Modeling Proficiency with Implicit User Representations

We introduce the problem of proficiency modeling: Given a user’s posts on a social media platform, the task is to identify the subset of posts or topics for which the user has some level of proficiency. This enables the filtering and ranking of social media posts on a given topic as per user proficiency. Unlike experts on a given topic, proficient users may not have received formal training and possess years of practical experience, but may be autodidacts, hobbyists, and people with sustained interest, enabling them to make genuine and original contributions to discourse. While predicting whether a user is an expert on a given topic imposes strong constraints on who is a true positive, proficiency modeling implies a graded scoring, relaxing these constraints. Put another way, many active social media users can be assumed to possess, or eventually acquire, some level of proficiency on topics relevant to their community. We tackle proficiency modeling in an unsupervised manner by utilizing user embeddings to model engagement with a given topic, as indicated by a user’s preference for authoring related content. We investigate five alternative approaches to model proficiency, ranging from basic ones to an advanced, tailored user modeling approach, applied within two real-world benchmarks for evaluation.

[1]  Karen Spärck Jones A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval , 2021, J. Documentation.

[2]  Quoc V. Le,et al.  Distributed Representations of Sentences and Documents , 2014, ICML.

[3]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Latent Dirichlet Allocation , 2001, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[4]  Marcel Worring,et al.  Unsupervised, Efficient and Semantic Expertise Retrieval , 2016, WWW.

[5]  Benno Stein,et al.  Celebrity Profiling , 2019, ACL.

[6]  S. Dreyfus,et al.  A Five-Stage Model of the Mental Activities Involved in Directed Skill Acquisition , 1980 .

[7]  Zhiqiang Zhang,et al.  A Topic-Specific Contextual Expert Finding Method in Social Network , 2016, APWeb.

[8]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The recency effect: Implicit learning with explicit retrieval? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Z. Yue Approach to group decision making based on determining the weights of experts by using projection method , 2012 .

[10]  Yueting Zhuang,et al.  Expert Finding for Community-Based Question Answering via Ranking Metric Network Learning , 2016, IJCAI.

[11]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  The effects of member expertise on group decision-making and performance , 2002 .

[12]  Laurie A. Rudman,et al.  The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. , 2008 .

[13]  Dirk Hovy,et al.  Multitask Learning for Mental Health Conditions with Limited Social Media Data , 2017, EACL.

[14]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Finding similar experts , 2007, SIGIR.

[15]  Jonathan K. Kummerfeld,et al.  Exploring Self-Identified Counseling Expertise in Online Support Forums , 2021, FINDINGS.

[16]  K. Anders Ericsson,et al.  Attaining Excellence Through Deliberate Practice: Insights from the Study of Expert Performance , 2008 .

[17]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Modelling Context with User Embeddings for Sarcasm Detection in Social Media , 2016, CoNLL.

[18]  D. Thomas King,et al.  Mind over Machine. , 1978 .

[19]  Byron C. Wallace,et al.  Quantifying Mental Health from Social Media with Neural User Embeddings , 2017, MLHC.

[20]  Benno Stein,et al.  Overview of the Author Profiling Task at PAN 2013 , 2013, CLEF.

[21]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Expertise Retrieval , 2012, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..

[22]  Mark S. Ackerman,et al.  Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture , 2000, CSCW '00.

[23]  M. de Rijke,et al.  Determining Expert Profiles (With an Application to Expert Finding) , 2007, IJCAI.

[24]  Salim Roukos,et al.  Bleu: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation , 2002, ACL.

[25]  Gerhard Blickle,et al.  Sozialpsychologie , 2001, Z. für Medienpsychologie.