Hot Spots in Chromosomal Breakage: From Description TC Etiology

The genome has evolved from a primitive state (Demongeot and Besson, 1996) to the present human genome organized along the 23 pairs of chromosomes. This evolution has been governed by the mutation process and also by the physiological (crossing-over mechanism) and pathological (translocations, inversions, insertions, deletions, fusions,…) re-organization of the genomic material within or between the chromosomes, which condition genomic variability. This re-organization starts at singular points on the short or long chromosomal arms, called crossing-over, translocation, insertion, …, breakpoints. First we will show that these points, also called weak (chromosomal break) points or hot spots of the genome are correlated, independently of their origin (physiological crossing-over, pathological constitutional or acquired chromosomal abnormal breakage). One of the mechanisms involved in the weakness of certain parts of the chromosomes is the presence of ubiquitous genes (expressed during the whole cell cycle) at methylated parts of the chromosome causing local decoiling and opening of the DNA double strand, hence causing a local fragility of the genome. In order to give arguments in favour of this hypothesis, we will construct partially random interaction matrices for the relationsamong the ubiquitous genes and we will calculate the attractor configurations of expression of these genes. Then we will be able to calculate the probability of expression and compare the location of the highly expressed parts to the weak genomic points. Finally, we will give some properties of the interaction matrices in terms of the number of possible attractors (generalizing some results of (1995); (1998); (1998); (1998) to the discrete case).

[1]  C. Berge Graphes et hypergraphes , 1970 .

[2]  J. Gouzé Positive and Negative Circuits in Dynamical Systems , 1998 .

[3]  Denis Thieffry,et al.  Formalisation of regulatory networks: a logical method and its automatization , 1993 .

[4]  R Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[5]  Eric Goles,et al.  Neural and automata networks , 1990 .

[6]  J Demongeot,et al.  [The genetic code and cyclic codes]. , 1996, Comptes rendus des seances de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[7]  M Kaufman,et al.  Positive feedback circuits and memory. , 2000, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[8]  El Houssine Snoussi Necessary Conditions for Multistationarity and Stable Periodicity , 1998 .

[9]  J. Demongeot Multistationarity and Cell Differentiation , 1998 .

[10]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  A network model of the coupling of ion channels with secondary messenger in cell signalling , 1992 .

[11]  Jacques Demongeot,et al.  Cartographic study: Breakpoints in 1574 families carrying human reciprocal translocations , 1996, Human Genetics.

[12]  Thomas Mestl,et al.  FEEDBACK LOOPS, STABILITY AND MULTISTATIONARITY IN DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[13]  E. Álvarez-Buylla,et al.  Dynamics of the genetic regulatory network for Arabidopsis thaliana flower morphogenesis. , 1998, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  El Houssine Snoussi,et al.  Logical identification of all steady states: The concept of feedback loop characteristic states , 1993 .

[15]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  ORIGINS OF ORDER , 2019, Origins of Order.