished using a variety of informatics tools, organization of gene expression into functional pathways, and investigation of physical maps of up- and downregulated sets of genes. CONCLUSIONS The CardioGene Study is designed to understand ISR. Global gene and protein expression profiling define molecular phenotypes of patients. Well-defined clinical phenotypes will be paired with genomic data to define analyses aimed to achieve several goals. These include determining blood gene and protein expression in patients with ISR, investigating the genetic basis of ISR, developing predictive gene and protein biomarkers, and the identification of new targets for treatment.

[1]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Coronary-artery stents. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  E. Nabel,et al.  Bone marrow-derived immune cells regulate vascular disease through a p27(Kip1)-dependent mechanism. , 2004, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[3]  M. Hellmich,et al.  Comparison of different isolation techniques prior gene expression profiling of blood derived cells: impact on physiological responses, on overall expression and the role of different cell types , 2004, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[4]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Prediction of survival in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma based on the expression of six genes. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Patrick W Serruys,et al.  Clinical, Angiographic, and Procedural Predictors of Angiographic Restenosis After Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in Complex Patients: An Evaluation From the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) Study , 2004, Circulation.

[6]  Hyun-Jai Cho,et al.  Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[7]  L. Pease,et al.  Having it both ways: MHC recognition in cis and trans , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[8]  P. Serruys,et al.  Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Restenosis After Stent Deployment in Diabetic Patients , 2004, Circulation.

[9]  D. Cohen,et al.  Can we afford to eliminate restenosis? Can we afford not to? , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  G. Stone,et al.  A polymer-based, paclitaxel-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2004, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  F. Cipollone,et al.  Preprocedural Level of Soluble CD40L Is Predictive of Enhanced Inflammatory Response and Restenosis After Coronary Angioplasty , 2003, Circulation.

[12]  Marjan S. Bolouri,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Protein Composition, Tissue Diversity, and Gene Regulation in Mouse Mitochondria , 2003, Cell.

[13]  Jeffrey W Moses,et al.  Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  Peter Libby Bone marrow: a fountain of vascular youth? , 2003, Circulation.

[15]  M. West,et al.  Gene expression predictors of breast cancer outcomes , 2003, The Lancet.

[16]  Ciro Indolfi,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of in-stent restenosis and approach to therapy with eluting stents. , 2003, Trends in cardiovascular medicine.

[17]  Rossella Fattori,et al.  Drug-eluting stents in vascular intervention , 2003, The Lancet.

[18]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Identification of a gene causing human cytochrome c oxidase deficiency by integrative genomics , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  D. Baim,et al.  Clinical restenosis after coronary stenting: perspectives from multicenter clinical trials. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  Joseph L. Gastwirth,et al.  Trend Tests for Case-Control Studies of Genetic Markers: Power, Sample Size and Robustness , 2002, Human Heredity.

[21]  K. Sugimachi,et al.  Essential Role of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1 in Development of Restenotic Changes (Neointimal Hyperplasia and Constrictive Remodeling) After Balloon Angioplasty in Hypercholesterolemic Rabbits , 2002, Circulation.

[22]  E. Edelman,et al.  Systemic Inflammation Induced by Lipopolysaccharide Increases Neointimal Formation After Balloon and Stent Injury in Rabbits , 2002, Circulation.

[23]  P. Kemmeren,et al.  Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[24]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Hematopoietic stem cells differentiate into vascular cells that participate in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis , 2002, Nature Medicine.

[25]  F. Welt,et al.  Targeting CCR2 or CD18 Inhibits Experimental In-Stent Restenosis in Primates: Inhibitory Potential Depends on Type of Injury and Leukocytes Targeted , 2002, Circulation research.

[26]  H. Bergmeister,et al.  Artery Balloon Angioplasty Model B Significantly Contributes to Lumen Loss in a Rabbit Iliac κ Activation of Nuclear Factor , 2002 .

[27]  G. Condorelli,et al.  Efficacy and age-related effects of nitric oxide-releasing aspirin on experimental restenosis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Levon M Khachigian,et al.  Coronary In-stent Restenosis: Current Status and Future Strategies , 2022 .

[29]  M. Vidal,et al.  Combined Functional Genomic Maps of the C. elegans DNA Damage Response , 2002, Science.

[30]  J. Ott,et al.  Multi-locus interactions predict risk for post-PTCA restenosis: an approach to the genetic analysis of common complex disease , 2002, The Pharmacogenomics Journal.

[31]  S. Dudoit,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING DIFFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED GENES IN REPLICATED cDNA MICROARRAY EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[32]  J. Ott,et al.  Trimming, weighting, and grouping SNPs in human case-control association studies. , 2001, Genome research.

[33]  G. Church,et al.  Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[34]  D. Simon,et al.  Leukocyte Integrin Mac-1 Recruits Toll/Interleukin-1 Receptor Superfamily Signaling Intermediates to Modulate NF-&kgr;B Activity , 2001, Circulation research.

[35]  D. Schaid,et al.  Case-Control Studies of Genetic Markers: Power and Sample Size Approximations for Armitage’s Test for Trend , 2001, Human Heredity.

[36]  C. Morillo,et al.  Clinical and quantitative coronary angiographic predictors of coronary restenosis: a comparative analysis from the balloon-to-stent era. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[37]  R. Schwartz,et al.  p27-p16 Fusion Gene Inhibits Angioplasty-Induced Neointimal Hyperplasia and Coronary Artery Occlusion , 2001, Circulation research.

[38]  S. Marx,et al.  Role for p27(Kip1) in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Migration. , 2001, Circulation.

[39]  P. Libby,et al.  Host bone-marrow cells are a source of donor intimal smooth- muscle–like cells in murine aortic transplant arteriopathy , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[40]  F. Neumann,et al.  Transcriptome Analysis Reveals a Role of Interferon-γ in Human Neointima Formation , 2001 .

[41]  F Unger,et al.  Comparison of coronary-artery bypass surgery and stenting for the treatment of multivessel disease. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[42]  M. Makuuchi,et al.  Circulating smooth muscle progenitor cells contribute to atherosclerosis , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[43]  J. Rossi,et al.  Ribozyme-Mediated Inhibition of Rat Leukocyte-Type 12-Lipoxygenase Prevents Intimal Hyperplasia in Balloon-Injured Rat Carotid Arteries , 2001, Circulation.

[44]  M. Reale,et al.  Elevated circulating levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in patients with restenosis after coronary angioplasty. , 2001, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[45]  J. Tanguay,et al.  Recombinant Soluble P-Selectin Glycoprotein Ligand-1-Ig Reduces Restenosis Through Inhibition of Platelet-Neutrophil Adhesion After Double Angioplasty in Swine , 2001, Circulation.

[46]  M. Daly,et al.  A map of human genome sequence variation containing 1.42 million single nucleotide polymorphisms , 2001, Nature.

[47]  M. Vidal A Biological Atlas of Functional Maps , 2001, Cell.

[48]  L. Jakt,et al.  Assessing clusters and motifs from gene expression data. , 2001, Genome research.

[49]  G. Mintz,et al.  Coronary in-stent restenosis - predictors, treatment and prevention. , 2000, European heart journal.

[50]  M. Isobe,et al.  Roles of P-Selectin in Inflammation, Neointimal Formation, and Vascular Remodeling in Balloon-Injured Rat Carotid Arteries , 2000, Circulation.

[51]  J. Ott,et al.  Selecting SNPs in two‐stage analysis of disease association data: a model‐free approach , 2000, Annals of human genetics.

[52]  A. Diez-Juan,et al.  Control of vascular smooth muscle cell growth by cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitory proteins and its implication in cardiovascular disease. , 2000, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[53]  S. Kimmel,et al.  A simplified lesion classification for predicting success and complications of coronary angioplasty. Registry Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Intervention. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[54]  E. Nabel,et al.  Nitric oxide modulates expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins: a cytostatic strategy for inhibition of human vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation. , 2000, Circulation.

[55]  R. Rothenberg,et al.  Ischemic heart disease , 2000 .

[56]  M. Ziol,et al.  Interleukin-10 inhibits intimal hyperplasia after angioplasty or stent implantation in hypercholesterolemic rabbits. , 2000, Circulation.

[57]  Ash A. Alizadeh,et al.  Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling , 2000, Nature.

[58]  E. Edelman,et al.  Decreased neointimal formation in Mac-1(-/-) mice reveals a role for inflammation in vascular repair after angioplasty. , 2000, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[59]  D. Holmes,et al.  Coronary artery stents. , 2000, JAMA.

[60]  J. Hopfield,et al.  From molecular to modular cell biology , 1999, Nature.

[61]  G. Stone,et al.  Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. , 1999, Circulation.

[62]  P. D. de Feyter,et al.  Periprocedural quantitative coronary angiography after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation predicts the restenosis rate at six months: results of a meta-analysis of the BElgian NEtherlands Stent study (BENESTENT) I, BENESTENT II Pilot, BENESTENT II and MUSIC trials. Multicenter Ultrasound Stent In Coro , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[63]  V. Koteliansky,et al.  Soluble transforming growth factor-beta type II receptor inhibits negative remodeling, fibroblast transdifferentiation, and intimal lesion formation but not endothelial growth. , 1999, Circulation research.

[64]  S Marx,et al.  Inhibition of intimal thickening after balloon angioplasty in porcine coronary arteries by targeting regulators of the cell cycle. , 1999, Circulation.

[65]  M. Yokoyama,et al.  Tranilast inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell growth and intimal hyperplasia by induction of p21(waf1/cip1/sdi1) and p53. , 1999, Circulation research.

[66]  R. Virmani,et al.  Pathology of acute and chronic coronary stenting in humans. , 1999, Circulation.

[67]  E. Topol,et al.  Frontiers in interventional cardiology. , 1998, Circulation.

[68]  E. Nabel,et al.  Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in vascular disease. , 1998, Circulation research.

[69]  V. Lindner,et al.  Remodeling and neointimal formation in the carotid artery of normal and P-selectin-deficient mice. , 1997, Circulation.

[70]  P. Sasieni From genotypes to genes: doubling the sample size. , 1997, Biometrics.

[71]  E. Braunwald,et al.  Prospective validation of a composite end point in thrombolytic trials of acute myocardial infarction (TIMI 4 and 5). Thrombosis In Myocardial Infarction. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.

[72]  P. Libby,et al.  Restenosis revisited--new targets, new therapies. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[73]  P. Libby,et al.  The Nuclear Factor κ-B Signaling Pathway Participates in Dysregulation of Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells in Vitroand in Human Atherosclerosis* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[74]  V. Fuster,et al.  Macrophage infiltration predicts restenosis after coronary intervention in patients with unstable angina. , 1996, Circulation.

[75]  N Risch,et al.  The Future of Genetic Studies of Complex Human Diseases , 1996, Science.

[76]  E. Nabel,et al.  Role of the p21 cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in limiting intimal cell proliferation in response to arterial injury. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  P. Serruys,et al.  Contributions of frequency distribution analysis to the understanding of coronary restenosis. A reappraisal of the gaussian curve. , 1996, Circulation.

[78]  W. Weintraub,et al.  Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late outcome after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1995, Circulation.

[79]  P. Libby,et al.  Sustained Activation of Vascular Cells and Leukocytes in the Rabbit Aorta After Balloon Injury , 1993, Circulation.

[80]  S. Coughlin,et al.  Thrombin stimulates proliferation of cultured rat aortic smooth muscle cells by a proteolytically activated receptor. , 1993, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[81]  E J Topol,et al.  Coronary morphologic and clinical determinants of procedural outcome with angioplasty for multivessel coronary disease. Implications for patient selection. Multivessel Angioplasty Prognosis Study Group. , 1990, Circulation.

[82]  M A Hlatky,et al.  A brief self-administered questionnaire to determine functional capacity (the Duke Activity Status Index). , 1989, The American journal of cardiology.

[83]  T. Ryan Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[84]  F. Loop,et al.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Subcommittee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty). , 1988, Circulation.