Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy for the detection of tumor foci in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy.

PURPOSE We determined the ability of combined endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) to detect prostate cancer foci prospectively in men with prior negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Endorectal MRI with spectroscopy was performed in 24 consecutive patients with 1 or more prior negative TRUS prostatic biopsies for persistently increased prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination. All studies were interpreted by a dedicated radiologist who reported areas of interest in the peripheral zone as normal, equivocal or suspicious on MRI and MRSI separately. Equivocal and suspicious areas were then correlated with a 3-dimensional prostate model. All patients underwent a standard TRUS 10-core peripheral zone biopsy with up to 4 additional biopsies targeted at the equivocal or suspected sites. RESULTS Prostate cancer was detected in 7 of 24 subjects (29.2%). Considering the equivocal category as test negative the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and the accuracy of MRI, MRSI and combined MRI/MRSI for the detection of prostate cancer were 57.1%, 57.1% and 100.0%, 88.2%, 82.4% and 70.6%, 66.7%, 57.1% and 58.3%, 83.3%, 82.1% and 100%, and 79.2%, 75.0% and 79.2%, respectively. The site of positive biopsy correlated correctly in 50% and 28.6% of MRI and MRSI labeled suspicious cores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS MRI and MRSI have the potential to identify cancer foci and direct TRUS in patients with a previous negative TRUS biopsy. Further, larger studies are required to quantify the amount of benefit.

[1]  K. Badani,et al.  Prospective evaluation of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging to detect tumor foci in men with prior negative prostastic biopsy: a pilot study. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[2]  W. Catalona,et al.  Prostate specific antigen density versus prostate specific antigen slope as predictors of prostate cancer in men with initially negative prostatic biopsies. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[3]  J H Ellis,et al.  MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  Kazuto Ito,et al.  MR spectroscopy as a reliable diagnostic tool for localization of prostate cancer. , 2002, Anticancer research.

[5]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  The prostate: MR imaging and spectroscopy. Present and future. , 2000 .

[6]  P. Tan,et al.  Improved detection rate of prostate cancer using the 10-core biopsy strategy in Singapore. , 2002, Asian journal of surgery.

[7]  S. Sternberg,et al.  Diagnostic surgical pathology , 1994 .

[8]  W. Ellis,et al.  Repeat prostate needle biopsy: who needs it? , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[9]  V. Barbetti,et al.  Results of rebiopsy for suspected prostate cancer in symptomatic men with elevated PSA levels. , 1997, European urology.

[10]  S. Robboy Diagnostic Surgical Pathology, 3rd ed , 2000 .

[11]  P. Carroll,et al.  Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging--clinicopathologic study. , 1999, Radiology.

[12]  J. Vilanova,et al.  The value of endorectal MR imaging to predict positive biopsies in clinically intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients , 2001, European Radiology.

[13]  J Kurhanewicz,et al.  Sextant localization of prostate cancer: comparison of sextant biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging with step section histology. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[14]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: value of MR imaging. , 2002, Radiology.