Teachers’ views on implementing storytelling as a way to motivate inquiry learning in high-school chemistry teaching

Educational research and policy suggest inquiry as one of the most prominent ways of promoting effective science education. However, traditional approaches towards inquiry learning are not always sufficiently motivating for all learners. The EU-funded project, TEMI – Teaching Enquiry with Mysteries Incorporated, suggests that mysterious scientific phenomena introduced via drama-based pedagogies and showmanship skills could have the potential to engage more students emotionally in science and to entice them to solve the mysteries through inquiry. This paper reports teachers’ views on using storytelling in connection with mysteries in the science classroom. The data stem from a case of chemistry teachers’ continuous professional development within the TEMI project in Israel. Data were collected from 14 teachers by means of a questionnaire, interviews, observations, and written reflection essays. The case discusses teachers’ views on the benefits and difficulties of using story-based science inquiry activities.

[1]  R. F. Kempa,et al.  Students’ motivational traits and preferences for different instructional modes in science education‐Part 2 , 1990 .

[2]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  Motivating strategies in science education: Attempt at an analysis , 1985 .

[3]  J. Bruner.  The Narrative Construction of Reality , 1991, Critical Inquiry.

[4]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[5]  Pamela Van Scotter,et al.  The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins, Effectiveness, and Applications , 2006 .

[6]  Rodger Bybee,et al.  Teaching Science as Inquiry. , 1999 .

[7]  M. Bradley,et al.  The neural basis of narrative imagery: emotion and action. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[8]  Jang-Long Lin,et al.  Learning Activities That Combine Science Magic Activities with the 5E Instructional Model to Influence Secondary-School Students' Attitudes to Science. , 2014 .

[9]  Erika A. Patall,et al.  The Effect of Drama-Based Pedagogy on PreK–16 Outcomes , 2015 .

[10]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development , 2006 .

[11]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving , 2002 .

[12]  Kirk Dorion.  Science through Drama: A multiple case exploration of the characteristics of drama activities used in secondary science lessons , 2009 .

[13]  Sibel Erduran,et al.  Promoting argumentation in the context of chemistry stories , 2015 .

[14]  Ian Abrahams,et al.  Practical Work in Secondary Science: A Minds-On Approach , 2011 .

[15]  R. J. A. Metcalfe,et al.  Teaching Science Through Drama: an empirical investigation , 1984 .

[16]  Martin Braund,et al.  Electric drama to improve understanding in science , 1999 .

[17]  Vincent N. Lunetta,et al.  The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century , 2004 .

[18]  Avi Hofstein,et al.  How to Motivate Students and Raise Their Interest in Chemistry Education , 2013 .

[19]  Marianne Ødegaard.  Dramatic Science. A Critical Review of Drama in Science Education , 2003 .

[20]  Bracha Arieli.  The integration of creative drama into science teaching , 2007 .

[21]  P. David Pearson,et al.  The instruction of reading comprehension , 1983 .