PyPAD: a multidisciplinary framework for preliminary airframe design

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe the development of an integrated framework suitable for preliminary airframe design, called PyPAD (Python module for Preliminary Aircraft Design), providing the capability to define models to compute loads and to perform the structural sizing. Design/methodology/approach The modules developed until now allow for the definition of multi-fidelity aero-structural models starting from a Common Parametric Aircraft Configuration Schema (CPACS) input file and to compute static loads (trim) and flutter margin with minimum user effort. PyPAD take advantages of Abaqus-CAE, and the main functions are developed in Python, to take advantages of the simplicity in terms of software development and maintenance, but the core routines are developed in Fortran, taking advantages of parallel programming to get the best performances. Findings A complete test case, starting from the CPACS input and ending with the definition of structural, aerodynamic and aero-elastic models, with the computation of different design loads, is reported. An example will show that the framework developed is able to handle different problematics of the preliminary projects using quite complex global models. Practical implications All the tools developed in the framework, and the ones currently under development, could be a valid help during the preliminary design of a new aircraft, speeding up the iterative process and improving the design solution. Originality/value PyPAD is the first framework developed around Abaqus-CAE for the preliminary aircraft design and is one of the few tools looking at the different problematics involved in a preliminary airframe design: design, loads and aero-elasticity, sizing and multi-disciplinary optimization.

[1]  Gerald Kress,et al.  Mass estimation of transport aircraft wingbox structures with a CAD/CAE-based multidisciplinary process , 2011 .

[2]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Communication in aircraft design : Can we establish a common language? , 2012 .

[3]  Dieter Kohlgrüber,et al.  A FINITE ELEMENT BASED TOOL CHAIN FOR STRUCTURAL SIZING OF TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT IN PRELIMINARY AIRCRAFT DESIGN , 2013 .

[4]  Paolo Ermanni,et al.  Dynamic CAD objects for structural optimization in preliminary aircraft design , 2006 .

[5]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Improvements and Extensions to a Full-Potential Formulation Based on Independent Fields , 2012 .

[6]  Luigi Morino,et al.  Steady and Oscillatory Subsonic and Supersonic Aerodynamics around Complex Configurations , 1975 .

[7]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization , 2015 .

[8]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Improved Matrix Fraction Approximation of Aerodynamic Transfer Matrices , 2013 .

[9]  Paolo Ermanni,et al.  Associative parametric CAE methods in the aircraft pre-design ? ? This article was presented at the , 2005 .

[10]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Common Research Model Wing–Body–Tail Configuration , 2016 .

[11]  Peter Horst,et al.  Multidisciplinary Integrated Preliminary Design Applied to Unconventional Aircraft Configurations , 2008 .

[12]  L. Morino,et al.  Subsonic Potential Aerodynamics for Complex Configurations: A General Theory , 1974 .

[13]  E C Yates,et al.  AGARD Standard Aeroelastic Configurations for Dynamic Response I - Wing 445.6 , 1988 .

[14]  G. La Rocca,et al.  Knowledge based engineering techniques to support aircraft design and optimization , 2011 .

[15]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Implementation of a Tool Chain for Extended Physics-Based Wing Mass Estimation in Early Design Stages , 2012 .

[16]  Luca Cavagna,et al.  NeoCASS: An integrated tool for structural sizing, aeroelastic analysis and MDO at conceptual design level , 2010 .

[17]  Peter Horst,et al.  INFLUENCE OF AEROELASTIC EFFECTS ON PRELIMINARY AIRCRAFT DESIGN , 2000 .

[18]  P. Mantegazza,et al.  Independent Two-Fields Solution for Full-Potential Unsteady Transonic Flows , 2010 .

[19]  Mehdi Tarkian,et al.  Aircraft Parametric 3D Modelling and Panel Code of Analysis for Conceptual Design , 2007 .

[20]  Boris Moulin,et al.  Dynamic Response of Aeroservoelastic Systems to Gust Excitation , 2005 .