Assesssing the prospective resource base for enhanced geothermal systems in Europe

In this study the resource base for EGS (enhanced geothermal systems) in Europe was quantified and economically constrained, applying a discounted cash-flow model to different techno-economic scenarios for future EGS in 2020, 2030, and 2050. Temperature is a critical parameter that controls the amount of thermal energy available in the subsurface. Therefore, the first step in assessing the European resource base for EGS is the construction of a subsurface temperature model of onshore Europe. Subsurface temperatures were computed to a depth of 10 km below ground level for a regular 3-D hexahedral grid with a horizontal resolution of 10 km and a vertical resolution of 250 m. Vertical conductive heat transport was considered as the main heat transfer mechanism. Surface temperature and basal heat flow were used as boundary conditions for the top and bottom of the model, respectively. If publicly available, the most recent and comprehensive regional temperature models, based on data from wells, were incorporated With the modeled subsurface temperatures and future technical and economic scenarios, the technical potential and minimum levelized cost of energy (LCOE) were calculated for each grid cell of the temperature model. Calculations for a typical EGS scenario yield costs of EUR 215 MWh-1 in 2020, EUR 127 MWH-1 in 2030, and EUR 70 MWh-1 in 2050 are imposed to the calculated LCOE values in each grid cell to limit the technical potential, resulting in an economic potential for Europe of 19GWe in 2020, 22GWe in 2030, and 522GWe in 2050. The results of our approach do not only provide an indication of prospective areas for future EGS in Europe, but also show a more realistic cost determined and depth-dependent distribution of the technical potential by applying different well cost models for 2020, 2030, and 2050

[1]  César R. Chamorro,et al.  Enhanced geothermal systems in Europe: An estimation and comparison of the technical and sustainable potentials , 2014 .

[2]  J. Verweij,et al.  Subsurface temperature of the onshore Netherlands: new temperature dataset and modelling , 2012, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[3]  P. Calcagno,et al.  Estimation of the deep geothermal potential within the Tertiary Limagne basin (French Massif Central): An integrated 3D geological and thermal approach , 2014 .

[4]  B. Bourgine,et al.  Subsurface temperature maps in French sedimentary basins: new data compilation and interpolation , 2010 .

[5]  I. Artemieva Lithosphere: Subject index , 2011 .

[6]  Ernst Huenges,et al.  Geothermal energy systems : exploration, development, and utilization , 2010 .

[7]  Martin Kaltschmitt,et al.  Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs , 2010 .

[8]  Chad Augustine,et al.  UPDATED U.S. GEOTHERMAL SUPPLY CURVE , 2010 .

[9]  C. Bassin,et al.  The Current Limits of resolution for surface wave tomography in North America , 2000 .

[10]  I. Artemieva Lithosphere: Geographical index , 2011 .

[11]  Alan G. Jones,et al.  Europe from the bottom up: A statistical examination of the central and northern European lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary from comparing seismological and electromagnetic observations , 2010 .

[12]  H. Pollack,et al.  On the regional variation of heat flow, geotherms, and lithospheric thickness☆ , 1977 .

[13]  D. Blackwell,et al.  Assessment of the Enhanced Geothermal System Resource Base of the United States , 2007 .

[14]  S. Cloetingh,et al.  EuCRUST‐07: A new reference model for the European crust , 2008 .

[15]  Garvin Heath,et al.  Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation: Geothermal Energy , 2011 .

[16]  J. L. Parra,et al.  Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas , 2005 .

[17]  Gioia Falcone,et al.  A systematic review of enhanced (or engineered) geothermal systems: past, present and future , 2013, Geothermal Energy.

[18]  T. Pharaoh Palaeozoic terranes and their lithospheric boundaries within the Trans-European Suture Zone (TESZ): a review , 1999 .

[19]  C. Amante,et al.  ETOPO1 arc-minute global relief model : procedures, data sources and analysis , 2009 .

[20]  Graeme Beardsmore,et al.  A protocol for estimating and mapping global EGS potential , 2010 .

[21]  M. Pluymaekers,et al.  Direct heat resource assessment and subsurface information systems for geothermal aquifers; the Dutch perspective , 2012, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[22]  David S. Chapman,et al.  Heat production and geotherms for the continental lithosphere , 2011 .

[23]  Thorsten Agemar,et al.  Subsurface temperature distribution in Germany , 2012 .

[24]  I. Artemieva Lithosphere: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 2011 .

[25]  C. Augustine Updated U.S. Geothermal Supply Characterization and Representation for Market Penetration Model Input , 2011 .

[26]  Albert Genter,et al.  Structure of hydrothermal convection in the Upper Rhine Graben as inferred from corrected temperature data and basin-scale numerical models , 2012 .

[27]  Ennio Macchi,et al.  Binary ORC (Organic Rankine Cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part B: Techno-economic optimization , 2014 .

[28]  H. Mijnlieff,et al.  Geothermal aquifer performance assessment for direct heat production – Methodology and application to Rotliegend aquifers , 2012, Netherlands Journal of Geosciences - Geologie en Mijnbouw.

[29]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Ideal thermal efficiency for geothermal binary plants , 2007 .

[30]  Manel Fernàndez,et al.  Radiogenic heat production variability of some common lithological groups and its significance to lithospheric thermal modeling , 2010 .

[31]  M. Kubik The Future of Geothermal Energy , 2006 .

[32]  Thomas Hantschel,et al.  Fundamentals of Basin and Petroleum Systems Modeling , 2009 .

[33]  Subir K. Sanyal,et al.  Sustainability and Renewability of Geothermal Power Capacity , 2005 .

[34]  Chad R. Augustine,et al.  Hydrothermal Spallation Drilling and Advanced Energy Conversion Technologies for Engineered Geothermal Systems , 2009 .

[35]  Mehmet Kanoglu,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic analysis and optimization of power cycles for a medium temperature geothermal resource , 2014 .

[36]  V. Stefánsson,et al.  World Geothermal Assessment , 2005 .

[37]  Philippe Lutz,et al.  The deep EGS (Enhanced Geothermal System) project at Soultz-sous-Forêts (Alsace, France) , 2006 .

[38]  Ladislaus Rybach,et al.  "The Future of Geothermal Energy" and Its Challenges , 2010 .

[39]  Andrew Kingdon,et al.  The measured shallow temperature field in Britain , 2011 .

[40]  F. Bergen,et al.  Probabilistic tectonic heat flow modeling for basin maturation: Assessment method and applications , 2009 .

[41]  Ruggero Bertani,et al.  Geothermal power generation in the world 2005–2010 update report , 2012 .

[42]  Ben Norden,et al.  Lithosphere tectonics and thermo-mechanical properties: An integrated modelling approach for Enhanced Geothermal Systems exploration in Europe , 2010 .