Coupling high-resolution satellite imagery with ALS-based canopy height model and digital elevation model in object-based boreal forest habitat type classification

Abstract We developed a classification workflow for boreal forest habitat type mapping. In object-based image analysis framework, Fractal Net Evolution Approach segmentation was combined with random forest classification. High-resolution WorldView-2 imagery was coupled with ALS based canopy height model and digital terrain model. We calculated several features (e.g. spectral, textural and topographic) per image object from the used datasets. We tested different feature set alternatives; a classification accuracy of 78.0% was obtained when all features were used. The highest classification accuracy (79.1%) was obtained when the amount of features was reduced from the initial 328 to the 100 most important using Boruta feature selection algorithm and when ancillary soil and land-use GIS-datasets were used. Although Boruta could rank the importance of features, it could not separate unimportant features from the important ones. Classification accuracy was bit lower (78.7%) when the classification was performed separately on two areas: the areas above and below 1 m vertical distance from the nearest stream. The data split, however, improved the classification accuracy of mire habitat types and streamside habitats, probably because their proportion in the below 1 m data was higher than in the other datasets. It was found that several types of data are needed to get the highest classification accuracy whereas omitting some feature groups reduced the classification accuracy. A major habitat type in the study area was mesic forests in different successional stages. It was found that the inner heterogeneity of different mesic forest age groups was large and other habitat types were often inside this heterogeneity.

[1]  S. Franklin,et al.  Remote sensing for large-area habitat mapping , 2005 .

[2]  Daniel Clewley,et al.  Updating the Phase 1 habitat map of Wales, UK, using satellite sensor data , 2011 .

[3]  Dong-Chen He,et al.  Texture feature extraction , 1987, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[4]  Y. Ouma,et al.  Analysis of co‐occurrence and discrete wavelet transform textures for differentiation of forest and non‐forest vegetation in very‐high‐resolution optical‐sensor imagery , 2008 .

[5]  C. Wright,et al.  Improved wetland remote sensing in Yellowstone National Park using classification trees to combine TM imagery and ancillary environmental data , 2007 .

[6]  Jungho Im,et al.  Synergistic use of QuickBird multispectral imagery and LIDAR data for object-based forest species classification , 2010 .

[7]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[8]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment , 2008 .

[9]  N. Coops,et al.  Classification of late seral coastal temperate rainforests with high spatial resolution QuickBird imagery , 2008 .

[10]  Zhang Xiangmin,et al.  Comparison of pixel‐based and object‐oriented image classification approaches—a case study in a coal fire area, Wuda, Inner Mongolia, China , 2006 .

[11]  R. M. Wallace,et al.  Terrain Analysis Using Digital Elevation Models , 2001 .

[12]  M. Kuitunen,et al.  Ranking of habitats for the assessment of ecological impact in land use planning , 1996 .

[13]  hya sree.M,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing , 2015 .

[14]  Paul E. Gessler,et al.  The influence of conifer forest canopy cover on the accuracy of two individual tree measurement algorithms using lidar data , 2008 .

[15]  J. Böhner,et al.  Spatial Prediction of Soil Attributes Using Terrain Analysis and Climate Regionalisation , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .

[17]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Texture-based classification of sub-Antarctic vegetation communities on Heard Island , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[18]  Lei Deng,et al.  Analysis of wavelet packet and statistical textures for object-oriented classification of forest-agriculture ecotones using SPOT 5 imagery , 2012 .

[19]  P. Arp,et al.  Modelling and mapping topographic variations in forest soils at high resolution: A case study , 2011 .

[20]  Ke Wang,et al.  Integration of texture and landscape features into object-based classification for delineating Torreya using IKONOS imagery , 2012 .

[21]  Chao Chen,et al.  Using Random Forest to Learn Imbalanced Data , 2004 .

[22]  Marco A. Casanova,et al.  TerraLib: An Open Source GIS Library for Large-Scale Environmental and Socio-Economic Applications , 2008 .

[23]  Arivazhagan Selvaraj,et al.  Texture classification using wavelet transform , 2003, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[24]  Junichi Imanishi,et al.  Object-based classification of land cover and tree species by integrating airborne LiDAR and high spatial resolution imagery data , 2011, Landscape and Ecological Engineering.

[25]  Alex M. Lechner,et al.  Remote sensing of small and linear features: Quantifying the effects of patch size and length, grid position and detectability on land cover mapping , 2009 .

[26]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[27]  Timothy A. Warner,et al.  Forest Type Mapping using Object-specific Texture Measures from Multispectral Ikonos Imagery: Segmentation Quality and Image Classification Issues , 2009 .

[28]  Wolfgang Huber,et al.  EBImage—an R package for image processing with applications to cellular phenotypes , 2010, Bioinform..

[29]  Witold R. Rudnicki,et al.  Feature Selection with the Boruta Package , 2010 .

[30]  Paul Bolstad,et al.  Mapping northern wetlands with high resolution satellite images and LiDAR , 2009, Wetlands.

[31]  M. Bock,et al.  Object-oriented methods for habitat mapping at multiple scales – Case studies from Northern Germany and Wye Downs, UK , 2005 .

[32]  Jae Ogilvie,et al.  Topographic modelling of soil moisture conditions: a comparison and verification of two models , 2009 .

[33]  J. Brasington,et al.  Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[34]  P. Gessler,et al.  Wavelet estimation of plant spatial patterns in multitemporal aerial photography , 2005 .

[35]  John W. Sammon,et al.  A Nonlinear Mapping for Data Structure Analysis , 1969, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[36]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[37]  T. Ahti,et al.  Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe , 1968 .

[38]  S. Weiss,et al.  GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution , 1999, Plant Ecology.

[39]  Arno Schäpe,et al.  Multiresolution Segmentation : an optimization approach for high quality multi-scale image segmentation , 2000 .

[40]  E. Næsset,et al.  Prediction of species specific forest inventory attributes using a nonparametric semi-individual tree crown approach based on fused airborne laser scanning and multispectral data , 2010 .

[41]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Modeling species distribution with GIS , 2000 .

[42]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Aerial Photography: A Rapidly Evolving Tool for Ecological Management , 2010 .

[43]  N. Coops,et al.  Application of high spatial resolution satellite imagery for riparian and forest ecosystem classification , 2007 .

[44]  Stacy L. Ozesmi,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[45]  J. Gallant,et al.  A multiresolution index of valley bottom flatness for mapping depositional areas , 2003 .

[46]  J. Clevers,et al.  Classification of floodplain vegetation by data fusion of spectral (CASI) and LiDAR data , 2007 .

[47]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  Using coarse scale forest variables as ancillary information and weighting of variables in k-NN estimation: a genetic algorithm approach , 2004 .

[48]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  BMC Bioinformatics BioMed Central Methodology article Conditional variable importance for random forests , 2008 .

[49]  Achim Zeileis,et al.  Bias in random forest variable importance measures: Illustrations, sources and a solution , 2007, BMC Bioinformatics.

[50]  C. Muñoz Sobrino,et al.  Automatic habitat classification methods based on satellite images: A practical assessment in the NW Iberia coastal mountains , 2008, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[51]  Brian Brisco,et al.  The integration of optical, topographic, and radar data for wetland mapping in northern Minnesota , 2011 .

[52]  E. Tomppo,et al.  The Multi-Source National Forest Inventory of Finland – methods and results 2013 , 2012 .

[53]  P. Gong,et al.  Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery , 2006 .

[54]  S. Gergel,et al.  Quantifying historic landscape heterogeneity from aerial photographs using object-based analysis , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[55]  R. Pontius,et al.  Death to Kappa: birth of quantity disagreement and allocation disagreement for accuracy assessment , 2011 .

[56]  A. Smith,et al.  Image segmentation scale parameter optimization and land cover classification using the Random Forest algorithm , 2010 .

[57]  Zuyuan Wang,et al.  Forest delineation of aerial images with Gabor wavelets , 2012 .

[58]  C. McClean,et al.  An investigation of uncertainty in field habitat mapping and the implications for detecting land cover change , 1995, Landscape Ecology.

[59]  Steven E. Franklin,et al.  Multi-scale object-based image analysis and feature selection of multi-sensor earth observation imagery using random forests , 2012 .

[60]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Combining national forest inventory field plots and remote sensing data for forest databases , 2008 .

[61]  J. Kerr,et al.  From space to species: ecological applications for remote sensing , 2003 .

[62]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[63]  Ben Gorte,et al.  A method for object-oriented land cover classification combining Landsat TM data and aerial photographs , 2003 .

[64]  Jae Ogilvie,et al.  Mapping wetlands: A comparison of two different approaches for New Brunswick, Canada , 2007, Wetlands.

[65]  Mario Chica-Olmo,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of a random forest classifier for land-cover classification , 2012 .

[66]  Alexander Hapfelmeier,et al.  A new variable selection approach using Random Forests , 2013, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[67]  A. Cajander,et al.  Forest types and their significance. , 1949 .

[68]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[69]  W. Cohen,et al.  Lidar Remote Sensing for Ecosystem Studies , 2002 .

[70]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[71]  Markku Kuitunen,et al.  What makes segmentation good? A case study in boreal forest habitat mapping , 2013 .

[72]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[73]  Marie-Josée Fortin,et al.  Two-dimensional wavelet analysis of spruce budworm host basal area in the Border Lakes landscape. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[74]  M.,et al.  Statistical and Structural Approaches to Texture , 2022 .

[75]  Colin J. McClean,et al.  The reliability of ‘Phase 1’ habitat mapping in the UK: the extent and types of observer bias , 1999 .

[76]  T. Warner,et al.  Multi-scale GEOBIA with very high spatial resolution digital aerial imagery: scale, texture and image objects , 2011 .

[77]  Sarah E. Gergel,et al.  Conservation implications of mapping rare ecosystems using high spatial resolution imagery: recommendations for heterogeneous and fragmented landscapes , 2008, Landscape Ecology.

[78]  Stefan W. Maier,et al.  Comparing object-based and pixel-based classifications for mapping savannas , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[79]  Rick L. Lawrence,et al.  Mapping invasive plants using hyperspectral imagery and Breiman Cutler classifications (RandomForest) , 2006 .

[80]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[81]  G. W. Geerling,et al.  Mapping river floodplain ecotopes by segmentation of spectral (CASI) and structural (LiDAR) remote sensing data , 2009 .

[82]  S. Phinn,et al.  Integration of LiDAR and QuickBird imagery for mapping riparian biophysical parameters and land cover types in Australian tropical savannas , 2010 .

[83]  Yohay Carmel,et al.  Automated segmentation of vegetation structure units in a Mediterranean landscape , 2012 .