Native internally calibrated chromatin immunoprecipitation for quantitative studies of histone post-translational modifications

Chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled to next-generation sequencing (ChIP-seq) has served as the central method for the study of histone modifications for the past decade. In ChIP-seq analyses, antibodies selectively capture nucleosomes bearing a modification of interest and the associated DNA is then mapped to the genome to determine the distribution of the mark. This approach has several important drawbacks: (i) ChIP interpretation necessitates the assumption of perfect antibody specificity, despite growing evidence that this is often not the case. (ii) Common methods for evaluating antibody specificity in other formats have little or no bearing on specificity within a ChIP experiment. (iii) Uncalibrated ChIP is reported as relative enrichment, which is biologically meaningless outside the experimental reference frame defined by a discrete immunoprecipitation (IP), thus preventing facile comparison across experimental conditions or modifications. (iv) Differential library amplification and loading onto next-generation sequencers, as well as computational normalization, can further compromise quantitative relationships that may exist between samples. Consequently, the researcher is presented with a series of potential pitfalls and is blind to nearly all of them. Here we provide a detailed protocol for internally calibrated ChIP (ICeChIP), a method we recently developed to resolve these problems by spike-in of defined nucleosomal standards within a ChIP procedure. This protocol is optimized for specificity and quantitative power, allowing for measurement of antibody specificity and absolute measurement of histone modification density (HMD) at genomic loci on a biologically meaningful scale enabling unambiguous comparisons. We provide guidance on optimal conditions for next-generation sequencing (NGS) and instructions for data analysis. This protocol takes between 17 and 18 h, excluding time for sequencing or bioinformatic analysis. The ICeChIP procedure enables accurate measurement of histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) genome-wide in mammalian cells as well as Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans, indicating suitability for use in eukaryotic cells more broadly. ICeChIP (internally calibrated ChIP) uses spiked-in, defined nucleosomal standards to overcome the pitfalls of traditional ChIP experiments, enabling the measurement of antibody specificity and the absolute measurement of histone modification density at genomic loci.

[1]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[2]  J. I. Izpisúa Belmonte,et al.  Macrohistone variants preserve cell identity by preventing the gain of H3K4me2 during reprogramming to pluripotency. , 2013, Cell reports.

[3]  FOXA1 directs H3K4 monomethylation at enhancers via recruitment of the methyltransferase MLL3 , 2016 .

[4]  Alexander Varshavsky,et al.  Mapping proteinDNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: Evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene , 1988, Cell.

[5]  Michael Q. Zhang,et al.  Epigenomic Analysis of Multilineage Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2013, Cell.

[6]  D. Reich,et al.  Cost-effective, high-throughput DNA sequencing libraries for multiplexed target capture , 2012, Genome research.

[7]  Antoine H. F. M. Peters,et al.  Disruption of histone methylation in developing sperm impairs offspring health transgenerationally , 2015, Science.

[8]  Martin Renqiang Min,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[9]  K. Struhl,et al.  Where Does Mediator Bind In Vivo? , 2009, PloS one.

[10]  A. Jeltsch,et al.  Detailed specificity analysis of antibodies binding to modified histone tails with peptide arrays , 2011, Epigenetics.

[11]  Shohei Koide,et al.  Broad ranges of affinity and specificity of anti-histone antibodies revealed by a quantitative peptide immunoprecipitation assay. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  J. Widom,et al.  New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.

[14]  Matthew J. Meiners,et al.  Examining the Roles of H3K4 Methylation States with Systematically Characterized Antibodies. , 2018, Molecular cell.

[15]  T. Kouzarides.  Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[16]  Peter J. Park,et al.  An assessment of histone-modification antibody quality , 2010, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[17]  Marcus Lewis,et al.  Reducing amplification artifacts in high multiplex amplicon sequencing by using molecular barcodes , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[18]  Christina N. Vallianatos,et al.  Disrupted intricacy of histone H3K4 methylation in neurodevelopmental disorders. , 2015, Epigenomics.

[19]  F. Dilworth,et al.  Analysis of epigenetic modifications of chromatin at specific gene loci by native chromatin immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes isolated using hydroxyapatite chromatography , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[20]  Paul Tempst,et al.  Recognition of trimethylated histone H3 lysine 4 facilitates the recruitment of transcription postinitiation factors and pre-mRNA splicing. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[21]  Deqing Hu,et al.  A role for H3K4 monomethylation in gene repression and partitioning of chromatin readers. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[22]  C. Allis,et al.  Methylation of lysine 4 on histone H3: intricacy of writing and reading a single epigenetic mark. , 2007, Molecular cell.

[23]  J. Wysocka,et al.  Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? , 2013, Molecular cell.

[24]  Hiroshi Kimura,et al.  Epigenetic engineering shows H3K4me2 is required for HJURP targeting and CENP-A assembly on a synthetic human kinetochore , 2010, The EMBO journal.

[25]  Andrew N. Holding,et al.  Parallel factor ChIP provides essential internal control for quantitative differential ChIP-seq , 2018, Nucleic acids research.

[26]  M. Lieber,et al.  Histone methylation and V(D)J recombination , 2014, International Journal of Hematology.

[27]  R. Evans,et al.  Regulation of Hormone-Induced Histone Hyperacetylation and Gene Activation via Acetylation of an Acetylase , 1999, Cell.

[28]  T. Richmond,et al.  Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 Å resolution , 1997, Nature.

[29]  Ryan A. Flynn,et al.  A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans , 2011, Nature.

[30]  Gergana Bounova,et al.  Quantifying ChIP-seq data: a spiking method providing an internal reference for sample-to-sample normalization , 2014 .

[31]  R. Young,et al.  A Chromatin Landmark and Transcription Initiation at Most Promoters in Human Cells , 2007, Cell.

[32]  M. Baker.  Reproducibility crisis: Blame it on the antibodies , 2015, Nature.

[33]  Data production leads,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[34]  Steven Henikoff,et al.  High-resolution mapping of transcription factor binding sites on native chromatin , 2013, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[35]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Transcriptional and Epigenetic Dynamics during Specification of Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2013, Cell.

[36]  F. Lan,et al.  Human LSD2/KDM1b/AOF1 regulates gene transcription by modulating intragenic H3K4me2 methylation. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[37]  Jie Zhang,et al.  Redistribution of H3K4me2 on neural tissue specific genes during mouse brain development , 2012, BMC Genomics.

[38]  Adrian T. Grzybowski,et al.  An Interactive Database for the Assessment of Histone Antibody Specificity. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[39]  M. Baker.  1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility , 2016, Nature.

[40]  S. Spicuglia,et al.  H3K4 tri‐methylation provides an epigenetic signature of active enhancers , 2011, The EMBO journal.

[41]  J. Lis,et al.  Detecting protein-DNA interactions in vivo: distribution of RNA polymerase on specific bacterial genes. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  Stuart L. Schreiber,et al.  Active genes are tri-methylated at K4 of histone H3 , 2002, Nature.

[43]  Xiaoman Li,et al.  H3K4me2 reliably defines transcription factor binding regions in different cells. , 2014, Genomics.

[44]  Steven L Salzberg,et al.  Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2 , 2012, Nature Methods.

[45]  Peter A. DiMaggio,et al.  A quantitative atlas of histone modification signatures from human cancer cells , 2013, Epigenetics & Chromatin.

[46]  R. Harris,et al.  Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope, and Wastes Billions , 2017 .

[47]  J. Davie,et al.  Histone H3K4 trimethylation: dynamic interplay with pre-mRNA splicing. , 2016, Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire.

[48]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Quantitative ChIP-Seq normalization reveals global modulation of the epigenome. , 2014, Cell reports.

[49]  Adrian T. Grzybowski,et al.  Calibrating ChIP-Seq with Nucleosomal Internal Standards to Measure Histone Modification Density Genome Wide. , 2015, Molecular cell.

[50]  M. Solomon,et al.  Formaldehyde-mediated DNA-protein crosslinking: a probe for in vivo chromatin structures. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[51]  D. Reinberg,et al.  Histone H3 Lys 4 methylation: caught in a bind? , 2006, Genes & development.

[52]  M. Eisen,et al.  Impact of Chromatin Structures on DNA Processing for Genomic Analyses , 2009, PloS one.

[53]  B. Garcia,et al.  Histone H3K36 mutations promote sarcomagenesis through altered histone methylation landscape , 2016, Science.

[54]  Erica Y. Shen,et al.  Regulation of histone H3K4 methylation in brain development and disease , 2014, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Warren Strober,et al.  Trypan Blue Exclusion Test of Cell Viability , 2001, Current protocols in immunology.

[56]  C. Allis,et al.  The language of covalent histone modifications , 2000, Nature.

[57]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[58]  T. Mikkelsen,et al.  Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells , 2007, Nature.

[59]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[60]  V. Londhe,et al.  Chromatin dynamics: H3K4 methylation and H3 variant replacement during development and in cancer , 2014, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[61]  Feng Zhao,et al.  An Alternative Approach to ChIP-Seq Normalization Enables Detection of Genome-Wide Changes in Histone H3 Lysine 27 Trimethylation upon EZH2 Inhibition , 2016, PloS one.

[62]  A. Shilatifard,et al.  Molecular regulation of histone H3 trimethylation by COMPASS and the regulation of gene expression. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[63]  Aaron R. Quinlan,et al.  Bioinformatics Applications Note Genome Analysis Bedtools: a Flexible Suite of Utilities for Comparing Genomic Features , 2022 .

[64]  Marc D. Perry,et al.  ChIP-seq guidelines and practices of the ENCODE and modENCODE consortia , 2012, Genome research.

[65]  Dustin E. Schones,et al.  High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome , 2007, Cell.

[66]  Richard A Young,et al.  Aberrant chromatin at genes encoding stem cell regulators in human mixed-lineage leukemia. , 2008, Genes & development.

[67]  LSD1-Mediated Demethylation of H3K4me2 Is Required for the Transition from Late Progenitor to Differentiated Mouse Rod Photoreceptor , 2016, Molecular Neurobiology.

[68]  B. Strahl,et al.  Influence of Combinatorial Histone Modifications on Antibody and Effector Protein Recognition , 2011, Current Biology.

[69]  Weiqun Peng,et al.  Enhancer priming by H3K4 methyltransferase MLL4 controls cell fate transition , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.