Predictors of Graft Failure After Primary Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background: The tibiofemoral rotation angle has been found to be higher in patients with recurrent patellar dislocations (RPDs) than in healthy people; however, little is known about the clinical significance of this finding. Purpose: To determine whether an increased tibiofemoral rotation angle is associated with graft failure after primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) and to investigate the role of the tibiofemoral rotation angle in predicting MPFL-R failure in patients with RPDs. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of 632 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed RPDs from 2011 to 2018. Postoperative stress radiography of the patellofemoral joint was performed to identify whether the graft failed. After a review, 33 patients who showed MPFL-R failure were allocated to the failure group. They were matched 1:2 to 66 participants who underwent successful MPFL-R (control group). The cutoff value and area under the curve (AUC) of the tibiofemoral rotation angle for predicting graft failure after primary MPFL-R were determined, and the risk factors for MPFL-R failure were assessed by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: The tibiofemoral rotation angle was significantly higher in the failure group than in the control group (16.4° ± 5.6° vs 6.4° ± 4.5°, respectively; P < .001). The cutoff value of the tibiofemoral rotation angle for predicting graft failure was 12.3° (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 89.4%; AUC, 0.920). Overall, 3 risk factors for MPFL-R failure were determined: excessive tibiofemoral rotation (≥12.3°) (odds ratio [OR], 13.159 [95% CI, 2.469-70.139]; P = .003), a preoperative high-grade J-sign (OR, 7.674 [95% CI, 1.232-47.809]; P = .029), and a femoral tunnel malposition (OR, 6.976 [95% CI, 1.077-45.187]; P = .042). Conclusion: In this study, excessive tibiofemoral rotation, a preoperative high-grade J-sign, and a femoral tunnel malposition were identified as risk factors for graft failure after primary MPFL-R in patients with RPDs. More importantly, excessive tibiofemoral rotation ( ≥ 12.3°) may predict the failure of primary MPFL-R, which can help surgeons easily identify high-risk patients of MPFL-R failure before surgery.

[1]  D. Green,et al.  Increased tibiofemoral rotation on MRI with increasing clinical severity of patellar instability , 2021, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[2]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With or Without Derotational Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Treating Recurrent Patellar Dislocation With Increased Femoral Anteversion: A Retrospective Comparative Study , 2020, The American journal of sports medicine.

[3]  P. Balcarek,et al.  Patient-Reported Outcomes After Revision Surgery for Failed Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis Including Correction of Predisposing Factors , 2020, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  Fei Wang,et al.  Femoral derotation osteotomy for recurrent patellar dislocation , 2020, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[5]  Hui Zhang,et al.  The presence of a preoperative high-grade J-sign and femoral tunnel malposition are associated with residual graft laxity after MPFL reconstruction , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[6]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Increased femoral anteversion is associated with inferior clinical outcomes after MPFL reconstruction and combined tibial tubercle osteotomy for the treatment of recurrent patellar instability , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  Jin Zhang,et al.  A High-Grade J Sign Is More Likely to Yield Higher Postoperative Patellar Laxity and Residual Maltracking in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Dislocation Treated With Derotational Distal Femoral Osteotomy , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.

[8]  Hui Zhang,et al.  A pre-operative grade 3 J-sign adversely affects short-term clinical outcome and is more likely to yield MPFL residual graft laxity in recurrent patellar dislocation , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  R. Attal,et al.  Derotational femoral osteotomy changes patella tilt, patella engagement and tibial tuberosity trochlear groove distance , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  P. O'loughlin,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Failure With Isolated MPFL Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability: A Series of 211 Reconstructions With a Minimum Follow-up of 3 Years , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.

[11]  P. Balcarek,et al.  Geometry of Torsional Malalignment Syndrome: Trochlear Dysplasia but Not Torsion Predicts Lateral Patellar Instability , 2019, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[12]  R. Abdalla,et al.  Anteromedial Tibial Tubercle Osteotomy Improves Results of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability in Patients With Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance of 17 to 20 mm. , 2019, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[13]  K. Beitzel,et al.  Derotational osteotomy at the distal femur is effective to treat patients with patellar instability , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[14]  K. Frosch,et al.  Clinical Results after Combined Distal Femoral Osteotomy in Patients with Patellar Maltracking and Recurrent Dislocations , 2018, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[15]  R. Attal,et al.  Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patella instability is insufficient for higher degrees of internal femoral torsion , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[16]  S. Ikegami,et al.  Lateralization of the Tibial Tubercle in Recurrent Patellar Dislocation: Verification Using Multiple Methods to Evaluate the Tibial Tubercle , 2018, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  Takashi Sato,et al.  Alignment in the transverse plane, but not sagittal or coronal plane, affects the risk of recurrent patella dislocation , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  J. Elias,et al.  Variations in Tibial Tuberosity to Trochlear Groove and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distances due to Tibial External and Valgus Rotations , 2017, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[19]  S. Horibe,et al.  3D Computed Tomography Evaluation of Morphological Changes in the Femoral Tunnel After Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Graft for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[20]  C. Franciozi,et al.  Increased Femoral Anteversion Influence Over Surgically Treated Recurrent Patellar Instability Patients. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  S. Ikegami,et al.  What Components Comprise the Measurement of the Tibial Tuberosity-Trochlear Groove Distance in a Patellar Dislocation Population? , 2015, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. Dreyhaupt,et al.  Combined supracondylar femoral derotation osteotomy and patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellar dislocation and severe femoral anteversion syndrome: surgical technique and clinical outcome , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[23]  Adnan Saithna,et al.  Defining the Role of the Tibial Tubercle–Trochlear Groove and Tibial Tubercle–Posterior Cruciate Ligament Distances in the Work-up of Patients With Patellofemoral Disorders , 2015, The American journal of sports medicine.

[24]  D. Astur,et al.  Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Dovepress Use of Computed Tomography to Determine the Risk of Patellar Dislocation in 921 Patients with Patellar Instability , 2022 .

[25]  G. Maderbacher,et al.  Significant influence of rotational limb alignment parameters on patellar kinematics: an in vitro study , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[26]  H. Reichel,et al.  Analysis of failure and clinical outcome after unsuccessful medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in young patients , 2014, International Orthopaedics.

[27]  Christopher L. Camp,et al.  CT and MRI Measurements of Tibial Tubercle–Trochlear Groove Distances Are Not Equivalent in Patients With Patellar Instability , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[28]  M. Heller,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Rotational Alignment in Patients With Patellar Dislocations , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[29]  D. Flanigan,et al.  A Systematic Review of Complications and Failures Associated With Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation , 2012, The American journal of sports medicine.

[30]  P. Neyret,et al.  In Vivo Positioning Analysis of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[31]  D. Dejour,et al.  Osteotomies in Patello-Femoral Instabilities , 2007, Sports medicine and arthroscopy review.

[32]  R. Teitge Osteotomy in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability , 2006 .

[33]  S. Seber,et al.  Rotational profile of the lower extremity and foot progression angle: computerized tomographic examination of 50 male adults , 2000, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[34]  M. J. Burgess-Milliron,et al.  A simplified technique for determining foot progression angle in children 4 to 16 years of age. , 1996, Journal of pediatric orthopedics.

[35]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.