Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks

To understand the effects of a cortical lesion it is necessary to consider not only the loss of local neural function, but also the lesion‐induced changes in the larger network of endogenous oscillatory interactions in the brain. To investigate how network embedding influences a region's functional role, and the consequences of its being damaged, we implement two models of oscillatory cortical interactions, both of which inherit their coupling architecture from the available anatomical connection data for macaque cerebral cortex. In the first model, node dynamics are governed by Kuramoto phase oscillator equations, and we investigate the sequence in which areas entrain one another in the transition to global synchrony. In the second model, node dynamics are governed by a more realistic neural mass model, and we assess long‐run inter‐regional interactions using a measure of directed information flow. Highly connected parietal and frontal areas are found to synchronize most rapidly, more so than equally highly connected visual and somatosensory areas, and this difference can be explained in terms of the network's clustered architecture. For both models, lesion effects extend beyond the immediate neighbors of the lesioned site, and the amplitude and dispersal of nonlocal effects are again influenced by cluster patterns in the network. Although the consequences of in vivo lesions will always depend on circuitry local to the damaged site, we conclude that lesions of parietal regions (especially areas 5 and 7a) and frontal regions (especially areas 46 and FEF) have the greatest potential to disrupt the integrative aspects of neocortical function. Hum Brain Mapp, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  William Hyde Wollaston,et al.  I. The Croonian Lecture , 1810, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[2]  J. Sprague,et al.  Interaction of Cortex and Superior Colliculus in Mediation of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cat , 1966, Science.

[3]  Yoshiki Kuramoto,et al.  In International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics , 1975 .

[4]  Huzihiro Araki,et al.  International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics , 1975 .

[5]  C. Morris,et al.  Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber. , 1981, Biophysical journal.

[6]  D. J. Felleman,et al.  Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. , 1991, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  Stanley Finger,et al.  Origins of neuroscience: A history of explorations into brain function. , 1994 .

[8]  S G Lomber,et al.  Removal of two halves restores the whole: Reversal of visual hemineglect during bilateral cortical or collicular inactivation in the cat , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[9]  J. Jackson,et al.  Evolution and Dissolution of the Nervous System , 1998 .

[10]  R. Larter,et al.  A coupled ordinary differential equation lattice model for the simulation of epileptic seizures. , 1999, Chaos.

[11]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[12]  M P Young,et al.  On imputing function to structure from the behavioural effects of brain lesions. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  Schreiber,et al.  Measuring information transfer , 2000, Physical review letters.

[14]  W. Singer,et al.  Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Young,et al.  Advanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Joan Stiles,et al.  The lesion methodology: contrasting views from adult and child studies. , 2002, Developmental psychobiology.

[18]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[19]  R. McCarley,et al.  Abnormal Neural Synchrony in Schizophrenia , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a biophysical model of neuronal dynamics , 2003 .

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a nonlinear model of neuronal dynamics , 2003, Neurocomputing.

[22]  G. Buzsáki,et al.  Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks , 2004, Science.

[23]  T. Prescott,et al.  The brainstem reticular formation is a small-world, not scale-free, network , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  A. Schnitzler,et al.  Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[25]  P. Hagmann,et al.  Mapping complex tissue architecture with diffusion spectrum magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Altered resting state networks in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease: An fMRI study , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[27]  S. Epstein,et al.  Background gamma rhythmicity and attention in cortical local circuits: a computational study. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Wenxu Wang,et al.  Enhanced synchronizability by structural perturbations. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[29]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Structural and functional clusters of complex brain networks , 2006 .

[30]  Alex Arenas,et al.  Synchronization reveals topological scales in complex networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[31]  Marc Timme,et al.  Does Dynamics Reflect Topology in Directed Networks , 2006, cond-mat/0610186.

[32]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Adaptive reconfiguration of fractal small-world human brain functional networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Changsong Zhou,et al.  Hierarchical organization unveiled by functional connectivity in complex brain networks. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[34]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[36]  R. Bluhm,et al.  Spontaneous low-frequency fluctuations in the BOLD signal in schizophrenic patients: anomalies in the default network. , 2007, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[37]  Rolf Kötter,et al.  Online retrieval, processing, and visualization of primate connectivity data from the CoCoMac Database , 2007, Neuroinformatics.

[38]  P. Thiran,et al.  Mapping Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI , 2007, PloS one.

[39]  Simona Monaco,et al.  Visual, somatosensory, and bimodal activities in the macaque parietal area PEc. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.