Impact of Local Effects on the Evolution of Unconventional Rock Permeability

When gas is extracted from unconventional rock, local equilibrium conditions between matrixes and fractures are destroyed and significant local effects are introduced. Although the interactions between the matrix and fracture have a strong influence on the permeability evolution, they are not understood well. This may be the reason why permeability models in commercial codes do not include the matrix-fracture interactions. In this study, we introduced the local force to define the interactions between the matrix and the fracture and derived a set of partial differential equations to define the full coupling of rock deformation and gas flow both in the matrix and in the fracture systems. The full set of cross-coupling formulations were solved to generate permeability evolution profiles during unconventional gas extraction. The results of this study demonstrate that the contrast between the matrix and fracture properties controls the processes and their evolutions. The primary reason is the gas diffusion from fractures to matrixes. The diffusion changes the force balance, mass exchange and deformation.

[1]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Influence of gas adsorption induced non-uniform deformation on the evolution of coal permeability , 2019, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences.

[2]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Coal permeability maps under the influence of multiple coupled processes , 2018 .

[3]  A. Marshall,et al.  Elastic–Brittle–Plastic Behaviour of Shale Reservoirs and Its Implications on Fracture Permeability Variation: An Analytical Approach , 2018, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.

[4]  R. Bustin,et al.  Geological controls on matrix permeability of Devonian Gas Shales in the Horn River and Liard basins, northeastern British Columbia, Canada , 2012 .

[5]  Yaodong Jiang,et al.  Impact of transition from local swelling to macro swelling on the evolution of coal permeability , 2011 .

[6]  Bernhard M. Krooss,et al.  Transport properties of unconventional gas systems , 2012 .

[7]  Antonin Settari,et al.  A Pore Scale Gas Flow Model for Shale Gas Reservoir , 2012 .

[8]  Y. Gensterblum,et al.  Experimental study of fluid transport processes in the matrix system of the European organic-rich shales: I. Scandinavian Alum Shale , 2014 .

[9]  Zhixue Sun,et al.  Numerical simulation of gas transport mechanisms in tight shale gas reservoirs , 2013, Petroleum Science.

[10]  Dong Chen,et al.  Interactions of multiple processes during CBM extraction: A critical review , 2011 .

[11]  M. Jamiolahmady,et al.  Fluid transport in shale gas reservoirs: Simultaneous effects of stress and slippage on matrix permeability , 2016 .

[12]  A. Cheng,et al.  Fundamentals of Poroelasticity , 1993 .

[13]  Stuart Day,et al.  Causes and consequences of errors in determining sorption capacity of coals for carbon dioxide at high pressure , 2009 .

[14]  Zhihui Ye,et al.  Dependence of gas shale fracture permeability on effective stress and reservoir pressure: Model match and insights , 2015 .

[15]  Yan Peng,et al.  Impact of coal matrix strains on the evolution of permeability , 2017 .

[16]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Permeability evolution in fractured coal: The roles of fracture geometry and water-content , 2011 .

[17]  J. Curtis.  Fractured shale-gas systems , 2002 .

[18]  D. Airey,et al.  Modelling stress and strain in coal seams during CO2 injection incorporating the rock–fluid interactions , 2016 .

[19]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Combined effects of directional compaction, non-Darcy flow and anisotropic swelling on coal seam gas extraction , 2013 .

[20]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: A new FE model , 2008 .

[21]  J. Foroozesh,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Gas Production From Tight, Ultratight and Shale Gas Reservoirs: Flow Regimes and Geomechanical Effects , 2015 .

[22]  Faruk Civan,et al.  Shale-Gas Permeability and Diffusivity Inferred by Improved Formulation of Relevant Retention and Transport Mechanisms , 2011 .

[23]  George Em Karniadakis,et al.  REPORT: A MODEL FOR FLOWS IN CHANNELS, PIPES, AND DUCTS AT MICRO AND NANO SCALES , 1999 .

[24]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Evolution of shale apparent permeability from stress-controlled to displacement-controlled conditions , 2016 .

[25]  R. Bustin,et al.  Importance of rock properties on the producibility of gas shales , 2012 .

[26]  Jishan Liu,et al.  A fully coupled multiscale shale deformation-gas transport model for the evaluation of shale gas extraction , 2016 .

[27]  Jishan Liu,et al.  Combined impact of flow regimes and effective stress on the evolution of shale apparent permeability , 2016 .

[28]  Hassan Hassanzadeh,et al.  Matrix-fracture transfer shape factor for modeling flow of a compressible fluid in dual-porosity media , 2011 .

[29]  Matrix Permeability Measurements of Gas Shales: Gas Slippage and Adsorption as Sources of Systematic Error. , 2011 .

[30]  L. Connell,et al.  A theoretical model for gas adsorption-induced coal swelling , 2007 .

[31]  J. E. Warren,et al.  The Behavior of Naturally Fractured Reservoirs , 1963 .

[32]  Yu-Shu Wu,et al.  A Multiple-Continuum Model for Simulation of Gas Production from Shale Gas Reservoirs , 2013 .

[33]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Comprehensive rock engineering : principles, practice, and projects , 1993 .