Driving sustainable innovation through procurement of complex products and systems in construction

This paper will explore how procurement of complex products and systems by the demand side may drive sustainable innovation in the construction business system. In recent years, (public) procurement of complex products and systems has increasingly been advocated as a complementary yet powerful strategy to drive innovation for sustainable construction. Such a demand-oriented innovation strategy has been pushed not only by national agencies, but also by international bodies like the United Nations and notably by the European Commission through its Lead Market Initiative. Based on an on-going case study of procuring a complex construction project, this paper emphasize the complex and emergent character of the demand side in construction and argues for a stronger analytical sensitivity towards the various actors and activities on the demand side of construction. Further, this paper makes a preliminary investigation of the various types of constituents of construction. In particular, this paper argues for a distinction between building owners and users in an analytical model of innovation in complex products and systems like construction. Finally, this paper argues that procurement of complex products and systems may reshape the linkages between the various constituents of construction through policy processes, business processes, and learning processes, and the paper hypothesises on the dominant character of these linkages.

[1]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Clients driving construction innovation : moving ideas to practice , 2006 .

[2]  Michael Hobday,et al.  Innovation in complex products and system , 2000 .

[3]  M. Hobday Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation , 1998 .

[4]  A. Manseau,et al.  Innovation in Construction: An International Review of Public Policies , 2003 .

[5]  K. Weick,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization , 1990 .

[6]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  D. Gann,et al.  Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: the construction of complex products and systems , 2000 .

[8]  Sylwia Męcfal Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[9]  Stephen Pryke,et al.  Analysing construction project coalitions: exploring the application of social network analysis , 2004 .

[10]  Marianne Forman,et al.  Coupling project and business processes: exemplified by defects and arbitration , 2011 .

[11]  Lars-Erik Gadde,et al.  The construction industry as a loosely coupled system: implications for productivity and innovation , 2002 .

[12]  M. W. Shields,et al.  Loosely Coupled Systems , 1997 .

[13]  Keith D. Hampson,et al.  Clients driving construction innovation: Mapping the terrain , 2005 .

[14]  Paul Chinowsky,et al.  Social Network Model of Construction , 2008 .

[15]  M. Hobday The Project-Based Organisation: An ideal form for managing complex products and systems? , 2000 .

[16]  Jean Carassus The Construction Sector System Approach: An International Framework Report by CIB W055-W065 "Construction Industry Comparative Analysis" Project Group , 2004 .