Autoregulation at the level of mRNA 3' end formation of the suppressor of forked gene of Drosophila melanogaster is conserved in Drosophila virilis.

The Drosophila melanogaster Suppressor of forked [Su(f)] protein shares homology with the yeast RNA14 protein and the 77-kDa subunit of human cleavage stimulation factor, which are proteins involved in mRNA 3' end formation. This suggests a role for Su(f) in mRNA 3' end formation in Drosophila. The su(f) gene produces three transcripts; two of them are polyadenylated at the end of the transcription unit, and one is a truncated transcript, polyadenylated in intron 4. Using temperature-sensitive su(f) mutants, we show that accumulation of the truncated transcript requires wild-type Su(f) protein. This suggests that the Su(f) protein autoregulates negatively its accumulation by stimulating 3' end formation of the truncated su(f) RNA. Cloning of su(f) from Drosophila virilis and analysis of its RNA profile suggest that su(f) autoregulation is conserved in this species. Sequence comparison between su(f) from both species allows us to point out three conserved regions in intron 4 downstream of the truncated RNA poly(A) site. These conserved regions include the GU-rich downstream sequence involved in poly(A) site definition. Using transgenes truncated within intron 4, we show that sequence up to the conserved GU-rich domain is sufficient for production of the truncated RNA and for regulation of this production by su(f). Our results indicate a role of su(f) in the regulation of poly(A) site utilization and an important role of the GU-rich sequence for this regulation to occur.

[1]  M. Simonelig,et al.  The suppressor of forked protein of Drosophila, a homologue of the human 77K protein required for mRNA 3′-end formation, accumulates in mitotically-active cells , 1998, Mechanisms of Development.

[2]  J. Manley,et al.  Mechanism and regulation of mRNA polyadenylation. , 1997, Genes & development.

[3]  T. Dandekar,et al.  RNA Ligands Selected by Cleavage Stimulation Factor Contain Distinct Sequence Motifs That Function as Downstream Elements in 3′-End Processing of Pre-mRNA* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  J. Manley,et al.  RNA recognition by the human polyadenylation factor CstF , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[5]  L. Minvielle-Sebastia,et al.  A comparison of mammalian and yeast pre-mRNA 3'-end processing. , 1997, Current opinion in cell biology.

[6]  K. O'hare,et al.  A 1.5 kb repeat sequence flanks the suppressor of forked gene at the euchromatin-heterochromatin boundary of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. , 1996, Genetical research.

[7]  J. Manley,et al.  The Polyadenylation Factor CstF-64 Regulates Alternative Processing of IgM Heavy Chain Pre-mRNA during B Cell Differentiation , 1996, Cell.

[8]  K. O'hare,et al.  Interallelic complementation at the suppressor of forked locus of Drosophila reveals complementation between suppressor of forked proteins mutated in different regions. , 1996, Genetics.

[9]  K. Murthy,et al.  The 160-kD subunit of human cleavage-polyadenylation specificity factor coordinates pre-mRNA 3'-end formation. , 1995, Genes & development.

[10]  G. Edwalds-Gilbert,et al.  Regulation of poly(A) site use during mouse B-cell development involves a change in the binding of a general polyadenylation factor in a B-cell stage-specific manner , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  K. O'hare mRNA 3' ends in focus. , 1995, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  W. Keller,et al.  No end yet to messenger RNA 3′ processing! , 1995, Cell.

[13]  L. Minvielle-Sebastia,et al.  RNA14 and RNA15 proteins as components of a yeast pre-mRNA 3'-end processing factor. , 1994, Science.

[14]  J. Manley,et al.  A polyadenylation factor subunit is the human homologue of theDrosophila suppressor of forked protein , 1994, Nature.

[15]  T. Shenk,et al.  The 64-kilodalton subunit of the CstF polyadenylation factor binds to pre-mRNAs downstream of the cleavage site and influences cleavage site location , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[16]  D. Weil,et al.  In vivo cooperation between introns during pre-mRNA processing. , 1993, Genes & development.

[17]  J. Nevins,et al.  Alternative poly(A) site utilization during adenovirus infection coincides with a decrease in the activity of a poly(A) site processing factor , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[18]  K. O'hare,et al.  Homology with Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNA14 suggests that phenotypic suppression in Drosophila melanogaster by suppressor of forked occurs at the level of RNA stability. , 1993, Genes & development.

[19]  D. Lindsley,et al.  The Genome of Drosophila Melanogaster , 1992 .

[20]  G. Christofori,et al.  Cleavage and polyadenylation factor CPF specifically interacts with the pre‐mRNA 3′ processing signal AAUAAA. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[21]  J. Nevins,et al.  Poly(A) site efficiency reflects the stability of complex formation involving the downstream element. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[22]  J. Manley,et al.  A multisubunit factor, CstF, is required for polyadenylation of mammalian pre-mRNAs. , 1990, Genes & development.

[23]  M Meselson,et al.  Interspecific nucleotide sequence comparisons used to identify regulatory and structural features of the Drosophila hsp82 gene. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[24]  J. McLauchlan,et al.  The consensus sequence YGTGTTYY located downstream from the AATAAA signal is required for efficient formation of mRNA 3' termini. , 1985, Nucleic acids research.

[25]  G. Rubin,et al.  Genetic transformation of Drosophila with transposable element vectors. , 1982, Science.