Visualizing style differences through 3D animation

ABSTRACT Style is a ubiquitous aspect of the design of both graphical and physical objects, usually more readily demonstrated by presenting an example of the style than by describing the style in words. What constitutes a specific style is often implicit and indicated by a reference example. The explicit description of such styles, e.g., to define a given style, usually involves static illustrations of exemplars and a written guide to the interpretation of its salient stylistic features. The formal comparison of styles conventionally involves presentation of exemplars, and a comparative description of their stylistic differences, often using a specialized vocabulary. Rather than words and labels to direct attention to stylistic features, one can take advantage of an innate property of the human visual system to detect differences through motion. By modeling sculptures of different styles as variations on a common shape, blend animation allows one style to change smoothly into another by interpolation. The viewer can now appreciate style differences, not by shifting gaze from one to another, but by watching one become another, wherein their differences attract visual attention. The dynamic visualization of stylistic change can thus help illustrate styles change, and in general, offers new animation tools.

[1]  Frederick I. Parke,et al.  Computer generated animation of faces , 1972, ACM Annual Conference.

[2]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[3]  Sawitree Wisetchat Description-based visualisation of ethnic facial types , 2018 .

[4]  Richard E. Parent,et al.  Computer animation - algorithms and techniques , 2012 .

[5]  Thomas Ertl,et al.  Computer Graphics - Principles and Practice, 3rd Edition , 2014 .

[6]  Rob Carter,et al.  Typographic Design: Form and Communication , 1985 .

[7]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[8]  B. Marwick A cladistic evaluation of ancient Thai bronze Buddha images: six tests for a phylogenetic signal in the Griswold collection , 2012 .

[9]  S. Vadlamani On the Diffusion of Shape , 2007 .

[10]  John P. Lewis,et al.  Reducing blendshape interference by selected motion attenuation , 2005, I3D '05.

[11]  Zhigang Deng,et al.  Computer Facial Animation: A Survey , 2008 .

[12]  Priyanka Ashok Shisode Computer animation , 2015 .

[13]  Walter Tracy,et al.  Letters of Credit: A View of Type Design , 1986 .

[14]  Christian Peter Klingenberg,et al.  Visualizations in geometric morphometrics: How to read and how to make graphs showing shape changes , 2013 .

[15]  E. Catmull,et al.  Recursively generated B-spline surfaces on arbitrary topological meshes , 1978 .

[16]  Daniel Livingstone,et al.  Exploring How Faces Reveal Our Ethnicity , 2018 .

[17]  R J Winder,et al.  Technical validation of the Di3D stereophotogrammetry surface imaging system. , 2008, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[18]  D. W. Thompson On Growth and Form: The Complete Revised Edition , 1992 .

[19]  Sawitree Wisetchat Visualizing the Evolution of the Sukhothai Buddha , 2013 .

[20]  W. PEDDIE,et al.  Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1926, Nature.

[21]  H. Helmholtz Helmholtz's Treatise on Physiological Optics , 1963 .

[22]  Lisa Dresner Art In Thailand A Brief History , 2016 .

[23]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? , 2011 .

[24]  F. Brinkman,et al.  Phylogenetic analysis. , 1998, Methods of biochemical analysis.

[25]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  The Truss: Body Form Reconstructions in Morphometrics , 1982 .

[26]  Hanne Pedersen,et al.  Learning with animation , 2011 .

[27]  R. E. Fisher Buddhist Art and Architecture , 1993 .