Nanotechnology in the City: Sustainability Challenges and Anticipatory Governance

Visions about the use of nanotechnologies in the city, including in the design and construction of built environments, suggest that these technologies could be critically important for solving urban sustainability problems. We argue that such visions often overlook two critical and interrelated elements. First, conjectures about future nano-enhanced cities tend to rely on flawed concepts of urban sustainability that underestimate the challenges presented by deeply-rooted paradigms of market economics, risk assessment, and the absorption of disruptive technologies. Second, opportunities for stakeholders such as city officials, non-governmental organizations, and citizens to consider the nature and distribution of the potential benefits and adverse effects of nano-enabled urban technologies are rarely triggered sufficiently early. Limitations in early engagement will lead to problems and missed opportunities in the use of nanotechnologies for urban sustainability. In this article, we critically explore ideas about the nano-enhanced city and its promises and limitations related to urban sustainability. On this base, we outline an agenda for engaged research to support anticipatory governance of nanotechnologies in cities.

[1]  Simon Brown,et al.  The new deficit model. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[2]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Patterns of nanotechnology innovation and governance within a metropolitan area , 2013 .

[3]  J. Besley,et al.  Expert opinion on nanotechnology: risks, benefits, and regulation , 2008 .

[4]  Alf Hornborg,et al.  The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment , 2001 .

[5]  Anthony Perl,et al.  Supporting Global Sustainability by Rethinking the City , 2007 .

[6]  J. Dupuy,et al.  Some pitfalls in the philosophical foundations of nanoethics. , 2007, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[7]  George Bugliarello,et al.  Critical New Bio-Socio-Technological Challenges in Urban Sustainability , 2011 .

[8]  Kaoru Dokko,et al.  Nanotechnology for Material Development on Future Energy Storage , 2010 .

[9]  D. Satterthwaite The implications of population growth and urbanization for climate change , 2009 .

[10]  Alessandro Aurigi New Technologies, Same Dilemmas: Policy and Design Issues for the Augmented City , 2006 .

[11]  G. Bugliarello Urban sustainability: science, technology, and policies , 2004 .

[12]  Pedro J. J. Alvarez,et al.  Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations. , 2010, ACS nano.

[13]  Prasad Boradkar,et al.  Prototyping Nanotechnology: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Responsible Innovation , 2010 .

[14]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Sustainability Science , 2019, Critical Skills for Environmental Professionals.

[15]  Peter Newell,et al.  Corporate accountability to the poor? Assessing the effectiveness of community-based strategies , 2005 .

[16]  Joachim Schummer,et al.  Cultural diversity in nanotechnology ethics. , 2011, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[17]  Nii O. Attoh-Okine,et al.  Nanotechnology in Civil Infrastructure : A Paradigm Shift , 2011 .

[18]  F. Southworth,et al.  Shrinking the Carbon Footprint of Metropolitan America , 2008 .

[19]  Akhlesh Lakhtakia,et al.  Green Nanotechnology: Solutions for Sustainability and Energy in the Built Environment, by G. B. Smith and C. G. Granqvist , 2010 .

[20]  J. E. Groves,et al.  Made in America: Science, Technology and American Modernist Poets , 1989 .

[21]  Mark Gottdiener,et al.  Urban Problems in Global Perspective , 2004 .

[22]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Systemic scenarios of nanotechnology: Sustainable governance of emerging technologies , 2009 .

[23]  Gerry Mooney,et al.  Unruly Cities? : Order/Disorder , 2006 .

[24]  A. Spicer Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[25]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Sustainable governance of emerging technologies—Critical constellations in the agent network of nanotechnology , 2007 .

[26]  Todd F. Barker,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Poor: Opportunities , 2009 .

[27]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  From complex systems analysis to transformational change: a comparative appraisal of sustainability science projects , 2012, Sustainability Science.

[28]  G. Foladori,et al.  Nanotechnology and the developing world: will nanotechnology overcome poverty or widen disparities? , 2005 .

[29]  Alan Gilbert,et al.  Cities, Poverty and Development: Urbanization in the Third World , 1982 .

[30]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  How fast should nanotechnology advance , 2007 .

[31]  E. Ostrom A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Ralf Brand,et al.  Urban infrastructures and sustainable social practices , 2005 .

[33]  L Wallis,et al.  Causing a stir. , 2001, Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987).

[34]  Lang Tran,et al.  There's plenty of room at the forum: Potential risks and safety assessment of engineered nanomaterials , 2007 .

[35]  Susan E. Cozzens,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development , 2011 .

[36]  R. Hurt,et al.  Nanotoxicology: the asbestos analogy revisited. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[37]  Claes G. Granqvist,et al.  Green Nanotechnology: Solutions for Sustainability and Energy in the Built Environment, by G. B. Smith and C. G. Granqvist , 2010 .

[38]  A. Hommels,et al.  Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies , 2005 .

[39]  Richard Nelson,et al.  Three rules for technological fixes , 2008, Nature.

[40]  D. Satterthwaite Cities' contribution to global warming: notes on the allocation of greenhouse gas emissions , 2008 .

[41]  Christine Ogilvie Robichaud,et al.  Estimates of upper bounds and trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Joseph F. Coates,et al.  Technology and the Changing City , 2001 .

[43]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[44]  S. Priest,et al.  Risk perceptions starting to shift? U.S. citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnology , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[45]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Is there a shift to “active nanostructures”? , 2009, Journal of nanoparticle research : an interdisciplinary forum for nanoscale science and technology.

[46]  Michael V. Liga,et al.  Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. , 2008, Water research.

[47]  Christian E. H. Beaudrie,et al.  Anticipating the perceived risk of nanotechnologies. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[48]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  Envisioning nanotechnology: New media and future-oriented stakeholder dialogue , 2010 .

[49]  Donald Maclurcan,et al.  Nanotechnology and Developing Countries – Part 2: What Realities? , 2010 .

[50]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Developing World , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[51]  C. Kennedy,et al.  The Changing Metabolism of Cities , 2007 .

[52]  Dorothy Nelkin,et al.  The politics of housing innovation : the fate of the Civilian Industrial Technology Program , 1973 .

[53]  P. Shapira,et al.  Follow the money , 2010, Nature.

[54]  Ângela Guimarães Pereira,et al.  Citizen engagement and urban change: Three case studies of material deliberation , 2012 .

[55]  Steffen Foss Hansen,et al.  Late lessons from early warnings for nanotechnology. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[56]  Maj Munch Andersen,et al.  Nanotechnologies for Climate Friendly Construction – Key Issues and Challenges , 2009 .

[57]  Jo Anne Shatkin,et al.  Nanotechnology: Health and Environmental Risks , 2008 .

[58]  David H. Guston,et al.  Innovation policy: not just a jumbo shrimp , 2008, Nature.

[59]  H. Kastenholz,et al.  Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology Hazards , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[60]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  From enabling technology to applications: The evolution of risk perceptions about nanotechnology , 2011 .

[61]  D. Warheit,et al.  Health effects related to nanoparticle exposures: environmental, health and safety considerations for assessing hazards and risks. , 2008, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[62]  Peter Evans,et al.  Livable Cities?: Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainability , 2002 .

[63]  Jeffrey S. Moore,et al.  Introduction: self-healing polymers and composites , 2007, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[64]  Daniel Barben,et al.  Analyzing acceptance politics: Towards an epistemological shift in the public understanding of science and technology , 2010 .

[65]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Nanotech: good or bad? , 2009 .

[66]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Rethinking the Relational Socio-Technical Materialities of Cities and ICTs , 2011 .

[67]  Jennifer M Murphy,et al.  Gaining perspective on the water-energy nexus at the community scale. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[68]  Thomas M. Parris,et al.  Sustainability Values, Attitudes, and Behaviors: A Review of Multinational and Global Trends , 2006 .

[69]  David H. Guston,et al.  Real-time technology assessment , 2020, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[70]  Nina Liao Combining Instrumental and Contextual Approaches: Nanotechnology and Sustainable Development , 2009, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[71]  F. Wickson,et al.  Public engagement coming of age: From theory to practice in STS encounters with nanotechnology , 2011 .

[72]  Niclas Hällström,et al.  What Next? Climate change, technology and development , 2008 .

[73]  Arnim Wiek,et al.  Qualitative system analysis as a means for sustainable governance of emerging technologies: the case of nanotechnology , 2008 .

[74]  Rider W. Foley,et al.  Nanotechnology for sustainability: what does nanotechnology offer to address complex sustainability problems? , 2012, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[75]  A. Feenberg Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited , 2002 .

[76]  Geoffrey L. Cohen,et al.  Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. , 2009, Nature nanotechnology.

[77]  Eric C. Jones,et al.  The Power of the Machine: Global Inequalities of Economy, Technology, and Environment , 2005 .

[78]  F. Pacheco-Torgal,et al.  Nanotechnology: Advantages and drawbacks in the field of construction and building materials , 2011 .

[79]  Sean Fox,et al.  Urban poverty and development in the 21st century: towards an inclusive and sustainable world , 2007 .

[80]  R. Pielke,et al.  The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science , 2007 .

[81]  Cynthia Selin Expectations and the Emergence of Nanotechnology , 2007 .

[82]  Emma Frow,et al.  Sustainability and Anticipatory Governance in Synthetic Biology , 2012 .

[83]  Ashwani K. Rana,et al.  Significance of Nanotechnology in Construction Engineering , 2009 .

[84]  Cynthia Selin,et al.  The Sociology of the Future: Tracing Stories of Technology and Time , 2008 .

[85]  Rajesh Purohit,et al.  Recent Advances in Nanotechnology , 2012 .

[86]  John Pendergrass,et al.  Addressing Nanotechnology Waste and Product Disposal: Can the Superfund Safety Net Catch Tiny Particles? , 2007 .

[87]  O. Renn,et al.  Nanotechnology and the need for risk governance , 2006, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[88]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Triumph of the city , 2012 .

[89]  Timothy Beatley,et al.  Envisioning Solar Cities: Urban Futures Powered By Sustainable Energy , 2007 .

[90]  D. Maxwell,et al.  Developing sustainable products and services , 2003 .

[91]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Scientists worry about some risks more than the public. , 2007, Nature nanotechnology.

[92]  Wenzhong Zhu,et al.  Nanotechnology in Construction , 2004 .

[93]  Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.  Visualization Tools and Methods for Participatory Planning and Design , 2001 .