Public anxiety, trust, and the role of mediators in communicating risk of exposure to low dose radiation after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant explosion
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Christopher E. Clarke,et al. Efficacy Information in Media Coverage of Infectious Disease Risks , 2012 .
[2] S. Friedman,et al. Chernobyl coverage: how the US media treated the nuclear industry , 1992 .
[3] Leon Mann,et al. Nuclear attitudes after chernobyl: a cross-national study , 1990 .
[4] A Comparison of Residents Who Moved Versus Those Who Remained Prior to Restart of Three Mile Island1 , 1989 .
[5] Anne Pedersen,et al. Anger and Guilt About Ingroup Advantage Explain the Willingness for Political Action , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.
[6] Teun Terpstra,et al. Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[7] Lillian Trettin,et al. Is Trust a Realistic Goal of Environmental Risk Communication? , 2000 .
[8] J. L. Durfee. “Social Change” and “Status Quo” Framing Effects on Risk Perception , 2006 .
[9] Iain Walker,et al. Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration , 2001 .
[10] Margôt Kuttschreuter,et al. The Development of Risk Communication , 2004 .
[11] Brian Wynne,et al. Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science , 1992 .
[12] M. Siegrist,et al. Exploring the Triangular Relationship Between Trust, Affect, and Risk Perception: A Review of the Literature , 2008 .
[13] R. Paine. `Chernobyl' reaches Norway: the accident, science, and the threat to cultural knowledge , 1992 .
[14] S. Reeves,et al. Discourse Analysis , 2018, The Study of Language.
[15] Bridging the gap between science and policy: the importance of mutual respect, trust and the role of mediators , 2012 .
[16] N. Allum,et al. Exploring public discourses about emerging technologies through statistical clustering of open-ended survey questions , 2013, Public understanding of science.
[17] A. Wåhlberg,et al. Risk perception and the media , 2000 .
[18] S. Friedman. Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima: An analysis of traditional and new media coverage of nuclear accidents and radiation , 2011 .
[19] P. Slovic. Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.
[20] Åsa Boholm,et al. New perspectives on risk communication: uncertainty in a complex society , 2008 .
[21] S. Prince-Embury,et al. Perception of Control and Faith in Experts Among Residents in the Vicinity of Three Mile Island1 , 1987 .
[22] Dietram A. Scheufele,et al. Risk communication: A mental models approach , 2003 .
[23] Ortwin Renn,et al. Public responses to the Chernobyl accident , 1990 .
[24] Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al. A Comparison of Responses to Internet and Postal Surveys in a Public Engagement Context , 2006 .
[25] H. P. Peters. The credibility of information sources in West Germany after the Chernobyl disaster , 1992 .
[26] Frank von Hippel,et al. The radiological and psychological consequences of the Fukushima Daiichi accident , 2011 .
[27] L. Lemyre,et al. Psychosocial considerations for mass decontamination. , 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[28] T. Postmes,et al. Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: a quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. , 2008, Psychological bulletin.
[29] T. Earle,et al. What was the meaning of chernobyl , 1990 .
[30] Lennart Sjöberg,et al. Risk perception and worries after the chernobyl accident , 1990 .
[31] W. Leiss. Three Phases in the Evolution of Risk Communication Practice , 1996 .
[32] R. P. Wilson,et al. Accident? , 1956, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
[33] B. Fischhoff,et al. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits , 1978 .
[34] C. Waddell. The role of pathos in the decision‐making process: A study in the rhetoric of science policy , 1990 .