Forensic assessment of a bridge downfall using Bayesian networks

Abstract Bayesian networks proved to be a useful tool in many technical fields as well as in forensic sciences. The present paper proposes a novel application of Bayesian networks in forensic engineering, focusing on the analysis of technical causes of a catastrophic bridge downfall. During repair a road bridge over important railway lines suddenly slipped down from temporary supports. Incidentally at the same time an intercity train approached the location and crashed into the collapsed bridge at a high speed. The accident resulted in great societal and economic consequences. Forensic investigation concerning causes of the bridge collapse was complicated due to the additional damage caused by the train. Moreover, the remaining structural elements of the collapsed bridge and temporary supports were shortly after the accident removed to renew railway traffic. Background materials of the investigation and additional detailed structural analyses did not reveal any convincing evidence of the initiation cause. Critical consideration of all possible causes including aerodynamic effects supplemented by a causal (Bayesian) network finally resulted in identification of the most significant causes including insufficient foundation and overall stiffness of temporary supports.

[1]  Finn V. Jensen,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[2]  Marc A. Maes,et al.  Bayesian framework for managing preferences in decision-making , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Robert L. Winkler,et al.  Combining Probability Distributions From Experts in Risk Analysis , 1999 .

[4]  Daniel Straub,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian Network for Probabilistic Modeling of Tunnel Excavation Processes , 2013, Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastructure Eng..

[5]  Milan Holicky PROBABILISTIC RISK OPTIMIZATION OF ROAD TUNNELS , 2009 .

[6]  Robert E. Melchers,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Engineering Systems , 1997 .

[7]  Paolo Garbolino,et al.  Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[8]  Judea Pearl,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems - networks of plausible inference , 1991, Morgan Kaufmann series in representation and reasoning.

[9]  Richard E. Neapolitan,et al.  Probabilistic reasoning in expert systems - theory and algorithms , 2012 .

[10]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[11]  Roger M. Cooke,et al.  Fifteen years of expert judgement at TUDelft , 2008 .

[12]  大西 仁,et al.  Pearl, J. (1988, second printing 1991). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan-Kaufmann. , 1994 .

[13]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Statistics in Practice , 2005 .

[14]  Daniel Straub,et al.  A Bayesian probabilistic framework for avalanche modelling based on observations , 2006 .

[15]  F Taroni,et al.  A general approach to Bayesian networks for the interpretation of evidence. , 2004, Forensic science international.

[16]  Milan Holický,et al.  Assessment of Flooding Risk to Cultural Heritage in Historic Sites , 2010 .