A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care

[1]  Enza Lissandrello.  Reassembling the Social – An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2008 .

[2]  Mustafa Emirbayer.  What Is Agency ? ' , 2008 .

[3]  R. Thomson,et al.  Patients or research subjects? A qualitative study of participation in a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention. , 2006, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  C. May.  Mobilising modern facts: health technology assessment and the politics of evidence. , 2006, Sociology of health & illness.

[5]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Technogovernance: evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. , 2006, Social science & medicine.

[6]  C. May,et al.  Clinical reasoning, clinical trials and risky drinkers in everyday primary care: A qualitative study of British general practitioners , 2006 .

[7]  Carl May,et al.  Towards a wireless patient: chronic illness, scarce care and technological innovation in the United Kingdom. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[8]  B. Latour.  Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory , 2005 .

[9]  F S Mair,et al.  Patient and provider perspectives on home telecare: Preliminary results from a randomized controlled trial , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[10]  Trisha Greenhalgh,et al.  Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[11]  S. Cocksedge,et al.  Pastoral relationships and holding work in primary care: affect, subjectivity and chronicity , 2005, Chronic illness.

[12]  Tiago Moreira,et al.  Diversity in clinical guidelines: the role of repertoires of evaluation. , 2005, Social science & medicine.

[13]  P. Johnstone.  Technology‐related factors contributing to labour intensification of surgical production , 2005 .

[14]  Carl May,et al.  Chronic illness and intractability: professional—patient interactions in primary care , 2005, Chronic illness.

[15]  S. Flottorp,et al.  The OFF theory of research utilization. , 2005, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[16]  C. Abraham,et al.  Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach , 2005, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[17]  Davina Allen,et al.  Re-reading nursing and re-writing practice: towards an empirically based reformulation of the nursing mandate. , 2004, Nursing inquiry.

[18]  P Wainwright,et al.  Virtual outreach: a randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of joint teleconferenced medical consultations. , 2004, Health technology assessment.

[19]  G. Robert,et al.  Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. , 2004, The Milbank quarterly.

[20]  I. Winblad,et al.  Videoconferencing in child and adolescent telepsychiatry: a systematic review of the literature , 2004, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[21]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  Framing the doctor-patient relationship in chronic illness: a comparative study of general practitioners' accounts. , 2004, Sociology of health & illness.

[22]  Kevin J. Leonard,et al.  Application of Information Technology: Overcoming Structural Constraints to Patient Utilization of Electronic Medical Records: A Critical Review and Proposal for an Evaluation Framework , 2004, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[23]  James Barlow,et al.  Organizational complexity or technological complexity? Explaining telecare implementation , 2004 .

[24]  F. Mair,et al.  The anatomy of failure? Teledermatology in an English city , 2004 .

[25]  R. Scott,et al.  The socio-economic impact of telehealth: A systematic review , 2003, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[26]  Paul Wallace,et al.  Understanding the normalization of telemedicine services through qualitative evaluation. , 2003, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[27]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  Binge eating disorder: general practitioners' constructs of an ambiguous pathology , 2003, Primary Health Care Research & Development.

[28]  A. Louis,et al.  A systematic review of telemonitoring for the management of heart failure , 2003, European journal of heart failure.

[29]  Carl May,et al.  Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[30]  Carl May,et al.  Remote Doctors and Absent Patients: Acting at a Distance in Telemedicine? , 2003 .

[31]  Marcus Sanchez Svensson,et al.  Technology and medical practice. , 2003, Sociology of health & illness.

[32]  D. Banta.  The development of health technology assessment. , 2003, Health policy.

[33]  Jenny Donovan,et al.  Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[34]  K. Fairhurst.  How do general practitioners experience satisfaction with their consultations?: a qualitative study , 2003 .

[35]  M Berg,et al.  The Search for Synergy: Interrelating Medical Work and Patient Care Information Systems , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[36]  C Sicotte,et al.  Teleconsultation: Rejected and Emerging Uses , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[37]  M Berg,et al.  Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Patient Care Information System Evaluation , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[38]  P. Bower,et al.  Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. , 2002, Patient education and counseling.

[39]  T. L. Williams,et al.  Systematic review of cost effectiveness studies of telemedicine interventions , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  Medically unexplained symptoms and the problem of power in the primary care consultation: a qualitative study. , 2002, Family practice.

[41]  Sally Thorne,et al.  Chronic Illness Experience: Insights from a Metastudy , 2002, Qualitative health research.

[42]  M Berg,et al.  The theory of use behind telemedicine: how compatible with physicians' clinical routines? , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[43]  Paul Wallace,et al.  Implementation of Telemedicine: The Problem of Evaluation , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[44]  F S Mair,et al.  Factors Influencing the Evaluation of Telehealth Interventions: Preliminary Results from a Qualitative Study of Evaluation Projects in the UK , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[45]  A. Haycox,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Home Telecare , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[46]  Paul Wallace,et al.  The Benefits of a Qualitative Approach to Telemedicine Research , 2002, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[47]  Michael Rigby,et al.  Chapter 7: The Diffusion of Telemedicine , 2002 .

[48]  James Wallace,et al.  Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review , 2001, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[49]  Bonnie Kaplan,et al.  Evaluating informatics applications - clinical decision support systems literature review , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[50]  N T Ellis,et al.  When protocols fail: technical evaluation, biomedical knowledge, and the social production of 'facts' about a telemedicine clinic. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[51]  C. May,et al.  Knowing patients and knowledge about patients: evidence of modes of reasoning in the consultation? , 2001, Family practice.

[52]  Carl May,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of telehealthcare in the United Kingdom: the policy context and the problem of evidence , 2001 .

[53]  F. Mair,et al.  Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of telepsychiatry. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[54]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  White Paper: Toward an Informatics Research Agenda: Key People and Organizational Issues , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[55]  M. Dixon-Woods,et al.  Including qualitative research in systematic reviews: opportunities and problems. , 2001, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[56]  D. Eedy,et al.  Teledermatology: a review , 2001, The British journal of dermatology.

[57]  E. Miller,et al.  Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature , 2001, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[58]  Basil Achilladelis,et al.  The dynamics of technological innovation : the case of the pharmaceutical industry , 2001 .

[59]  C. May,et al.  Limitations of patient satisfaction studies in telehealthcare: a systematic review of the literature. , 2001, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[60]  C. Chew‐Graham,et al.  The burden of depression in primary care: a qualitative investigation of general practitioners' constructs of depressed people in the inner city , 2000 .

[61]  M. Roland,et al.  Defining quality of care. , 2000, Social science & medicine.

[62]  P. Sandercock,et al.  Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health , 2000, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[63]  A. Sinha.  An overview of telemedicine: the virtual gaze of health care in the next century. , 2000, Medical anthropology quarterly.

[64]  Lisa Cartwright,et al.  Reach Out and Heal Someone: Telemedicine and the Globalization of Health Care , 2000 .

[65]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  Transcending the Technology of Telemedicine: An Analysis of Telemedicine in North Carolina , 2000, Health communication.

[66]  F S Mair,et al.  A review of telemedicine cost-effectiveness studies , 2000, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[67]  C. R. May,et al.  Psychiatry By Videophone: A Trial Service In North West England , 1999, MIE.

[68]  C Chew-Graham,et al.  Chronic low back pain in general practice: the challenge of the consultation. , 1999, Family practice.

[69]  C. Hadjilambrinos.  Technological regimes: an analytical framework for the evaluation of technological systems , 1998 .

[70]  C. May,et al.  Art, Science and Placebo: Incorporating Homeopathy in General Practice , 1998 .

[71]  Mustafa Emirbayer,et al.  What Is Agency?1 , 1998, American Journal of Sociology.

[72]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  The Diffusion of Telemedicine , 1997 .

[73]  C. May,et al.  Menorrhagia: the need for equity in treatment in Britain , 1997 .

[74]  Peter Cukor,et al.  Telepsychiatry at Forty: What Have We Learned? , 1997, Harvard review of psychiatry.

[75]  C. May.  Degrees of freedom: reflexivity, self-identity and self-help , 1997 .

[76]  Kevin J. Dooley,et al.  A Complex Adaptive Systems Model of Organization Change , 1997 .

[77]  C. Dowrick,et al.  The Confidential Patient: The Social Construction of Therapeutic Relationships in General Medical Practice , 1996 .

[78]  P S Whitten,et al.  Analysis of telemedicine from an organizational perspective. , 1995, Telemedicine journal : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[79]  Mike Michael,et al.  Actor-Networks and Ambivalence: General Practitioners in the UK Cervical Screening Programme , 1993 .

[80]  L. Henderson.  On the Social System , 1993 .

[81]  D. Roter,et al.  Communication and medical practice: Social relations in the clinic , 1989 .

[82]  J. Jacob.  Doctors and Rules: A Sociology of Professional Values , 1988 .

[83]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Qualitative Analysis For Social Scientists , 1987 .

[84]  A. Giddens.  The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[85]  E. Shils.  The Constitution Of Society , 1982 .

[86]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[87]  O. Hall.  Sociological Research in the Field of Medicine: Progress and Prospects , 1951 .

[88]  Lawrence J. Henderson,et al.  Physician and Patient as a Social System , 1935 .