Information Technology and Process Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Complementarities between IT and Non-IT Resources

Drawing on the resource-based view of the firm, which has emerged as a potential integrating paradigm for strategy research, this research proposes and tests an integrated framework to explain how IT may influence firm performance. The framework recognizes that IT is most likely to affect a firm’s performance through its impact on intermediate processes, and draws on resource-based theory to examine how IT resources and capabilities can create business value and provide a competitive advantage. Specifically, we develop hypotheses regarding the differential and complementary role of various IT resources and non-IT (Human and Business) resources and capabilities in achieving quality customer-centric focus for the firm, a critical cross-functional intermediate performance metric. These hypotheses are currently being empirically tested in the context of the third party logistics (3PL) industry, in which this customer focus is widely perceived as being strategically important with IT playing a significant, if not pivotal role. The potential contributions of the work are discussed.

[1]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology , 1995, DATB.

[2]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[3]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Influence of IT Management Practice on IT Use in Large Organizations , 1994, MIS Q..

[4]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .

[5]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Develop Long-Term Competitiveness through IT Assets , 1996 .

[6]  Christina Soh,et al.  How IT Creates Business Value: A Process Theory Synthesis , 1995, ICIS.

[7]  F. F. Reichheld,et al.  Zero defections: quality comes to services. , 1990, Harvard business review.

[8]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[9]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  A. Barua,et al.  An Integrated Assessment of Productivity and Efficiency Impacts of Information Technology Investments: Old Data, New Analysis and Evidence , 1999 .

[11]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  The Intangible Costs and Benefits of Computer Investments: Evidence from the Financial Markets , 2001 .

[12]  Peter Weill,et al.  The Relationship Between Investment in Information Technology and Firm Performance: A Study of the Valve Manufacturing Sector , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[14]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Information Technology Effects on Firm Performance as Measured by Tobin's q , 1999 .

[15]  Lorin M. Hitt,et al.  Productivity, Business Profitability, and Consumer Surplus: Three Different Measures of Information Technology Value , 1996, MIS Q..

[16]  Nirup M. Menon,et al.  Productivity of Information Systems in the Healthcare Industry , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[17]  Nirup M. Menon,et al.  Information Technology Value through Different Normative Lenses , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[18]  T. C. Powell,et al.  Information technology as competitive advantage: the role of human , 1997 .

[19]  G. Stalk,et al.  Competing on capabilities: the new rules of corporate strategy. , 1992, Harvard business review.