Are static fetal growth charts still suitable for diagnostic purposes?

Fetal growth curves and the corresponding interpretation of biometric data represent an essential diagnostic tool in clinical practice and for epidemiological studies, but their validity is questioned by the population-reshuffling phenomenon and by other factors. To restore their diagnostic effectiveness, a suitable interpretative model has to be developed based on new parameters and on a global approach for data collection. To achieve this goal we studied the combined adoption of multidimensional analysis and of cloud-based data-harvesting techniques to produce customized curves more suitable for diagnostic purposes. In particular, multidimensional analysis allows to identify and to avoid more effectively false positives and/or false negatives while the use of cloud allows collecting and processing data on a global scale. The feasibility of the proposed approach is discussed referring to a prototype and a test on the field on a small scale.

[1]  T. Kiserud,et al.  P14.12: Longitudinal reference charts for growth of the fetal head, abdomen and femur , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  Giorgia Buscicchio,et al.  Reference interval for fetal biometry in Italian population. , 2009, Journal of prenatal medicine.

[3]  M M Alshimmiri,et al.  Ethnic variations in birthweight percentiles in Kuwait. , 2003, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[4]  Panos Vassiliadis,et al.  Gulliver in the land of data warehousing: practical experiences and observations of a researcher , 2000, DMDW.

[5]  F. McLean,et al.  Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. , 1969, The Journal of pediatrics.

[6]  Philip Owen,et al.  Fetal growth velocity in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation in a low risk population , 1998, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  R Favre,et al.  Use of Z‐scores to select a fetal biometric reference curve , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[8]  Torben Bach Pedersen,et al.  Incomplete Information in Multidimensional Databases , 2003, Multidimensional Databases.

[9]  I Buvat,et al.  The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry , 2005, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[10]  D. Bruzzese,et al.  Fetal size charts for the Italian population. Normative curves of head, abdomen and long bones , 2005, Prenatal diagnosis.

[11]  P. Royston,et al.  How to construct ‘normal ranges’ for fetal variables , 1998, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[12]  G. Benda,et al.  Growth graphs for the clinical assessment of infants of varying gestational age. , 1976, The Journal of pediatrics.

[13]  Mario A. Bochicchio,et al.  Multidimensional analysis of fetal growth curves , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data.

[14]  J. Himes,et al.  Racial differences in birthweight for gestational age and infant mortality in extremely-low-risk US populations. , 1999, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[15]  Mark Sullivan,et al.  Quasi-cubes: exploiting approximations in multidimensional databases , 1997, SGMD.

[16]  J. Rodis,et al.  Efficacy of the biparietal diameter/femur length ratio to detect Down syndrome in patients with an abnormal biochemical screen. , 1994, Fetal diagnosis and therapy.

[17]  J. Udagawa,et al.  Multidimensional standard curve for the development process of human fetuses , 2010, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  D. Altman,et al.  Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology , 1994, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  F. P. Hadlock,et al.  Estimation of fetal weight with the use of head, body, and femur measurements--a prospective study. , 1985, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[20]  Philip Owen,et al.  Standards for ultrasound fetal growth velocity , 1996, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[21]  J. Egan,et al.  Use of the transverse cerebellar diameter/abdominal circumference ratio in pregnancies at risk for intrauterine growth retardation , 1994, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[22]  T Chard,et al.  Customised antenatal growth charts , 1992, The Lancet.

[23]  Curtis E. Dyreson,et al.  Information Retrieval from an Incomplete Data Cube , 1996, VLDB.

[24]  J. Gardosi,et al.  An adjustable fetal weight standard , 1995, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  Andre Francis,et al.  A customised birthweight centile calculator developed for a New Zealand population , 2004, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[26]  L. Lubchenco,et al.  Intrauterine growth in length and head circumference as estimated from live births at gestational ages from 26 to 42 weeks. , 1966, Pediatrics.

[27]  J Santolaya-Forgas,et al.  Intrapartum fetal subcutaneous tissue/femur length ratio: an ultrasonographic clue to fetal macrosomia. , 1994, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.