Multivariate Process Variability Monitoring Through Projection

Inspired by the recently developed projection chart, such as the U2 chart for monitoring a shift in the multivariate mean, this article proposes a multivariate projection chart for monitoring process variability. In engineering practice, people often build a linear process model to connect the multivariate quality measurements with a set of fixed assignable causes. The column space of the process model naturally provides a subspace for projection and subsequent monitoring and was indeed used as the projection subspace in the recently developed projection control charts for monitoring a shift the mean. For the purpose of monitoring variability, however, we will show that such a projection may not be advantageous. We propose an alternative projecting statistic, labeled as VS, to be used for constructing a multivariate variability monitoring chart. We show, through extensive numerical studies, that the VS chart entertains several advantages over other competing methods, such as its less restrictive requirements on the process model and generally improved detection performance.

[1]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Modeling and controlling variation propagation in mechanical assemblies using state transition models , 1999, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[2]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Research Issues and Ideas in Statistical Process Control , 1999 .

[3]  Jionghua Jin,et al.  State Space Modeling of Sheet Metal Assembly for Dimensional Control , 1999 .

[4]  Y. Fujikoshi Asymptotic expansions of the distributions of test statistics in multivariate analysis , 1970 .

[5]  Darek Ceglarek,et al.  Fixture Failure Diagnosis for Autobody Assembly Using Pattern Recognition , 1996 .

[6]  Jianjun Shi,et al.  Stream of Variation Modeling and Diagnosis of Multi-Station Machining Processes , 2000, Manufacturing Engineering.

[7]  Maman A. Djauhari,et al.  Improved Monitoring of Multivariate Process Variability , 2005 .

[8]  Dariusz Ceglarek,et al.  Diagnosability Analysis of Multi-Station Manufacturing Processes , 2002 .

[9]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  Optimal Monitoring of Multivariate Data for Fault Patterns , 2007 .

[10]  Yong Chen,et al.  Diagnosability Study of Multistage Manufacturing Processes Based on Linear Mixed-Effects Models , 2003, Technometrics.

[11]  Shiyu Zhou,et al.  Cycle-based signal monitoring using a directionally variant multivariate control chart system , 2005 .

[12]  Yu Ding,et al.  Diagnosability Analysis of Multi-Station Manufacturing Processes , 2002 .

[13]  Daniel W. Apley,et al.  A Factor-Analysis Method for Diagnosing Variability in Mulitvariate Manufacturing Processes , 2001, Technometrics.

[14]  George C. Runger,et al.  Projections and the U(2) Multivariate Control Chart , 1996 .

[15]  Yu Ding,et al.  A characterization of diagnosability conditions for variance components analysis in assembly operations , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[16]  Gyo-Young Cho,et al.  Multivariate Control Charts for Monitoring the Mean Vector and Covariance Matrix , 2006 .

[17]  Russell R. Barton,et al.  PROCESS-ORIENTED BASIS REPRESENTATIONS FOR MLTLTIVARIATE PROCESS DIAGNOSTICS , 1996 .

[18]  H. Hotelling,et al.  Multivariate Quality Control , 1947 .

[19]  Qiang Huang,et al.  State space modeling of dimensional variation propagation in multistage machining process using differential motion vectors , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[20]  Andreas Karlsson,et al.  Matrix Analysis for Statistics , 2007, Technometrics.

[21]  Yu Ding,et al.  A comparison of process variation estimators for in-process dimensional measurements and control , 2005 .

[22]  Yu Ding,et al.  MODELING AND DIAGNOSIS OF MULTISTAGE MANUFACTURING PROCESSES: PART I - STATE SPACE MODEL , 2000 .