The dynamics of sensory buffers: geometric, spatial, and experience-dependent shaping of iconic memory.

When a stimulus is presented, its sensory trace decays rapidly, lasting for approximately 1000 ms. This brief and labile memory, referred as iconic memory, serves as a buffer before information is transferred to working memory and executive control. Here we explored the effect of different factors--geometric, spatial, and experience--with respect to the access and the maintenance of information in iconic memory and the progressive distortion of this memory. We studied performance in a partial report paradigm, a design wherein recall of only part of a stimulus array is required. Subjects had to report the identity of a letter in a location that was cued in a variable delay after the stimulus onset. Performance decayed exponentially with time, and we studied the different parameters (time constant, zero-delay value, and decay amplitude) as a function of the different factors. We observed that experience (determined by letter frequency) affected the access to iconic memory but not the temporal decay constant. On the contrary, spatial position affected the temporal course of delay. The entropy of the error distribution increased with time reflecting a progressive morphological distortion of the iconic buffer. We discuss our results on the context of a model of information access to executive control and how it is affected by learning and attention.

[1]  J. M. Cattell THE TIME TAKEN UP BY CEREBRAL OPERATIONS , 1886 .

[2]  M. Mishkin,et al.  Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[4]  E. Averbach,et al.  Short-term memory in vision , 1961 .

[5]  M. Eden,et al.  Note on Short Term Storage of Information in Vision , 1964, Perceptual and motor skills.

[6]  A. Baddeley The Influence of Acoustic and Semantic Similarity on Long-term Memory for Word Sequences , 1966, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  Robert B. Ash,et al.  Information Theory , 2020, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[8]  W N Dember,et al.  Recovery of Masked Visual Targets by Inhibition of the Masking Stimulus , 1967, Science.

[9]  A D Baddeley,et al.  How Does Acoustic Similarity Influence Short-Term Memory? , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  Michael T. Turvey,et al.  Retrieval from iconic memory with shape as the selection criterion , 1970 .

[11]  H. BOUMA,et al.  Interaction Effects in Parafoveal Letter Recognition , 1970, Nature.

[12]  J. V. von Wright,et al.  Selection in Visual Immediate Memory , 1968, Acta psychologica.

[13]  J. Townsend Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix , 1971 .

[14]  H. Bouma Visual recognition of isolated lower-case letters. , 1971, Vision research.

[15]  M. Coltheart,et al.  Iconic memory and visible persistence , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  L O Harvey,et al.  Identification confusions among letters of the alphabet. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  S. Chow Iconic memory, location information, and partial report. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  E. Yund,et al.  Scanning the visual field without eye movements—A sex difference , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  F. Blommaert Early-visual factors in letter confusions. , 1988, Spatial vision.

[22]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[23]  E. Yund,et al.  Detectability as a function of target location: Effects of spatial configuration , 1990, Brain and Cognition.

[24]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[25]  J. Palmer Attentional limits on the perception and memory of visual information. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Visual detectability gradients: Effect of illiteracy , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[27]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  J. Duncan,et al.  On the time course of perceptual information that results from a brief visual presentation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  G. Sperling,et al.  Information transfer in iconic memory experiments. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  P Cavanagh,et al.  Familiarity and pop-out in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[31]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  E. W. Yund,et al.  Spatial Nonuniformities in Visual Search , 1996, Brain and Cognition.

[33]  R. Frackowiak,et al.  Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Pieter R. Roelfsema,et al.  Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey , 1998, Nature.

[35]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Letter legibility and visual word recognition , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[37]  C. Latimer,et al.  Attentional Biases in Geometric form Perception , 2000, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[38]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to find a shape , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[39]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  A. Goldstein,et al.  A comparison of upper vs. lower and right vs. left visual fields using lexical decision , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to see: experience and attention in primary visual cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  C. Gilbert,et al.  The Neural Basis of Perceptual Learning , 2001, Neuron.

[43]  D. Mumford,et al.  Neural activity in early visual cortex reflects behavioral experience and higher-order perceptual saliency , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  G. Woodman,et al.  Voluntary and automatic attentional control of visual working memory , 2002 .

[45]  J. Feldman What is a visual object? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[46]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The remarkable inefficiency of word recognition , 2003, Nature.

[47]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  J. Changeux,et al.  A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  Zoe Kourtzi,et al.  Shape Saliency Modulates Contextual Processing in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  T. Nazir,et al.  Reading habits, perceptual learning, and recognition of printed words , 2004, Brain and Language.

[51]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Perceptual learning and top-down influences in primary visual cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  Morten L. Kringelbach,et al.  Visual word recognition: the first half second , 2004, NeuroImage.

[53]  B. Dosher,et al.  Fast decay of iconic memory in observers with mild cognitive impairments. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  J. Feldman,et al.  Information along contours and object boundaries. , 2005, Psychological review.

[55]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[56]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Top-Down Reorganization of Activity in the Visual Pathway after Learning a Shape Identification Task , 2005, Neuron.

[57]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Attention Lights Up New Object Representations before the Old Ones Fade Away , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[58]  E. Vogel,et al.  Interactions between attention and working memory , 2006, Neuroscience.

[59]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[60]  N. Cowan,et al.  Visual working memory depends on attentional filtering , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[61]  Jeffrey R. Binder,et al.  Tuning of the human left fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure , 2006, NeuroImage.

[62]  Karl Magnus Petersson,et al.  The impact of reading and writing skills on a visuo-motor integration task: A comparison between illiterate and literate subjects , 2007, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[63]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[64]  B. Wandell,et al.  Differential sensitivity to words and shapes in ventral occipito-temporal cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[65]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Brain States: Top-Down Influences in Sensory Processing , 2007, Neuron.

[66]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Learning to Link Visual Contours , 2008, Neuron.