Coordination of what and where in Visual Attention

Performance often suffers when two visual discriminations must be made concurrently (‘divided attention’). In the modular primate visual system, different cortical areas analyse different kinds of visual information. Especially important is a distinction between an occipitoparietal ‘where?’ system, analysing spatial relations, and an occipitotemporal ‘what?’ system responsible for object recognition. Though such visual subsystems are anatomically parallel, their functional relationship when ‘what?’ and ‘where?’ discriminations are made concurrently is unknown. In the present experiments, human subjects made concurrent discriminations concerning a brief visual display. Discriminations were either similar (two ‘what?’ or two ‘where?’ discriminations) or dissimilar (one of each), and concerned the same or different objects. When discriminations concerned different objects, there was strong interference between them. This was equally severe whether discriminations were similar—and therefore dependent on the same cortical system—or dissimilar. When concurrent ‘what?’ and ‘where?’ discriminations concerned the same object, however, all interference disappeared. Such results suggest that ‘what?’ and ‘where?’ systems are coordinated in visual attention: their separate outputs can be used simultaneously without cost, but only when they concern one object.

[1]  David M. Green,et al.  Detection of Multiple Component Signals in Noise , 1958 .

[2]  U. Neisser Decision-time without reaction-time: Experiments in visual scanning. , 1963 .

[3]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[4]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Multidimensional stimulus identification , 1969 .

[5]  D. Alanallport Parallel encoding within and between elementary stimulus dimensions , 1971 .

[6]  Alan M. Wing,et al.  Multidimensional encoding of visual form , 1972 .

[7]  Howard E. Egeth,et al.  Parallel processing of multielement displays , 1972 .

[8]  R D Sorkin,et al.  Simultaneous two-channel signal detection. 3. 630- and 1400-Hz signals. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Inge Fryklund,et al.  Effects of cued-set spatial arrangement and target-background similarity in the partial-report paradigm , 1975 .

[10]  N Moray,et al.  Attention, practice, and semantic targets. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  D. Robinson,et al.  Parietal association cortex in the primate: sensory mechanisms and behavioral modulations. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  S. Zeki Uniformity and diversity of structure and function in rhesus monkey prestriate visual cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  J. Duncan The locus of interference in the perception of simultaneous stimuli. , 1980, Psychological review.

[14]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[15]  John Duncan,et al.  The demonstration of capacity limitation , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  D. Robinson,et al.  Behavioral enhancement of visual responses in monkey cerebral cortex. I. Modulation in posterior parietal cortex related to selective visual attention. , 1981, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect of inattention on form perception. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Drew H. Abney,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Influence of Musical Groove on Postural Sway , 2015 .

[19]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[20]  R. Desimone,et al.  Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  F. Crick Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  A. Treisman,et al.  Search asymmetry: a diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  John R. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and visual attention , 1985 .

[25]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[26]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual properties of neurons in area V4 of the macaque: sensitivity to stimulus form. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  R Vogels,et al.  The Effect of Feature Uncertainty on Spatial Discriminations , 1988, Perception.

[28]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[29]  H Egeth,et al.  Subitizing: Direct apprehension or serial processing? , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  H. Pashler Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Chronometric Evidence for Central Postponement in Temporally Overlapping Tasks , 2003 .

[32]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[33]  D. Sagi,et al.  Texture-Based Tasks are Little Affected by Second Tasks Requiring Peripheral or Central Attentive Fixation , 1991, Perception.

[34]  Cheryl L. Grady,et al.  Mapping the functional neuroanatomy of the intact human brain with brain work imaging , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  H Pashler,et al.  Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  J. Duncan Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and objects , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[37]  A. Treisman Visual Attention and the Perception of Features and Objects , 1994 .