Impact of Source and Destination Movement on MANET Performance Considering BATMAN and AODV Protocols

In recent years, MANETs are continuing to attract the attention for their potential use in several fields such as military activities, rescue operations and time-critical applications. In this paper, we present the implementation and analysis of our implemented MANET testbed considering AODV and BATMAN protocols for wireless multi-hop networking. We investigate the effect of mobility and topology changing in MANET. We evaluate the performance of the routing protocols through experiments in real environment. In this work, we consider four scenarios: Static, Source Moving, Destination Moving and Source-Destination Moving. We assess the performance of our testbed in terms of throughput, number of dropped packets and delay. We found that, when routes are changing often, the BATMAN has better performance than AODV because it put the packets in a buffer. While, because AODV is a reactive protocol, it introduces some delay in the network.

[1]  Leonard Barolli,et al.  Impact of radio randomness on performances of lattice wireless sensors networks based on event-reliability concept , 2006, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[2]  David Taniar,et al.  Continuous Range Search Query Processing in Mobile Navigation , 2008, 2008 14th IEEE International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[3]  Martin Mauve,et al.  A survey on real-world implementations of mobile ad-hoc networks , 2007, Ad Hoc Networks.

[4]  Tomoya Enokido,et al.  Design and evaluation of reliable data transmission protocol in wireless sensor networks , 2008, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[6]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Implementation and performance evaluation of two fuzzy-based handover systems for wireless cellular networks , 2009 .

[7]  Jérôme Haerri,et al.  A realistic mobility simulator for vehicular ad hoc networks , 2005 .

[8]  Leonard Barolli,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Link Quality Extension in Multihop Wireless Mobile Ad-hoc Networks , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems.

[9]  David Taniar,et al.  On Mining Movement Pattern from Mobile Users , 2007, Int. J. Distributed Sens. Networks.

[10]  Per Gunningberg,et al.  Lessons from experimental MANET research , 2005, Ad Hoc Networks.

[11]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Do you know what you are generating? , 2007, CoNEXT '07.

[12]  Mike E. Woodward,et al.  Performance evaluation with different mobility models for dynamic probabilistic flooding in MANETs , 2009 .

[13]  Jeremy Pitt,et al.  Multiagent based information dissemination in vehicular ad hoc networks , 2009 .

[14]  Christian F. Tschudin,et al.  Coping with communication gray zones in IEEE 802.11b based ad hoc networks , 2002, WOWMOM '02.

[15]  Paal E. Engelstad,et al.  Routing of internal MANET traffic over external networks , 2009 .

[16]  Joseph Y. Halpern,et al.  Gossip-based ad hoc routing , 2002, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[17]  David Taniar,et al.  Mining Frequency Pattern from Mobile Users , 2004, KES.

[18]  Axel Neumann,et al.  Better Approach To Mobile Ad-hoc Networking (B.A.T.M.A.N.) , 2008 .

[19]  Mimoza Durresi,et al.  Architecture for mobile Heterogeneous Multi Domain networks , 2010 .

[20]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Performance Analysis of OLSR and BATMAN Protocols Considering Link Quality Parameter , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications.

[21]  Vikas Kawadia,et al.  Experimental investigations into TCP performance over wireless multihop networks , 2005, E-WIND '05.