Determining the Area of Ancestral Origin for Individuals From North Eurasia Based on 5,229 SNP Markers

Currently available genetic tools effectively distinguish between different continental origins. However, North Eurasia, which constitutes one-third of the world’s largest continent, remains severely underrepresented. The dataset used in this study represents 266 populations from 12 North Eurasian countries, including most of the ethnic diversity across Russia’s vast territory. A total of 1,883 samples were genotyped using the Illumina Infinium Omni5Exome-4 v1.3 BeadChip. Three principal components were computed for the entire dataset using three iterations for outlier removal. It allowed the merging of 266 populations into larger groups while maintaining intragroup homogeneity, so 29 ethnic geographic groups were formed that were genetically distinguishable enough to trace individual ancestry. Several feature selection methods, including the random forest algorithm, were tested to estimate the number of genetic markers needed to differentiate between the groups; 5,229 ancestry-informative SNPs were selected. We tested various classifiers supporting multiple classes and output values for each class that could be interpreted as probabilities. The logistic regression was chosen as the best mathematical model for predicting ancestral populations. The machine learning algorithm for inferring an ancestral ethnic geographic group was implemented in the original software “Homeland” fitted with the interface module, the prediction module, and the cartographic module. Examples of geographic maps showing the likelihood of geographic ancestry for individuals from different regions of North Eurasia are provided. Validating methods show that the highest number of ethnic geographic group predictions with almost absolute accuracy and sensitivity was observed for South and Central Siberia, Far East, and Kamchatka. The total accuracy of prediction of one of 29 ethnic geographic groups reached 71%. The proposed method can be employed to predict ancestries from the populations of Russia and its neighbor states. It can be used for the needs of forensic science and genetic genealogy.

[1]  V. Petrushenko,et al.  Population-based biobank for analyzing the frequencies of clinically relevant DNA markers in the Russian population: bioinformatic aspects , 2020, Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention.

[2]  О. П. Балановский,et al.  Применение популяционного биобанка для анализа распространенности клинически значимых ДНК-маркеров в населении России: биоинформатические аспекты , 2020 .

[3]  W. Parson,et al.  Forensic evaluation of the Asia Pacific ancestry-informative MAPlex assay. , 2020, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[4]  X. Jin,et al.  Next generation sequencing of a set of ancestry-informative SNPs: ancestry assignment of three continental populations and estimating ancestry composition for Mongolians , 2020, Molecular Genetics and Genomics.

[5]  Kenneth K. Kidd,et al.  Population relationships based on 170 ancestry SNPs from the combined Kidd and Seldin panels , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[6]  M V Lareu,et al.  Development and validation of the EUROFORGEN NAME (North African and Middle Eastern) ancestry panel. , 2019, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[7]  K K Kidd,et al.  MAPlex - A massively parallel sequencing ancestry analysis multiplex for Asia-Pacific populations. , 2019, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[8]  X. Jin,et al.  Distinguishing three distinct biogeographic regions with an in‐house developed 39‐AIM‐InDel panel and further admixture proportion estimation for Uyghurs , 2019, Electrophoresis.

[9]  D. Reich,et al.  The genetic history of admixture across inner Eurasia , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[10]  X. Jin,et al.  A set of novel SNP loci for differentiating continental populations and three Chinese populations , 2019, PeerJ.

[11]  Dennis McNevin,et al.  Assessment of the Precision ID Ancestry panel , 2018, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[12]  V. Zaporozhchenko,et al.  Population biobanks: Organizational models and prospects of application in gene geography and personalized medicine , 2016, Russian Journal of Genetics.

[13]  Michael C. Westaway,et al.  Genomic analyses inform on migration events during the peopling of Eurasia , 2016, Nature.

[14]  Dennis McNevin,et al.  Forensically relevant SNaPshot® assays for human DNA SNP analysis: a review , 2016, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[15]  Tatiana V Tatarinova,et al.  Differential Evolution approach to detect recent admixture , 2015, bioRxiv.

[16]  Carson C Chow,et al.  Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets , 2014, GigaScience.

[17]  Lao Juan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Scale for Measuring Instructors' Attitudes toward Concept-Based or Reform-Oriented Teaching of Introductory Statistics in the Health and Behavioral Sciences , 2010, 1007.3219.

[18]  S. Borinskaya,et al.  Characteristics of Populations of the Russian Federation over the Panel of Fifteen Loci Used for DNA Identification and in Forensic Medical Examination , 2011, Acta naturae.

[19]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[20]  Josyf Mychaleckyj,et al.  Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies , 2010, Bioinform..

[21]  M. Feldman,et al.  Worldwide Human Relationships Inferred from Genome-Wide Patterns of Variation , 2008 .

[22]  D. Reich,et al.  Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies , 2006, Nature Genetics.

[23]  Iu G Rychkov,et al.  [Gene pool and gene geography of the USSR population]. , 1992, Genetika.

[24]  Iu G Rychkov,et al.  [Ethnogenetics: adaptive structure of the gene pool of the mankind from the data on human polymorphic genetic markers]. , 1990, Genetika.

[25]  Iu G Rychkov,et al.  [Ethnic genetics: ethnogeographic diversity of the gene pool of human populations around the world]. , 1990, Genetika.