This report presents a case history of how an unreinforced masonry building sustained the 1989 Lorna Prieta Earthquake. The subject structure is a two-story historic building, and former firehouse located in downtown Gilroy California. The building was constructed in the last decade of the last century. Horizontal ground accelerations were as large as O.29g, and were amplified through the vibration of the floor and roof diaphragms. Although horizontal accelerations at the roof were as high as O. 79g, only minor cracking of the masonry was observed. At the turn of the century, unreinforced masonry construction was similar across the nation. Thus, response of the firehouse in Gilroy can help foretell the earthquake hazard in the eastern United States where similar URM buildings exist and moderate earthquakes are anticipated within a reasonable probability over the next fifty years. Though the ground motions recorded at Gilroy were but of moderate intensity, they represent an upper bound for assessing possible hazards associated with similarly constructed buildings in the eastern United States. Since the firehouse was not damaged appreciably, there is some hope that similar historic buildings across the nation may survive future seismic events. The purpose of this study was to examine dynamic response of the two-story URM structure in detail so that it may be better understood how the remaining stock of URM buildings across the nation may respond to future earthquakes. Specific objectives were: ./ 1. To investigate reasons why the firehouse withstood the ground shaking with little damage. 2. To estimate wall stresses using both simplified and state-of-the-art analytical methods, and correlate with current building codes and patterns of observed damage. 3. To develop a simple, discrete multi-degree-of-freedom analytical model to compute dynamic response of URM building systems with flexible diaphragms, and calibrate the model with measured response of the firehouse. 4. To run sensitivity studies using the analytical model so that the influences of masonry· wall stiffness, floor and roof diaphragm stiffness, and soil characteristics could be assessed. 5. To evaluate the use of finite element methods for estimating wall stresses and dynamic characteristics of a icomplete building system.
[1]
Donald E. Breyer.
Design of wood structures
,
1980
.
[2]
Robert R. Schneider,et al.
Reinforced Masonry Design
,
1980
.
[3]
Jamshid Ghaboussi,et al.
Generalized Differences in Direct Integration Methods for Transient Analysis
,
1987
.
[4]
A.H-S. Ang,et al.
Seismic Damage Analysis and Design of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings
,
1987
.
[5]
Daniel P. Abrams.
Masonry as a structural material
,
1992
.
[6]
Emilio Rosenblueth,et al.
Fundamentals of earthquake engineering
,
1971
.
[7]
James L. Noland.
U.S. Coordinated Program for Masonry Building Research
,
1988
.
[8]
H. Bolton Seed,et al.
Site-dependent spectra for earthquake-resistant design
,
1976,
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.
[9]
R. Sharpe.
Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings
,
1994
.
[10]
Edward L. Wilson,et al.
Numerical methods in finite element analysis
,
1976
.
[11]
B. Parlett.
The Symmetric Eigenvalue Problem
,
1981
.
[12]
W. J. Hall,et al.
Earthquake spectra and design
,
1982
.
[13]
Roberto Meli.
DISEÑO SISMICO DE EDIFICIOS DE MUROS DE MAMPOSTERIA. LA PRACTICA ACTUAL Y EL COMPORTAMIENTO OBSERVADO
,
1990
.
[14]
R. Clough,et al.
Dynamics Of Structures
,
1975
.
[15]
Xxyyzz,et al.
Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures (ACI 530-88/ASCE 5-88) and Specifications for Masonry Structures (ACI 530.1-88/ASCE 6-88) (ACI 530.1-88/ASCE 6-88)
,
1989
.
[16]
H S Lew.
PERFORMANCE OF STRUCTURES DURING THE LOMA PRIETA EARTHQUAKE OF OCTOBER 17, 1989
,
1990
.