Modulation format identification assisted by sparse-fast-Fourier-transform for hitless flexible coherent transceivers.

For hitless flexible coherent transceivers based next-generation agile optical network, efficient modulation format identification (MFI) is an essential element in digital signal processing (DSP) flow at the receiver-side (Rx). In this paper, we propose a blind and fast MFI scheme with high identification accuracy at low optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR) regime. This is achieved by first raising the signal to the 4th power and calculate the peak-to-average power ratio (PAPR) of the corresponding spectra to distinguish 32 quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) from quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), 16 and 64QAM signals. Then, followed by iterative partition schemes to remove signals with phase ±π4,±3π4 (or QPSK-like phases) based on the signal amplitudes, the PAPR of the remaining signals is calculated to distinguish the other three formats. Additionally, by frequency offset (FO) pre-compensation, the spectrum can be obtained using sparse-fast-Fourier-transform (S-FFT), which greatly reduces the total complexity. The MFI performance is numerically and experimentally investigated by 28 Gbaud dual-polarization (DP) coherent optical back-to-back (B2B) and up to 1500 km standard single mode fiber (SSMF) transmission system using QPSK, 16QAM, 32QAM, and 64QAM. Results show that high identification accuracy can be achieved, even when OSNR is lower than that required for the 20% forward error correction (FEC) threshold of BER=2×10-2 for each format. Furthermore, fast format switching between 64QAM-32QAM and 32QAM-16QAM are demonstrated experimentally for B2B scenario and 900 km SSMF with the proposed MFI technique, respectively.

[1]  M. Tornatore,et al.  Optical Network Design With Mixed Line Rates and Multiple Modulation Formats , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[2]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Clustering algorithms for Stokes space modulation format recognition. , 2015, Optics express.

[3]  Darli A. A. Mello,et al.  Hitless Rate Switching for Dynamically Reconfigurable Optical Systems , 2015, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[4]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Simple and practical algorithm for sparse Fourier transform , 2012, SODA.

[5]  Roberto Proietti,et al.  Blind modulation format identification using nonlinear power transformation. , 2017, Optics express.

[6]  Ming Tang,et al.  Feed-forward frequency offset estimation for 32-QAM optical coherent detection. , 2017, Optics express.

[7]  Idelfonso Tafur Monroy,et al.  Stokes Space-Based Optical Modulation Format Recognition for Digital Coherent Receivers , 2013, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[8]  Tianwai Bo,et al.  Modulation Format Recognition for Optical Signals Using Connected Component Analysis , 2017, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[9]  Ming Tang,et al.  Modulation format identification aided hitless flexible coherent transceiver. , 2016, Optics express.

[10]  Ming Tang,et al.  Joint carrier phase and frequency-offset estimation with parallel implementation for dual-polarization coherent receiver. , 2017, Optics express.

[11]  Chao Lu,et al.  Signal power distribution based modulation format identification for coherent optical receivers , 2017 .

[12]  William Shieh,et al.  Flexible Optical Networks: An Energy Efficiency Perspective , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[13]  Ming Tang,et al.  RF-pilot aided modulation format identification for hitless coherent transceiver. , 2017, Optics express.

[14]  Ioannis Tomkos,et al.  A tutorial on the flexible optical networking paradigm: State of the art, trends, and research challenges , 2014, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[15]  Chao Lu,et al.  Modulation Format Identification in Coherent Receivers Using Deep Machine Learning , 2016, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.