International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science

By transforming science into a vast single market for the exchange of research products, the globalization of scientific activity effects the mechanisms by which countries enter into mutual relations. It is no longer sufficient to conduct research jointly; research must also, and perhaps above all, be conducted within the strategic space of the network. In practice, the network takes the form of a cluster of nations and emerges in response to various determining factors or constraints. This does not, however, result in arbitrary criteria of association with the network: the distance from one country or group of countries able to play a regional or continental “governance” role, cultural or linguistic affinities, geographic proximity, the recognition of common interests, the existence of political agreements on cooperation are all grounds for linkage or association. In short, the geography of exchanges is changing before our eyes. This study describes as “world-science” marked by the collectivization of the centre, “centrality” being defined not by a national monopoly, but by the “hard core” of a transnational network, stratified on a continental or subcontinental basis.

[1]  D. M. Georgoff,et al.  Harvard Business Review: David M. Georgoff and Robert G. Murdick, manager's guide to forecasting, 64 (Jan-Feb.) (1986) 110-120 , 1988 .

[2]  Elisabeth Crawford,et al.  Denationalizing science : the contexts of international scientific practice , 1993 .

[3]  M. Moravcsik Technical assistance and fundamental research in underdeveloped countries , 1964 .

[4]  E. Shils,et al.  Center and Periphery , 2013 .

[5]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  International scientific co-operation and awareness within the European community: Problems and perspectives , 1991, Scientometrics.

[6]  Kenichi Ohmae,et al.  Triad power : the coming shape of global competition , 1985 .

[7]  E. Shils,et al.  Center and periphery : essays in macrosociology , 1975 .

[8]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields 1981–1985 , 1989, Scientometrics.

[9]  Thomas Schøtt,et al.  International influence in science: Beyond center and periphery , 1988 .

[10]  Mark P. Carpenter,et al.  International Research Collaboration , 1979 .

[11]  K. Polanyi The Great Transformation , 1944 .

[12]  P. Kennedy,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Great Powers , 1966 .

[13]  Charles H. Davis,et al.  Mainstream and non mainstream scientific literature in four peripheral Asian scientific communities , 1989, Scientometrics.

[14]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[15]  Thomas Schøtt The world scientific community: Globality and globalisation , 1991 .

[16]  Jon Sigurdson Internationalising research and development in Japan , 1992 .

[17]  Thomas Schøtt,et al.  World Science: Globalization of Institutions and Participation , 1993 .

[18]  S. Dedijer Underdeveloped science in underdeveloped countries , 1963 .