Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking Protocols for Progressive Keratoconus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of 18 mW/cm2 (5 minutes) versus 9 mW/cm2 (10 minutes) accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking protocols in patients with progressive keratoconus. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, and electronic information was searched to identify studies comparing the outcomes of 5- versus 10-minute protocols in patients with progressive keratoconus. Mean changes in uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, cylinder (diopters), thinnest corneal thickness, corneal keratometry values (K1 and K2), corneal high-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration, coma, and trefoil were the primary outcome measures. Secondary outcome measures included the mean change in central corneal thickness and postoperative complications. Random effects modeling was used for the analysis. Results: Four studies that enrolled 329 eyes were included. The 10-minute protocol had significantly improved outcomes compared with the 5-minute protocol for the mean changes in K1 and K2 (P < 0.00001), corneal total HOA (P = 0.0002), and corneal coma (P = 0.00001). However, no statistically significant differences were found between the 2 protocols in uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, cylinder, thinnest corneal thickness, spherical aberration, or trefoil. The 5-minute protocol was associated with a significantly lower mean change in the central corneal thickness for secondary outcomes. In addition, no significant differences were found between the 2 protocols for postoperative complications. Conclusions: The 10-minute protocol had better K1, K2, and HOA outcomes than the 5-minute protocol, but no statistically significant differences in the other outcomes.

[1]  Erdem Yüksel,et al.  Comparison of Two Different Accelerated Corneal Cross-linking Procedure Outcomes in Patients with Keratoconus , 2020, Balkan Medical Journal.

[2]  H. Hashemi,et al.  Standard and accelerated corneal cross-linking long-term results: A randomized clinical trial , 2020, European journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  I. Omar,et al.  Accelerated Epithelium-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking For Keratoconus: 12-Month Results , 2019, Clinical ophthalmology.

[4]  M. Eliaçık,et al.  Different accelerated corneal collagen cross-linking treatment modalities in progressive keratoconus , 2019, Eye and Vision.

[5]  Sashia Bak-Nielsen,et al.  Prolactin‐Induced Protein is a novel biomarker for Keratoconus , 2019, Experimental eye research.

[6]  T. Kohnen,et al.  Comparison of standard and accelerated corneal cross‐linking for the treatment of keratoconus: a meta‐analysis , 2018, Acta ophthalmologica.

[7]  H. Khairy,et al.  Accelerated versus standard corneal cross linking in the treatment of ectasia post refractive surgery and penetrating keratoplasty: a medium term randomized trial. , 2019, International journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  A. Fotouhi,et al.  Low light visual function after accelerated corneal Cross-Linking Protocols: 18 mW/cm2 vs. 9 mW/cm2 , 2018, Romanian journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Corneal crosslinking for keratoconus in Japanese populations: one year outcomes and a comparison between conventional and accelerated procedures , 2018, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  F. Price,et al.  Prospective Randomized Trial of Corneal Cross-linking Riboflavin Dosing Frequencies for Treatment of Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia. , 2017, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[11]  E. Toker,et al.  Efficacy of different accelerated corneal crosslinking protocols for progressive keratoconus. , 2017, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  C. Jayadev,et al.  Current Protocols of Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking: Visual, Refractive, and Tomographic Outcomes. , 2015, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  A. Fotouhi,et al.  Short‐term comparison of accelerated and standard methods of corneal collagen crosslinking , 2015, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  Piotr Jurowski,et al.  Two-Year Accelerated Corneal Cross-Linking Outcome in Patients with Progressive Keratoconus , 2015, BioMed research international.

[15]  R. Krueger,et al.  First Proposed Efficacy Study of High Versus Standard Irradiance and Fractionated Riboflavin/Ultraviolet A Cross-Linking With Equivalent Energy Exposure , 2014, Eye & contact lens.

[16]  A. Sherif Accelerated versus conventional corneal collagen cross-linking in the treatment of mild keratoconus: a comparative study , 2014, Clinical ophthalmology.

[17]  F. Hafezi,et al.  Corneal biomechanical properties at different corneal cross-linking (CXL) irradiances. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  P. Tugwell,et al.  The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses , 2014 .

[19]  G. Satpathy,et al.  Microsporidial Keratitis after Collagen Cross-linking , 2013, Ocular immunology and inflammation.

[20]  M. Mrochen Current status of accelerated corneal cross-linking , 2013, Indian journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  S. Greenstein,et al.  Higher‐order aberrations after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia , 2012, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  S. Greenstein,et al.  In Vivo Biomechanical Changes After Corneal Collagen Cross-linking for Keratoconus and Corneal Ectasia: 1-Year Analysis of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial , 2012, Cornea.

[23]  J. Holopainen,et al.  Transient corneal thinning in eyes undergoing corneal cross-linking. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  S. Greenstein,et al.  Corneal topography indices after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One‐year results , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  S. Greenstein,et al.  Corneal thickness changes after corneal collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: One‐year results , 2011, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[26]  Peter S. Hersh,et al.  Natural history of corneal haze after collagen crosslinking for keratoconus and corneal ectasia: Scheimpflug and biomicroscopic analysis , 2010, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[27]  C. Mazzotta,et al.  Long-term results of riboflavin ultraviolet a corneal collagen cross-linking for keratoconus in Italy: the Siena eye cross study. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[28]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  D. Gatinel,et al.  Total, corneal, and internal ocular optical aberrations in patients with keratoconus. , 2008, Journal of refractive surgery.

[30]  T. Seiler,et al.  Corneal collagen crosslinking with riboflavin and ultraviolet A to treat induced keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis , 2007, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[31]  Jorge L Alió,et al.  Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. , 2006, Journal of refractive surgery.

[32]  T. Seiler,et al.  Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.

[33]  E. Spoerl,et al.  Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. , 1998, Experimental eye research.