Voxel-based morphometry patterns of atrophy in FTLD with mutations in MAPT or PGRN

Objective: To compare patterns of gray matter loss in subjects with mutations in the progranulin (PGRN) gene to subjects with mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene. Methods: We identified all subjects seen at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, who had screened positive for mutations in PGRN or MAPT and had a head MRI. Twelve cases with mutations in the PGRN gene were matched by time from disease onset to scan to 12 subjects with mutations in the MAPT gene. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess patterns of gray matter loss in the PGRN and MAPT groups compared to a control cohort, and compared to each other. MAPT subjects were younger than the PGRN subjects; therefore, each group was also compared to a specific age-matched control group. Results: Both PGRN and MAPT groups showed gray matter loss in frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes compared to controls, although loss was predominantly identified in posterior temporal and parietal lobes in PGRN and anteromedial temporal lobes in MAPT. The MAPT group had greater loss compared to healthy subjects of the same age than the PGRN subjects when compared to healthy subjects of the same age. The MAPT subjects showed greater gray matter loss in the medial temporal lobes, insula, and putamen than the PGRN subjects. Conclusion: These results increase understanding of the biology of these disorders and suggest that patterns of atrophy on MRI may be useful to aid in the differentiation of groups of PGRN and MAPT mutation carriers.

[1]  C. Jack,et al.  Prominent phenotypic variability associated with mutations in Progranulin , 2009, Neurobiology of Aging.

[2]  Rohani Omar,et al.  Parietal lobe deficits in frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by a mutation in the progranulin gene. , 2008, Archives of neurology.

[3]  Pietro Pietrini,et al.  In vivo and Postmortem Clinicoanatomical Correlations in Frontotemporal Dementia and Parkinsonism Linked to Chromosome 17 , 2008, Neurodegenerative Diseases.

[4]  Julie S Snowden,et al.  Frequency and clinical characteristics of progranulin mutation carriers in the Manchester frontotemporal lobar degeneration cohort: comparison with patients with MAPT and no known mutations. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  Eric Guedj,et al.  Phenotype variability in progranulin mutation carriers: a clinical, neuropsychological, imaging and genetic study. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Andrew King,et al.  A distinct clinical, neuropsychological and radiological phenotype is associated with progranulin gene mutations in a large UK series. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[7]  C. Jack,et al.  β‐amyloid burden is not associated with rates of brain atrophy , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[8]  D. Kareken,et al.  The tauopathy associated with mutation +3 in intron 10 of Tau: characterization of the MSTD family , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[9]  J. Trojanowski,et al.  Clinical, genetic, and pathologic characteristics of patients with frontotemporal dementia and progranulin mutations. , 2007, Archives of neurology.

[10]  B. Boeve,et al.  Clinical-pathologic study of biomarkers in FTDP-17 (PPND family with N279K tau mutation). , 2007, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[11]  Clifford R Jack,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry in frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions with and without progranulin mutations. , 2007, Archives of neurology.

[12]  C. Jack,et al.  Distinctive MRI findings in pallidopontonigral degeneration (PPND) , 2007, Neurology.

[13]  R. Petersen,et al.  Neuropathologic Features of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration With Ubiquitin-Positive Inclusions With Progranulin Gene (PGRN) Mutations , 2007, Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology.

[14]  H. Feldman,et al.  The neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by mutations in the progranulin gene. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  D. Neary,et al.  Progranulin gene mutations associated with frontotemporal dementia and progressive non-fluent aphasia. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  S. Melquist,et al.  Mutations in progranulin are a major cause of ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal lobar degeneration. , 2006, Human molecular genetics.

[17]  C. Duijn,et al.  Null mutations in progranulin cause ubiquitin-positive frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17q21 , 2006, Nature.

[18]  S. Melquist,et al.  Mutations in progranulin cause tau-negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17 , 2006, Nature.

[19]  C. Jack,et al.  Patterns of atrophy in pathologically confirmed FTLD with and without motor neuron degeneration , 2006, Neurology.

[20]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging signatures of tissue pathology in frontotemporal dementia. , 2005, Archives of neurology.

[21]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Comparison of different methodological implementations of voxel-based morphometry in neurodegenerative disease , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  C. Broeckhoven,et al.  The role of tau (MAPT) in frontotemporal dementia and related tauopathies , 2004, Human mutation.

[23]  D. Mann,et al.  The neuropathology of frontotemporal lobar degeneration with respect to the cytological and biochemical characteristics of tau protein , 2004, Neuropathology and applied neurobiology.

[24]  P. Lantos,et al.  Neuropathologic variation in frontotemporal dementia due to the intronic tau 10+16 mutation , 2002, Neurology.

[25]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Dementia and neurodevelopmental predisposition: Cognitive dysfunction in presymptomatic subjects precedes dementia by decades in frontotemporal dementia , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[26]  M. Hutton Missense and splice site mutations in tau associated with FTDP-17: Multiple pathogenic mechanisms , 2001, Neurology.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods , 2000, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Faber,et al.  Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. , 1999, Neurology.

[29]  D. Geschwind,et al.  Inheritance of frontotemporal dementia. , 1999, Archives of neurology.

[30]  E. Tangalos,et al.  Mild Cognitive Impairment Clinical Characterization and Outcome , 1999 .

[31]  C. Duijn,et al.  High prevalence of mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau in a population study of frontotemporal dementia in the Netherlands. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[32]  Ronald C. Petersen,et al.  Association of missense and 5′-splice-site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP-17 , 1998, Nature.

[33]  B. Snow,et al.  Rapidly progressive autosomal dominant parkinsonism and dementia with pallido‐ponto‐nigral degeneration , 1992, Annals of neurology.

[34]  K P Offord,et al.  A short test of mental status: description and preliminary results. , 1987, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[35]  M. Folstein,et al.  Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease , 1984, Neurology.

[36]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia , 1982, Annals of neurology.

[37]  C. P. Hughes,et al.  A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia , 1982, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[38]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[39]  Irene Litvan,et al.  Corticobasal degeneration and its relationship to progressive supranuclear palsy and frontotemporal dementia , 2003, Annals of neurology.