Biomechanical characterization of a low density silicone elastomer filled with hollow microspheres for maxillofacial prostheses

An ideal material for maxillofacial prostheses has not been found. We created a novel material: silicone elastomer filled with hollow microspheres and characterized its biomechanical properties. Expancel hollow microspheres were mixed with MDX4-4210 silicone elastomer using Q7-9180 silicone fluid as diluent. The volume fractions of microspheres were 0, 5, 15, and 30% v/v (volume ratio to the total volume of MDX4-4210 and microspheres). The microspheres dispersed well in the matrix. The physical properties and biocompatibility of the composites were examined. Shock absorption was the greatest by the 5% v/v composite, and decreased with increasing concentrations of microspheres. The density, thermal conductivity, Shore A hardness, tear and tensile strength decreased with increasing concentrations of microspheres, while elongation at break increased. Importantly, the tear strength of all composites was markedly lower than that of pure silicone elastomer. Cell viability assays indicated that the composite was of good biocompatibility. The composite with a volume fraction of 5% exhibited the optimal properties for use as a maxillofacial prosthesis, though its tear strength was markedly lower than that of silicone elastomer. In conclusion, we developed a novel light and soft material with good flexibility and biocompatibility, which holds a promising prospect for clinical application as maxillofacial prosthesis.

[1]  Ling Zhao,et al.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of ranitidine hydrochloride loaded hollow microspheres in rabbits , 2008, Archives of pharmacal research.

[2]  Jianfeng Chen,et al.  Preparation of mesoporous silica microspheres with multi-hollow cores and their application in sustained drug release , 2010 .

[3]  D. Watts,et al.  Mechanical properties and bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  Robert Jagger,et al.  Analysis of the properties of silicone rubber maxillofacial prosthetic materials. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[5]  M. Frangou,et al.  Physical properties of a silicone prosthetic elastomer stored in simulated skin secretions. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  Yimin Zhao,et al.  Effect of nano-oxide concentration on the mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[7]  James C Lemon,et al.  Facial prosthetic rehabilitation: preprosthetic surgical techniques and biomaterials , 2005, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[8]  M. Waters,et al.  Surface modification of an experimental silicone rubber maxillofacial material to improve wettability. , 2003, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  J Middleton,et al.  An elastomeric material for facial prostheses: synthesis, experimental and numerical testing aspects. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[10]  G. Polyzois,et al.  An assessment of the physical properties and biocompatibility of three silicone elastomers. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[11]  J. Hodges,et al.  New organosilicon maxillofacial prosthetic materials. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  R. Murthy,et al.  Floating dosage systems in drug delivery. , 2002, Critical reviews in therapeutic drug carrier systems.

[13]  R. Misra,et al.  Superior in vitro biological response and mechanical properties of an implantable nanostructured biomaterial: Nanohydroxyapatite-silicone rubber composite. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[14]  Marcelo Coelho Goiato,et al.  Patient satisfaction with maxillofacial prosthesis. Literature review. , 2009, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[15]  Ayse Aytac,et al.  Properties of thermally conductive micro and nano size boron nitride reinforced silicon rubber composites , 2010 .

[16]  M. Sumita,et al.  Damping performance of polymer blend/organic filler hybrid materials with selective compatibility , 2002 .

[17]  W. Xu,et al.  Preparation of hollow hydroxyapatite microspheres by the conversion of borate glass at near room temperature , 2010 .

[18]  Guozhang Wu,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties in blends of poly(styrene‐b‐isoprene‐b‐styrene) with aromatic hydrocarbon resin , 2006 .

[19]  C. Cao,et al.  Preparation of Ni-cysteine Hollow Spheres with Ferromagnetic Property and Good Biocompatibility , 2010 .

[20]  Jiang Chang,et al.  Surfactant-assisted sonochemical synthesis of hollow calcium silicate hydrate (CSH) microspheres for drug delivery. , 2010, Ultrasonics sonochemistry.

[21]  J. Wolfaardt,et al.  Mechanical properties of a new facial prosthetic material. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  D. Watts,et al.  Bonding of maxillofacial silicone elastomers to an acrylic substrate. , 2010, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[23]  P. Cleaton-jones,et al.  Biocompatibility testing of a silicone maxillofacial prosthetic elastomer: soft tissue study in primates. , 1992, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  H. Huber,et al.  Materials and techniques in maxillofacial prosthodontic rehabilitation. , 2002, Oral and maxillofacial surgery clinics of North America.

[25]  G. T. Lim,et al.  A nanostructured carbon-reinforced polyisobutylene-based thermoplastic elastomer. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[26]  C. Sirisinha,et al.  Dynamic viscoelastic properties of experimental silicone soft lining materials. , 2010, Dental materials journal.

[27]  M. J. Waters,et al.  Designing a prosthesis to simulate the elastic properties of skin. , 2005, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[28]  L. Gettleman,et al.  Mechanical behavior of facial prosthetic elastomers after outdoor weathering. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[29]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  In vitro cytotoxicity of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: effect of accelerated aging. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[30]  L. Gettleman,et al.  Adhesive retention of silicone and chlorinated polyethylene for maxillofacial prostheses. , 2008, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[31]  Xuehong Lu,et al.  Thermal conductivity of boron nitride‐filled thermoplastics: Effect of filler characteristics and composite processing conditions , 2005 .

[32]  H. Yılmaz,et al.  Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  H. Murata,et al.  Dynamic mechanical properties of silicone maxillofacial prosthetic materials and the influence of frequency and temperature on their properties. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[34]  L. Gettleman,et al.  Effect of multi-adhesive layering on retention of extraoral maxillofacial silicone prostheses in vivo. , 2004, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.