The sharp slowdown in growth of medical imaging: an early analysis suggests combination of policies was the cause.

The growth in the use of advanced imaging for Medicare beneficiaries decelerated in 2006 and 2007, ending a decade of growth that had exceeded 6 percent annually. The slowdown raises three questions. Did the slowdown in growth of imaging under Medicare persist and extend to the non-Medicare insured? What factors caused the slowdown? Was the slowdown good or bad for patients? Using claims file data and interviews with health care professionals, we found that the growth of imaging use among both Medicare beneficiaries and the non-Medicare insured slowed to 1-3 percent per year through 2009. One by-product of this deceleration in imaging growth was a weaker market for radiologists, who until recently could demand top salaries. The expansion of prior authorization, increased cost sharing, and other policies appear to have contributed to the slowdown. A meaningful fraction of the reduction in use involved imaging studies previously identified as having unproven medical value. What has occurred in the imaging field suggests incentive-based cost control measures can be a useful complement to comparative effectiveness research when a procedure's ultimate clinical benefit is uncertain.

[1]  J. Iglehart Health insurers and medical-imaging policy--a work in progress. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Jeffrey Jarvik,et al.  Diagnostic Evaluation of Low Back Pain with Emphasis on Imaging , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  J. Thrall Changing relationships between radiologists and hospitals. Part II. Contracts and resolution of issues. , 2008, Radiology.

[4]  Jean M. Mitchell,et al.  Controlling the Escalating Use of Advanced Imaging , 2009, Medical care research and review : MCRR.

[5]  Gary S Kaplan,et al.  Effectiveness of clinical decision support in controlling inappropriate imaging. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[6]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  David C. Levin,et al.  Physician orders contribute to high-tech imaging slowdown. , 2010, Health affairs.

[8]  James H Thrall,et al.  Effect of computerized order entry with integrated decision support on the growth of outpatient procedure volumes: seven-year time series analysis. , 2009, Radiology.

[9]  Thomas O. Staiger,et al.  Rapid magnetic resonance imaging vs radiographs for patients with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  F. Levy,et al.  Offshoring Professional Services: Institutions and Professional Control , 2010 .

[11]  E. J. Adam,et al.  Picture archiving and communication systems lead to sustained improvements in reporting times and productivity: results of a 5-year audit. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[12]  L. Solberg,et al.  Effects of electronic decision support on high-tech diagnostic imaging orders and patients. , 2010, The American journal of managed care.

[13]  D. Levin,et al.  Evolving roles of radiologists, nephrologists, and surgeons in endovascular hemodialysis access maintenance procedures. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[14]  J. Skinner,et al.  Technology Growth and Expenditure Growth in Health Care , 2011, National Bureau of Economic Research bulletin on aging and health.

[15]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Optimally Treated Stable Coronary Patients , 2008, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.