Closed-loop SRME based on 3D L1-norm sparse inversion

In many situations, the quality of seismic imaging is largely determined by a proper multiple attenuation as preprocessing step. Despite the widespread application of surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) and estimation of primaries by sparse inversion (EPSI) for the removal of multiples, there still exist some limitations in the process of prediction and subtraction (SRME) or inversion (EPSI), which make the efficiency of multiple attenuation less satisfactory. To solve these problems, a new fully data-driven method called closed-loop SRME was proposed, which combines the robustness of SRME and the multi-dimensional inversion strategy of EPSI. Due to the selection of inversion approach and constraint, primary estimation by closed-loop SRME may fall into a local optimum during the solving process, which lowers the accuracy of deep information and weakens the continuity of seismic events. To avoid these shortcomings, we first modified the solving method for closed-loop SRME to an L1 norm-based bi-convex optimization method, which stabilizes the solution. Meanwhile, in the L1 norm constraint-based optimization process, the 3D sparsifying transform, being a 2D Curvelet-1D wavelet transform, is brought in as a 3D sparse constraint. In the 3D sparsifying domain, the data become sparser, thus making the result of optimization more accurate, the information of seismic events more continuous and the resolution higher. Examples on both synthetic and field data demonstrate that the method proposed in this paper, compared with the traditional SRME and closed-loop SRME, have an excellent effect on primary estimation and suppress multiples effectively.

[1]  Deli Wang,et al.  Estimating primaries by sparse inversion of the 3D curvelet transform and the L1-norm constraint , 2013, Applied Geophysics.

[2]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Closed-Loop SRME - A New Direction in Surface Multiple Removal Algorithms , 2014 .

[3]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion, Part I: Theoretical considerations , 1997 .

[4]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Closed-loop surface-related multiple elimination and its application to simultaneous data reconstruction , 2015 .

[5]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Seismic Migration: Imaging of Acoustic Energy by Wave Field Extrapolation , 1980 .

[6]  E. Berg,et al.  New insights into one-norm solvers from the Pareto curve , 2008 .

[7]  G. Nolet Book reviewSeismic migration. Imaging of acoustic energy by wavefield extrapolation. A: theoretical aspects: A.J. Berkhout. Developments in Solid Earth Geophysics, 14A. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982, 2nd revised , 1985 .

[8]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization: Convex optimization problems , 2004 .

[9]  Chen Xiao-hon,et al.  Research status and progress in multiple elimination , 2014 .

[10]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Randomized sampling and sparsity: Getting more information from fewer samples , 2010 .

[11]  Felix J. Herrmann Robust source signature deconvolution and the estimation of primaries by sparse inversion , 2011 .

[12]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Estimating Primaries by Sparse Inversion in a Curvelet-like Representation Domain , 2011 .

[13]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Probing the Pareto Frontier for Basis Pursuit Solutions , 2008, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[14]  F. Herrmann,et al.  Robust estimation of primaries by sparse inversion via one-norm minimization , 2013 .

[15]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimating primaries by sparse inversion and application to near-offset data reconstruction , 2009 .

[16]  F. J. Herrmann,et al.  Stabalized Estimation of Primaries by Sparse Inversion , 2010 .

[17]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Convex Optimization , 2004, Algorithms and Theory of Computation Handbook.

[18]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[19]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion; Part II, Practical aspects and examples , 1997 .

[20]  Lexing Ying,et al.  3D discrete curvelet transform , 2005, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[21]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Estimation of primaries and near-offset reconstruction by sparse inversion: Marine data applications , 2009 .

[22]  E. Candès,et al.  Continuous curvelet transform: II. Discretization and frames , 2005 .

[23]  D. J. Verschuur,et al.  Adaptive surface-related multiple elimination , 1992 .

[24]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Efficient 2D and 3D shot record redatuming , 1989 .

[25]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Pass on the message: recent insights in large-scale sparse recovery , 2012 .

[26]  Michael P. Friedlander,et al.  Sparse Optimization with Least-Squares Constraints , 2011, SIAM J. Optim..

[27]  Jingjie Cao,et al.  Seismic Data Restoration Based on Compressive Sensing Using Regularization and Zero‐Norm Sparse Optimization , 2012 .