Against structural constraints in subject-verb agreement production.

Syntactic structure has been considered an integral component of agreement computation in language production. In agreement error studies, clause-boundedness (Bock & Cutting, 1992) and hierarchical feature-passing (Franck, Vigliocco, & Nicol, 2002) predict that local nouns within clausal modifiers should produce fewer errors than do those within phrasal modifiers due to structural differences; however, Gillespie and Pearlmutter (2011b) suggested structure might play a more limited role. Two studies examined whether the clause-boundedness effect would occur when prepositional phrase modifiers and relative clause modifiers were matched in properties likely to influence the timing of planning (Gillespie & Pearlmutter, 2011b; Solomon & Pearlmutter, 2004). In both studies, more errors occurred for plural local nouns, but the clause-boundedness effect was not observed. These findings suggest that agreement computation during production does not involve a hierarchical component.

[1]  Neal J. Pearlmutter,et al.  Hierarchy and scope of planning in subject–verb agreement production , 2011, Cognition.

[2]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[3]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[4]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[5]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Psychology of Language , 1974 .

[6]  Freda Kemp Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[7]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Making syntax of sense: number agreement in sentence production. , 2005, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Jescheniak,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production , 1994 .

[9]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Normal and pathological development of subject–verb agreement in speech production: a study on French children , 2004, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[11]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Using Mechanical Turk to Obtain and Analyze English Acceptability Judgments , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[12]  D. Barr Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression , 2008 .

[13]  William Badecker,et al.  Morphology, agreement and working memory retrieval in sentence production : Evidence from gender and case in Slovak , 2007 .

[14]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[15]  P. O'Seaghdha,et al.  Phrasal Ordering Constraints in Sentence Production: Phrase Length and Verb Disposition in Heavy-NP Shift , 1998 .

[16]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Object interference in subject–verb agreement: The role of intermediate traces of movement , 2010 .

[17]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[18]  Mary Dalrymple,et al.  Lexical Functional Grammar , 2001 .

[19]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[20]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[21]  Ulrich H. Frauenfelder,et al.  The interplay of syntax and form in sentence production: A cross-linguistic study of form effects on agreement , 2008 .

[22]  R. Jarvella Syntactic processing of connected speech , 1971 .

[23]  Elisabeth Dévière,et al.  Analyzing linguistic data: a practical introduction to statistics using R , 2009 .

[24]  I. Sag English relative clause constructions , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[25]  Luigi Rizzi,et al.  Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction , 2006, Cognition.

[26]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  Object Attraction in Subject-Verb Agreement Construction , 2001 .

[27]  Neal J. Pearlmutter,et al.  Effects of Semantic Integration on Phrase and Word Ordering Errors in Production , 2011, CogSci.

[28]  Jason M. Brenier,et al.  Predictability Effects on Durations of Content and Function Words in Conversational English , 2009 .

[29]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[30]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Marked Effect of Number on Subject–Verb Agreement☆ , 1997 .

[31]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[32]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[33]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  Effects of Frequency and Vocabulary Type on Phonological Speech Errors , 1990 .

[34]  K. Bock Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[35]  T. Jaeger,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.

[36]  Gabriella Vigliocco,et al.  Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy , 2002 .

[37]  Eric S Solomon,et al.  Semantic integration and syntactic planning in language production , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  J L Nicol Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[39]  Christopher T. Kello,et al.  Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[40]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[41]  T. Florian Jaeger,et al.  Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density , 2010, Cognitive Psychology.

[42]  Maryellen C MacDonald,et al.  Constituent structure and linear order in language production: evidence from subject-verb agreement. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[43]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[44]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The interplay of meaning, sound, and syntax in sentence production. , 2002, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[46]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  The Contributions of Verb Bias and Plausibility to the Comprehension of Temporarily Ambiguous Sentences , 1997 .

[47]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[48]  Neal J. Pearlmutter,et al.  Effects of Semantic Integration and Advance Planning on Grammatical Encoding in Sentence Production , 2011, CogSci.