The Internal Audit Function: Perceptions of Internal Audit Roles, Effectiveness, and Evaluation

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide insights into the current roles and responsibilities of the internal audit (IA) function and the factors perceived to be necessary to ensure its effectiveness. The current performance evaluation practices of IA are also examined. Design/methodology/approach - Semi-structured interviews were utilised to elicit the perceptions of key corporate governance actors about the evolving role of IA, as well as IA effectiveness, in terms of its design, measurement and evaluation. Findings - The results of the study suggest significant expansion and refocus of the role of IA and perceptions of its effectiveness. However, the findings also suggest that performance evaluation mechanisms of IA have not evolved contemporaneously. The misalignment between the role and evaluation gives rise to difficulty in assessing the extent to which IA functions are meeting stakeholders' expectations. Practical implications - The findings are useful in informing the deliberations of regulators and standard setters, as well as providing a benchmark for internal auditors and audit committees. The insights are also relevant for external auditors who are required to consider various aspects of corporate governance, including the objectivity and quality of IA. Originality/value - The use of semi-structured interviews facilitates an in-depth insight and understanding of the perceptions of roles, effectiveness and evaluation of IA and adds depth to the predominantly questionnaire-based survey approach of prior studies.

[1]  H. Murdock,et al.  The Role of Internal Audit , 2012 .

[2]  Robert R. Moeller,et al.  Brink's Modern Internal Auditing: A Common Body of Knowledge , 2009 .

[3]  Brendan O'Dwyer,et al.  Stakeholder Democracy: Challenges and Contributions from Social Accounting , 2005 .

[4]  L. Paape,et al.  The Relationship Between the Internal Audit Function and Corporate Governance in the EU – a Survey , 2003 .

[5]  R. Craig,et al.  Factors associated with the adoption of risk-based internal auditing , 2009 .

[6]  William F. Messier,et al.  A hierarchical approach to the external auditor's evaluation of the internal auditing function* , 1988 .

[7]  A. Wright,et al.  The Corporate Governance Mosaic and Financial Reporting Quality , 2008 .

[8]  Yves Gendron,et al.  On the constitution of audit committee effectiveness , 2006 .

[9]  Albert L. Nagy,et al.  Internal Audit Professionalism and Section 404 Compliance: The View of Chief Audit Executives from Northeast Ohio , 2007 .

[10]  Pamela Kent,et al.  The use of internal audit by Australian companies , 2006 .

[11]  Colin B. Ferguson,et al.  Internal Audit, Alternative Internal Audit Structures and the Level of Misappropriation of Assets Fraud , 2008 .

[12]  Dana R. Hermanson,et al.  The Audit Committee Oversight Process , 2009 .

[13]  L. Spira,et al.  Audit Committees: Begging the Question? , 2003 .

[14]  G. Sarens,et al.  Internal auditors' perception about their role in risk management : A comparison between US and Belgian companies , 2006 .

[15]  Mary S. Schaeffer,et al.  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 , 2012 .

[16]  J. A. Hansen,et al.  Agents of change: universities as development hubs , 2006 .

[17]  G. Sarens,et al.  Internal audit: A comfort provider to the audit committee , 2009 .

[18]  G. Tanewski,et al.  Voluntary Demand for Internal and External Auditing by Family Businesses , 2000 .

[19]  R. Houston,et al.  The Impact of Internal Auditor Compensation and Role on External Auditors' Planning Judgments and Decisions* , 2001 .

[20]  Marika Arena,et al.  Internal Audit Departments: Adoption and Characteristics in Italian Companies , 2007 .

[21]  Ganesh Krishnamoorthy,et al.  Corporate Governance in the Post Sarbanes-Oxley Era: Auditor Experiences , 2009 .

[22]  M. Zaman,et al.  Audit Committee Effectiveness: Informal Processes and Behavioural Effects , 2007 .

[23]  J. H. Frey,et al.  The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement. , 2005 .

[24]  Dana R. Hermanson,et al.  Changes in Internal Auditing During the Time of the Major U.S. Accounting Scandals , 2005 .

[25]  Ganesh Krishnamoorthy,et al.  A Multistage Approach to External Auditors' Evaluation of the Internal Audit Function , 2002 .

[26]  Aaron Cohen,et al.  The Effectiveness of Internal Auditing: An Empirical Examination of its Determinants in Israeli Organisations , 2010 .

[27]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Consideration of Industry Traits and Corporate Governance Mechanisms , 2000 .

[28]  Maurice Gosselin,et al.  Getting Inside the Black Box: A Field Study of Practices in “Effective” Audit Committees , 2004 .

[29]  Yves Gendron,et al.  Discussion of "The Audit Committee Oversight Process": Advocating Openness in Accounting Research* , 2009 .

[30]  Martine Bantuelle,et al.  [The agents of change]. , 2011, Sante publique.

[31]  N. Subramaniam,et al.  Internal Auditors Assessment of Their Contribution to Financial Statement Audits: The Relation With Audit Committee and Internal Audit Function Characteristics , 2006 .

[32]  M. Suwaidan,et al.  External auditors' reliance on internal auditors and its impact on audit fees: An empirical investigation , 2010 .

[33]  P. Robertson,et al.  The role of internal audit in corporate governance and management , 2003 .

[34]  N. Subramaniam,et al.  Internal Auditor Perceptions on Audit Committee Interactions: A Qualitative Study in Malaysian Public Corporations , 2007 .

[35]  D. Jovanović,et al.  Empirical Research on Internal Audit Position of Companies in Serbia , 2011 .