Dynamic fault weakening and the formation of large impact craters

Abstract Impact craters are the most common landform on planetary surfaces; however, the mechanics of the end stages of their formation are not fully understood. The final stage of crater formation involves the collapse of a hemispherical transient cavity. Around small craters, the limited amount of collapse preserves a bowl-shaped cavity. In contrast, the observed shallow depths and complex inner morphologies of large craters require very low shear strength in the collapsing material. Because the observed amount of collapse cannot be reproduced using quasi-static values for the frictional strength of fractured rock, a temporary weakening mechanism is necessary. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that craters collapse along a network of impact-generated faults that weaken during long displacements at high slip velocities via, for example, frictional melting. Using the CTH shock physics code, we simulate the formation of about 100-km diameter impact craters using a simple strain-rate weakening model with parameters constrained by fault friction experiments on crystalline rocks. The model reduces the coefficient of friction from a quasi-static value (0.6–0.85) to a weakened value (0.1–0.2) when a parcel of fractured material exceeds thresholds for cumulative plastic shear strain (a proxy for slip distance) and shear strain rate (a proxy for slip velocity). During crater formation, the strain-rate weakening model leads to strain localizations that are interpreted to be fault zones. Fault zones are spontaneously created and slip over discrete time intervals during collapse. The strain-rate weakening model reproduces the major geologic features observed around the largest terrestrial craters (Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub), including shallow depths, fault structures, frictional melt distributions, and deep-seated central uplifts. The good agreement between calculations and observations supports the hypothesis that small volumes of transiently weakened material in fault zones control the collapse of large impact craters.

[1]  J. Spray.  VISCOSITY DETERMINATIONS OF SOME FRICTIONALLY GENERATED SILICATE MELTS : IMPLICATIONS FOR FAULT ZONE RHEOLOGY AT HIGH STRAIN RATES , 1993 .

[2]  G. D. Toro,et al.  Friction falls towards zero in quartz rock as slip velocity approaches seismic rates , 2004, Nature.

[3]  J. Brune,et al.  Heat Flow, Stress, and Rate of Slip along the San Andreas Fault, , 1969 .

[4]  W. McKinnon.  An investigation into the role of plastic failure in crater modification , 1978 .

[5]  Toshihiko Shimamoto,et al.  High‐velocity frictional properties of gabbro , 1997 .

[6]  R. Sibson.  Generation of Pseudotachylyte by Ancient Seismic Faulting , 1975 .

[7]  W. Reimold,et al.  Some notes and speculations on the pseudotachylites in the Witwatersrand Basin and Vredefort Dome, South Africa , 1989 .

[8]  A. G. W. Cameron,et al.  The origin of the moon and the single-impact hypothesis III. , 1991 .

[9]  Martin Connors,et al.  Mapping Chicxulub crater structure with gravity and seismic reflection data , 1998, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[10]  S. Stewart,et al.  Impact crater formation in icy layered terrains on Mars , 2006 .

[11]  Pascal Lee,et al.  The Haughton‐Mars Project: Overview of science investigations at the Haughton impact structure and surrounding terrains, and relevance to planetary studies , 2005 .

[12]  T. Ahrens,et al.  Planetary cratering mechanics , 1993 .

[13]  M. Pilkington,et al.  Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation , 2008 .

[14]  M. Warner,et al.  Importance of pre-impact crustal structure for the asymmetry of the Chicxulub impact crater , 2008 .

[15]  M. Warner,et al.  Dynamic modeling suggests terrace zone asymmetry in the Chicxulub crater is caused by target heterogeneity , 2008 .

[16]  Boris A. Ivanov,et al.  IMPACT CRATER COLLAPSE , 1999 .

[17]  J. Spray,et al.  Pseudotachylytic rock distribution and genesis within the Sudbury impact structure , 1992 .

[18]  W. Reimold,et al.  Thermal-metamorphic signature of an impact event in the Vredefort dome, South Africa , 1998 .

[19]  D. Lockner,et al.  Crystallographic controls on the frictional behavior of dry and water-saturated sheet structure minerals , 2004 .

[20]  H. Melosh.  Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process , 1986 .

[21]  Gareth S. Collins,et al.  Modeling damage and deformation in impact simulations , 2004 .

[22]  A. M. Thwaites,et al.  Pseudotachylite associated with a bedding-parallel fault zone between the Witwatersrand and Ventersdorp Supergroups, South Africa , 1988 .

[23]  J. Spray.  Localized shock- and friction-induced melting in response to hypervelocity impact , 1998, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[24]  G. Wasserburg,et al.  Heat flow near major strike‐slip faults in California , 1971 .

[25]  B. Ivanov.  Numerical Modeling of the Largest Terrestrial Meteorite Craters , 2005 .

[26]  Thomas J. Ahrens,et al.  Complex craters: Relationship of stratigraphy and rings to impact conditions , 1999 .

[27]  W. Reimold,et al.  Impact tectonics in the core of the Vredefort dome, South Africa: Implications for central uplift formation in very large impact structures , 2003 .

[28]  H. J. Melosh,et al.  A hydrocode equation of state for SiO2 , 2007 .

[29]  G. Teza,et al.  Can pseudotachylytes be used to infer earthquake source parameters? An example of limitations in the study of exhumed faults , 2005 .

[30]  Stephen H. Hickman,et al.  Stress in the lithosphere and the strength of active faults , 1987 .

[31]  J. Suppe,et al.  State of stress near the San Andreas fault: Implications for wrench tectonics , 1987 .

[32]  U. Riller,et al.  Generation of fragment-rich pseudotachylite bodies during central uplift formation in the Vredefort impact structure, South Africa , 2009 .

[33]  G. Collins,et al.  Mid‐sized complex crater formation in mixed crystalline‐sedimentary targets: Insight from modeling and observation , 2008 .

[34]  F. Hörz,et al.  Large meteorite impacts III , 2005 .

[35]  Hadyn R. Butler,et al.  Tectonic influences on the morphometry of the Sudbury impact structure: Implications for terrestrial cratering and modeling , 2004 .

[36]  Fuping Yuan,et al.  Slip weakening in rocks and analog materials at co-seismic slip rates , 2008 .

[37]  B. Ivanov,et al.  Structure and formation of a central uplift: A case study at the Upheaval Dome impact crater, Utah , 2005 .

[38]  S. Runcorn.  Book Review: Impact and Explosion Cratering. Proceedings of the Symposium on Planetary Cratering Mechanics. Pergamon Press, 1977, 1299 pp., US $150.00, £98.00, ISBN 0-08-022050-9 , 1984 .

[39]  R. Grieve,et al.  Vredefort, Sudbury, Chicxulub: Three of a Kind? , 2000 .

[40]  Gordon R. Osinski,et al.  Tectonics of complex crater formation as revealed by the Haughton impact structure, Devon Island, Canadian High Arctic , 2005 .

[41]  N. Lundborg,et al.  Strength of rock-like materials , 1968 .

[42]  D. Goldsby,et al.  Low frictional strength of quartz rocks at subseismic slip rates , 2002 .

[43]  M. Zoback,et al.  New Evidence on the State of Stress of the San Andreas Fault System , 1987, Science.

[44]  J. Spray.  Pseudotachylyte controversy: Fact or friction? , 1995 .

[45]  Y. Fialko,et al.  Experimental investigation of frictional melting of argillite at high slip rates: Implications for seismic slip in subduction‐accretion complexes , 2009 .

[46]  J. Wilson,et al.  Pseudotachylitic breccias from fault zones in the Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa: evidence of autometasomatism and post-brecciation alteration processes , 1999 .

[47]  Jin-Han Ree,et al.  Ultralow Friction of Carbonate Faults Caused by Thermal Decomposition , 2007, Science.

[48]  S. J. Shand.  The Pseudotachylyte of Parijs (Orange Free State), and its Relation to ‘Trap-Shotten Gneiss’ and ‘Flinty Crush-Rock’ , 1916, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.

[49]  T. Shimamoto,et al.  Growth of molten zone as a mechanism of slip weakening of simulated faults in gabbro during frictional melting , 2005 .

[50]  M. Bunds.  Fault strength and transpressional tectonics along the Castle Mountain strike-slip fault, southern Alaska , 2001 .

[51]  T. Shimamoto,et al.  Reconstruction of seismic faulting by high‐velocity friction experiments: An example of the 1995 Kobe earthquake , 2007 .

[52]  J. Morgan,et al.  Structural uplift beneath the Chicxulub impact structure , 2008 .

[53]  W. Reimold,et al.  The melt rocks of the Vredefort impact structure – Vredefort Granophyre and pseudotachylitic breccias: Implications for impact cratering and the evolution of the Witwatersrand Basin , 2006 .

[54]  T. Ahrens,et al.  Damage and rock-volatile mixture effects on impact crater formation , 2001 .

[55]  T. Shimamoto,et al.  Frictional melt and seismic slip , 2008 .

[56]  H. Melosh.  The Mechanics of Pseudotachylite Formation in Impact Events , 2005 .

[57]  E. Kirby,et al.  Frictional properties of natural fault gouge from a low‐angle normal fault, Panamint Valley, California , 2007 .

[58]  J. Rice,et al.  CONDITIONS FOR THE LOCALIZATION OF DEFORMATION IN PRESSURE-SENSITIVE DILATANT MATERIALS , 1975 .

[59]  R. Grieve,et al.  Terrestrial impact structures: principal characteristics and energy considerations. , 1977 .

[60]  Evidence for melt lubrication during large earthquakes , 2005 .

[61]  H. Melosh,et al.  Peak-ring formation in large impact craters: geophysical constraints from Chicxulub , 2000 .

[62]  W. Reimold,et al.  Pseudotachylites of the Vredefort Dome and the surrounding Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa , 1992 .

[63]  E. Brodsky,et al.  Shear-weakening of the transitional regime for granular flow , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[64]  T. Shimamoto,et al.  Natural and Experimental Evidence of Melt Lubrication of Faults During Earthquakes , 2006, Science.

[65]  H. Jay Melosh,et al.  Acoustic fluidization: A new geologic process? , 1979 .

[66]  J. Spray.  Generation and crystallization of an amphibolite shear melt: an investigation using radial friction welding apparatus , 1988 .

[67]  W. Reimold,et al.  Review of the pseudotachylites in and around the Vredefort "Dome", South Africa , 1990 .

[68]  H. Melosh.  Dynamical weakening of faults by acoustic fluidization , 1996, Nature.

[69]  M. Grady.  Meteorites: Flux With Time and Impact Effects , 1998 .

[70]  J. Spray.  Artificial generation of pseudotachylyte using friction welding apparatus: simulation of melting on a fault plane , 1987 .

[71]  S. Stewart,et al.  Modeling impact cratering in layered surfaces , 2007 .

[72]  A. Lachenbruch,et al.  Frictional heating, fluid pressure, and the resistance to fault motion , 1980 .

[73]  H. Melosh,et al.  Hydrocode simulations of Chicxulub crater collapse and peak-ring formation , 2002 .

[74]  W. Reimold,et al.  “Pseudotachylites” in Large Impact Structures , 2005 .

[75]  B. Dressler,et al.  Order or chaos? Origin and mode of emplacement of breccias in floors of large impact structures , 2004 .

[76]  M. Pilkington,et al.  Size and structure of the Chicxulub crater revealed by horizontal gravity gradients and cenotes , 1995, Nature.

[77]  P. Vermeesch,et al.  Chicxulub central crater structure: Initial results from physical property measurements and combined velocity and gravity modeling , 2004 .

[78]  Boris A. Ivanov,et al.  Numerical modelling of the impact crater depth–diameter dependence in an acoustically fluidized target , 2003 .

[79]  J. M. McGlaun,et al.  CTH: A three-dimensional shock wave physics code , 1990 .

[80]  A. M. Killick,et al.  An estimate of the physical conditions of pseudotachylite formation in the West Rand Goldfield, Witwatersrand Basin, South Africa , 1998 .

[81]  Wolf Uwe Reimold,et al.  Pseudotachylite in impact structures — generation by friction melting and shock brecciation?: A review and discussion , 1995 .

[82]  J. Rice.  Heating and weakening of faults during earthquake slip , 2006 .

[83]  G. Collins,et al.  How big was the Chesapeake Bay impact? Insight from numerical modeling , 2005 .

[84]  J. Spray,et al.  Friction melt distribution in a multi-ring impact basin , 1995, Nature.

[85]  Elisabetta Pierazzo,et al.  Impact structures: What does crater diameter mean? , 2005 .