Left hemisphere selectivity for processing duration in normal subjects

Abstract The role of the left cerebral hemisphere for the discrimination of duration was examined in a group of normal subjects. Two tasks were presented: the first required a reaction-time response to the offset of monaural pulse sequences varying in interpulse duration, and the second required the discrimination of small differences in durations, within a delayed-comparison paradigm. In each task a right-ear advantage was obtained when the durations were 50 msec or less. No ear advantage was obtained for the larger durations of 67 to 120 msec. Since the perceptual distinctiveness of phonemes may be provided by durations approximating 50 msec, the nature of the relationship between the left hemisphere's role in temporal processing and speech processing may be elaborated.

[1]  T. Bever,et al.  The nonperceptual reality of the phoneme. , 1970 .

[2]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Representation of binaural stimuli by single units in primary auditory cortex of unanesthetized cats. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D. Kimura,et al.  Acquisition of a motor skill after left-hemisphere damage. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  M. Rosenzweig.  Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. , 1951, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  R. Efron.  TEMPORAL PERCEPTION, APHASIA AND D'EJ'A VU. , 1963, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  J. Catlin,et al.  Monaural right-ear advantage in a target-identification task , 1976, Brain and Language.

[7]  E. Zurif.  Auditory lateralization: Prosodic and syntactic factors☆ , 1974 .

[8]  Eran Zaidel,et al.  Auditory Vocabulary of the Right Hemisphere Following Brain Bisection or Hemidecortication , 1976, Cortex.

[9]  A Carmon,et al.  Effect of unilateral brain damage on perception of temporal order. , 1971, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[10]  J. W. Black,et al.  The relative ability of aphasic persons to judge the duration and intensity of pure tones. , 1970, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  R. Efron.  THE EFFECT OF HANDEDNESS ON THE PERCEPTION OF SIMULTANEITY AND TEMPORAL ORDER , 1963 .

[12]  M. Natale,et al.  Perception of nonlinguistic auditory rhythms by the speech hemisphere , 1977, Brain and Language.

[13]  Perceptual Parameters of Consonant Sounds , 1971, Language and speech.

[14]  A. Tunturi.  A study on the pathway from the medial geniculate body to the acoustic cortex in the dog. , 1946, The American journal of physiology.

[15]  E. Lenneberg.  Biological Foundations of Language , 1967 .

[16]  F. Spellacy,et al.  Lateral Preferences in the Identification of Patterned Stimuli , 1970 .

[17]  Richard A. Harshman,et al.  Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language and-or something else? , 1972 .

[18]  M. C. Gordon.  Reception and Retention Factors in Tone Duration Discriminations by Brain-Damaged and Control Patients , 1967 .

[19]  J. Graham Beaumont,et al.  Hemisphere Function in the Human Brain , 1974 .

[20]  P. Aitken.  The effects of contralateral noise on reaction time to monaural stimuli , 1976 .

[21]  A Carmon,et al.  Shift of ear superiority in dichotic listening to temporally patterned nonverbal stimuli. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  R. Harshman,et al.  Is the left hemisphere specialized for speech, language and-or something else? , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  C. L. Thompson,et al.  Dichotic speech perception: an interpretation of right-ear advantage and temporal offset effects. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  M. Studdert-Kennedy,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J. Cutting.  Different speech-processing mechanisms can be reflected in the results of discrimination and dichotic listening tasks , 1974 .

[26]  M. Annett.  A classification of hand preference by association analysis. , 1970, British journal of psychology.