Influence of anode potentials on selection of Geobacter strains in microbial electrolysis cells.

Through their ability to directly transfer electrons to electrodes, Geobacter sp. are key organisms for microbial fuel cell technology. This study presents a simple method to reproducibly select Geobacter-dominated anode biofilms from a mixed inoculum of bacteria using graphite electrodes initially poised at -0.25, -0.36 and -0.42 V vs. Ag/AgCl. The biofilms all produced maximum power density of approximately 270 m Wm(-2) (projected anode surface area). Analysis of 16S rRNA genes and intergenic spacer (ITS) sequences found that the biofilm communities were all dominated by bacteria closely related to Geobacter psychrophilus. Anodes initially poised at -0.25 V reproducibly selected biofilms that were dominated by a strain of G. psychrophilus that was genetically distinct from the strain that dominated the -0.36 and -0.42 V biofilms. This work demonstrates for the first time that closely related strains of Geobacter can have very different competitive advantages at different anode potentials.

[1]  Kyu-Jung Chae,et al.  Methanogenesis control by employing various environmental stress conditions in two-chambered microbial fuel cells. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[2]  D. R. Bond,et al.  Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  B. Logan,et al.  Set potential regulation reveals additional oxidation peaks of Geobacter sulfurreducens anodic biofilms , 2012 .

[4]  B. Logan.  Exoelectrogenic bacteria that power microbial fuel cells , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[5]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  A method for high throughput bioelectrochemical research based on small scale microbial electrolysis cells. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[6]  John M. Regan,et al.  Influence of External Resistance on Electrogenesis, Methanogenesis, and Anode Prokaryotic Communities in Microbial Fuel Cells , 2010, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[7]  Masaharu Ishii,et al.  Dynamic Transition of a Methanogenic Population in Response to the Concentration of Volatile Fatty Acids in a Thermophilic Anaerobic Digester , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[8]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  The anode potential regulates bacterial activity in microbial fuel cells , 2008, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  A. Morán,et al.  Performance of a continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) fed with domestic wastewater. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Spatial and temporal heterogeneity of the bacterial communities in stream epilithic biofilms. , 2008, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[11]  Leonard M Tender,et al.  Effect of electrode potential on electrode-reducing microbiota. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  J. Thioulouse,et al.  Characterization of Bacterial and Fungal Soil Communities by Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis Fingerprints: Biological and Methodological Variability , 2001, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Peng Liang,et al.  A new insight into potential regulation on growth and power generation of Geobacter sulfurreducens in microbial fuel cells based on energy viewpoint. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Byoung-Chan Kim,et al.  Selection of a variant of Geobacter sulfurreducens with enhanced capacity for current production in microbial fuel cells. , 2009, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[15]  Qingliang Zhao,et al.  Accelerated start-up of two-chambered microbial fuel cells: Effect of anodic positive poised potential , 2009 .

[16]  D. Leech,et al.  Geobacter sulfurreducens biofilms developed under different growth conditions on glassy carbon electrodes: insights using cyclic voltammetry. , 2010, Chemical Communications.

[17]  A. Estéve-Núñez,et al.  Whole cell electrochemistry of electricity-producing microorganisms evidence an adaptation for optimal exocellular electron transport. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  B. Logan,et al.  Optimal set anode potentials vary in bioelectrochemical systems. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[20]  Uwe Schröder,et al.  On the use of cyclic voltammetry for the study of anodic electron transfer in microbial fuel cells , 2008 .

[21]  F. Harnisch,et al.  Improvement of the anodic bioelectrocatalytic activity of mixed culture biofilms by a simple consecutive electrochemical selection procedure. , 2008, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[22]  Prathap Parameswaran,et al.  Selecting anode-respiring bacteria based on anode potential: phylogenetic, electrochemical, and microscopic characterization. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  R. Rosenzweig,et al.  Diversity of geobacteraceae species inhabiting metal-polluted freshwater lake sediments ascertained by 16S rDNA analyses , 2003, Microbial Ecology.

[24]  Yujie Feng,et al.  Effect of nitrogen addition on the performance of microbial fuel cell anodes. , 2011, Bioresource technology.