An artificial early visual model adopting spike-timing-dependent plasticity

In this paper we present a biologically inspired, monocular vision network based on leaky integrate-and-fire (I&F) neurons. In the model, edges in an optical flow field are recorded by photoreceptors in the input layer. The edge-induced visual signals then stimulate the corresponding I&F neurons in the following processing layer. The motion of edges in the optical flow field can thus be transformed into the propagation of spikes between pulse-coupled neurons. The time-of-travel of an edge between two neurons is encoded with the output spike of the source neuron, which determines the decay rate of the dynamic threshold of the target neuron for input coincidence detection. It is shown that, besides detecting edges, this novel vision model is able to reconstruct the edge-associated three-dimensional depth from a two-dimensional image sequence. Meanwhile, spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity (STDP) is employed to adapt synaptic weights for rejecting spurious edge propagation. Due to the effective very large-scale-integrated (VLSI) circuit realisation of the I&F neuron, the model is amenable to compact hardware implementation.

[1]  Wulfram Gerstner.  Populations of spiking neurons , 1999 .

[2]  J. Horton,et al.  The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex. A revision of the classic Holmes map. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  K. Miller,et al.  Integrate-and-fire neurons matched to physiological F-1 curves yield high input sensitivity and wide dynamic range , 1997 .

[4]  D H Perkel,et al.  A computer program for simulating a network of interacting neurons. I. Organization and physiological assumptions. , 1976, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[5]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic Modifications in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons: Dependence on Spike Timing, Synaptic Strength, and Postsynaptic Cell Type , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Mark C. W. van Rossum,et al.  Stable Hebbian Learning from Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Peter Dayan,et al.  Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems , 2001 .

[8]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Christopher J. Bishop,et al.  Pulsed Neural Networks , 1998 .

[10]  Haim Sompolinsky,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF NEURAL NETWORKS , 1988 .

[11]  James M. Bower,et al.  Computational Neuroscience: Trends in Research , 1996 .

[12]  Florentin Wörgötter,et al.  A Parallel Noise-Robust Algorithm to Recover Depth Information from Radial Flow Fields , 1999, Neural Computation.

[13]  L. Abbott,et al.  Model neurons: From Hodgkin-Huxley to hopfield , 1990 .

[14]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  Patrick D. Roberts,et al.  Spike timing dependent synaptic plasticity in biological systems , 2002, Biological Cybernetics.

[16]  R. Kempter,et al.  Hebbian learning and spiking neurons , 1999 .

[17]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike Timing-Dependent Plasticity of Neural Circuits , 2004, Neuron.

[18]  Roman Borisyuk,et al.  Oscillatory activity in the neural networks of spiking elements. , 2002, Bio Systems.

[19]  Li I. Zhang,et al.  A critical window for cooperation and competition among developing retinotectal synapses , 1998, Nature.

[20]  H. Markram,et al.  Regulation of Synaptic Efficacy by Coincidence of Postsynaptic APs and EPSPs , 1997, Science.